A supposedly balanced portfolio secretly cosplaying as an aggressive growth junkie with a semiconductor crush
Report created on Jan 23, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
VO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
VOO - US9229083632 49.00% -
VX Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
VXUS - US9219097683 15.00% -
AV Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
AVUV - US0250728773 14.00% -
SO Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
SOXQ - US46138G6153 9.00% -
AV Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF
AVDV - US0250728021 8.00% -
UF Procure Space ETF
UFO - US74280R2058 5.00%
This thing is labelled “balanced” but it’s basically 99% stocks and 1% denial. Half the money is parked in a plain-vanilla S&P 500 fund, then you turbocharge it with small-cap value and spicy sector bets like semiconductors and actual space. Compared with a normal “balanced” setup that might be 40–60% bonds, this is more like 100% send-it mode. Calling this broadly diversified is like calling a roller coaster “mildly bumpy.” If the real goal is balanced, add a genuine stabilizer: some lower-volatility assets or at least tone down the niche toys so the core actually behaves like a core, not a launchpad.
Growth
A 13.83% CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate: your average yearly growth over time) is objectively pretty sweet. If someone tossed $10,000 into this in the past, they’d be sitting on a very smug balance today, likely beating a typical 60/40 portfolio. But that -26.24% max drawdown is the hangover behind the party — a quarter of the value gone at one point. That’s “check your account and question life choices” territory. Past data is like yesterday’s weather: useful, not psychic. This setup has clearly been paid well for risk, but anyone using it needs to be sure they can emotionally withstand another 25–35% punch without bailing at the worst moment.
Projection
The Monte Carlo simulation — basically thousands of “what if the market did this?” coin flips using past patterns — is screaming optimism. Median outcome around +497% and a spicy 15.86% simulated annual return is the financial version of a highlight reel. But Monte Carlo is just math drunk on history; it assumes tomorrow vaguely rhymes with yesterday. The 5th percentile only being +27.2% shows even the “bad” outcomes still did okay, which feels… suspiciously generous. Treat this as a vibe check, not a promise. If future returns are lower or volatility spikes harder than in the sample, these glossy projections will age about as well as a meme stock subreddit.
Asset classes
- Stocks 99%
Asset classes: 99% stocks, 0% bonds, 0% cash, 0% chill. For something tagged “Balanced,” this is straight-up an equity portfolio pretending it owns a risk profile it doesn’t. In normal land, a balanced mix spreads across stocks, bonds, maybe some real assets, so when stocks crater, something else at least tries to behave like an adult. Here, everything rides the same growth roller coaster. That’s fine for long-term, high-risk appetites, but the label is misleading. If stability, income, or shorter horizons matter, folding in assets that don’t move in sync with equities would make this far less of an all-or-nothing bet on global growth.
Sectors
- Technology 31%
- Financials 14%
- Industrials 13%
- Consumer Discretionary 11%
- Telecommunications 8%
- Health Care 7%
- Energy 5%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Consumer Staples 4%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector-wise, this thing is drinking the tech Kool-Aid: 31% technology plus another decent chunk in cyclicals and financials gives it a very “boom times are forever” flavor. Semiconductors alone at 9% via a concentrated ETF is basically saying, “I’d like my portfolio to live and die by chips.” Space gets its own 5% joyride, which is fun dinner conversation but not exactly defensive. Compared to a broad global index, you’re amped up on growth-sensitive sectors and pretty light on the boring, stable stuff. Dialling back the satellite-and-chip obsession and leaning more on broad, boring exposure would make this look less like a tech-fan stock draft and more like an actual allocation.
Regions
- North America 76%
- Europe Developed 10%
- Japan 5%
- Asia Emerging 3%
- Asia Developed 3%
- Australasia 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
Geographically, this is very “America first, everyone else maybe later.” Roughly 76% North America, with Europe and the rest of the world picking up scraps. That’s not wildly different from global market weights, but paired with your sector tilt it means you’re double-down on US growth and US tech. If the US keeps dominating, this looks genius. If not, you’ve basically bet that the rest of the world exists mainly to be a minor supporting character. A more balanced global spread — not just in quantity, but in how much hangs on US mega-themes — would prevent the portfolio from being so tightly chained to one region’s economic story.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 32%
- Large-cap 27%
- Mid-cap 19%
- Small-cap 13%
- Micro-cap 8%
Market cap mix is actually one of the more interesting bits: 32% mega, 27% big, then a legit 21% combined in small and micro caps. That’s like blending a blue-chip index fund with a “hold my beer” small-cap tilt. Small and micro caps can outperform over decades but they’re moody as hell — think of them as the drama kids of the market: loud, volatile, and occasionally brilliant. In a downturn, they usually drop harder and recover later. If the goal is smoother sailing, this tilt is working against that. If the goal is long-term growth and chaos tolerance, fine — just don’t pretend this is a chill ride.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On a risk–return spectrum, this setup is clearly leaning into the “more risk for more juice” side, not trying to sit neatly on some textbook Efficient Frontier. The Efficient Frontier is basically the curve of “best possible return for each level of risk,” and this looks like it walked past the reasonable middle and grabbed extra volatility in small caps, semis, and space without clearly improving diversification. The historical and simulated returns look great, but that’s during a very pro-equity, pro-tech era. If smoothing the ride and tightening the risk-return trade-off matters, trimming the loudest, most correlated risk bets and adding something that actually stabilizes would drag this closer to efficient and away from “hope the bull market never ends.”
Dividends
- Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF 2.80%
- Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.50%
- Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF 0.40%
- Procure Space ETF 0.40%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 3.00%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.48%
A 1.48% total yield is basically the portfolio’s way of saying, “I’m here for growth, not for your monthly cash flow.” Some of the international and small-cap value holdings try to help with 2–3% yields, but then semis and space show up with 0.4% and ruin the income party. This is not an income machine; it’s a reinvest-and-wait strategy. That’s fine for long-term accumulation, less fine if someone expects the portfolio to pay bills anytime soon. If future withdrawals are part of the plan, slowly shifting toward higher and more stable yield sources over time would prevent having to sell chunks of “space dreams” to cover ordinary life expenses.
Ongoing product costs
- Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF 0.36%
- Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
- Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF 0.19%
- Procure Space ETF 0.75%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.14%
Costs are honestly suspiciously reasonable for a portfolio that includes a literal space ETF. A 0.14% total expense ratio is solid, and your main building blocks (S&P 500 and total international) are dirt cheap. Then space crashes the party at 0.75% like, “Hey, I’m special.” Active-ish tilts like Avantis carry higher fees, but at least those are within normal human range. You’re not bleeding money on costs, which is more than can be said for many “fun” portfolios. Still, it’s worth asking if the niche stuff is actually pulling its weight, or if it’s just an expensive way to feel edgy while the cheap core quietly does most of the work.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey