Get this analysis for your own portfolio Paste your holdings — the first report is free and takes about a minute. Analyze mine

Concentrated US stock portfolio blending dividends growth and option income with efficient overall risk balance

Report created on Aug 19, 2026

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

2/5
Low Diversity
Less diversification More diversification
Curious how your own portfolio scores? Same analysis, your holdings. First report free — no card needed. Analyze mine

Positions

This portfolio is a focused, all‑equity mix with five US‑listed ETFs and no bonds or cash buffer. Half the allocation sits in a broad US dividend ETF, a quarter in a US large‑cap growth fund, and about one‑sixth in a Nasdaq‑100 premium income strategy using options. Small portions go to US small‑cap value and a broad international equity ETF. This creates a clear tilt toward US stocks, established dividend payers, and large growth companies, with only a small slice in smaller companies and overseas markets. The structure matches a “balanced” risk label mainly through mixing higher‑volatility growth with more defensive yield and option‑income, rather than through adding bonds.

Growth Info

Over the period shown, a hypothetical $1,000 grew to about $1,826, which is strong in absolute terms. The portfolio’s compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was 24.21%, meaning it grew roughly 24% per year on average, like measuring average speed over a road trip. Both the US and global market benchmarks did a bit better, but the gap is modest. Max drawdown was about -17.7%, so at worst it was down that much from a prior peak, similar to the broad market. Only 28 days generated 90% of returns, highlighting how a handful of strong days drove most growth — a common feature of equity‑heavy portfolios.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection uses historical returns and volatility to randomly simulate many possible 15‑year paths. Think of it as re‑shuffling past good and bad years thousands of times to see a range of futures. The median outcome turns $1,000 into about $2,672, with a wide “likely” band between roughly $1,785 and $4,114. The average simulated annual return is just under 8%, and about 72% of runs end with a gain. These numbers are not promises; they simply show what might happen if the past were a rough guide. Real outcomes could sit outside this range if markets behave very differently.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All of this portfolio is in stocks, with no explicit allocation to bonds, cash, or alternatives. That makes the asset‑class mix simple but also removes the natural cushioning that fixed income can sometimes provide during equity sell‑offs. Being 100% equities means returns are driven almost entirely by company earnings, valuations, and equity market sentiment. The “balanced” label here comes from combining different equity styles — dividend, growth, small‑cap value, and option‑income — rather than balancing stocks against bonds. This structure can participate fully in equity upswings but will also feel stock‑market downturns more directly.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    29%
  • Health Care
    14%
  • Consumer Staples
    12%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    9%
  • Financials
    9%
  • Energy
    9%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Industrials
    7%
  • Basic Materials
    1%
  • Utilities
    1%

Sector exposure is tilted toward technology at 29%, with meaningful slices in health care, consumer staples, consumer discretionary, financials, energy, and telecom. Compared with broad global indices, the tech share is elevated but not extreme, while health care and staples give a defensive, cash‑flow‑oriented flavor. Energy and telecom add more cyclical and interest‑rate‑sensitive elements. This mix means results will reflect how different parts of the economy move: tech and consumer areas often drive performance in growthy markets, while staples and health care can soften the blow in tougher times. Overall, the sector breakdown is reasonably diversified for an all‑equity portfolio.

Regions Info

  • North America
    97%
  • Europe Developed
    2%
  • Japan
    1%

Geographically, the portfolio is very US‑centric: about 97% in North America, with only small slices in developed Europe and Japan. Many global benchmarks hold a noticeably larger share outside the US, so this is a clear home‑country tilt. A strong alignment with the US market can work well when US companies outperform, but it also ties the portfolio closely to the US economy, currency, and regulatory environment. The limited overseas exposure means events in other regions have relatively little impact, while US‑specific shocks or policy shifts could influence most holdings at the same time, increasing reliance on a single market.

Market capitalization Info

  • Large-cap
    48%
  • Mega-cap
    25%
  • Mid-cap
    20%
  • Small-cap
    5%
  • Micro-cap
    3%

By market cap, the portfolio leans toward larger companies: about three‑quarters in mega‑ and large‑caps, with the rest in mid‑, small‑, and micro‑caps. Large and mega companies tend to be more established and liquid, which can reduce idiosyncratic risk compared with concentrating in tiny firms. The explicit small‑cap value ETF and modest micro‑cap exposure bring in more cyclical and potentially higher‑growth names, which can move more sharply in both directions. This blend provides a solid large‑cap core, similar to many broad indices, while still tapping into the different behavior of smaller companies, particularly during economic recoveries and early‑cycle environments.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    4.17%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
  • Apple Inc.
    3.45%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
  • Microsoft Corporation
    2.78%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
  • Abbott Laboratories
    2.38%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
  • Amgen Inc
    2.29%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
  • Merck & Company Inc
    2.21%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
  • Amazon.com Inc
    2.11%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
  • The Coca-Cola Company
    2.08%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
  • The Home Depot Inc
    2.02%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
    1.99%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
  • Top 10 total 25.47%

Looking through ETF top holdings, several big names appear as common underlying positions, including NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and large health‑care and consumer brands. None is held directly; all come via the ETFs. Combined, these top look‑through positions account for noticeable slices of the overall portfolio, even though they may be spread across multiple funds. This creates some “hidden” concentration: if a company is in both a growth ETF and an income or Nasdaq strategy, its influence is larger than any single fund’s weight suggests. Because only ETF top‑10s are used, true overlap is likely higher than shown.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
High
Data availability: 100%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
Neutral
Data availability: 100%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
Low
Data availability: 100%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
Neutral
Data availability: 100%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
High
Data availability: 100%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
High
Data availability: 100%

Factor exposure shows notable tilts to value, yield, and low volatility, with neutral size and quality and a mild tilt away from momentum. Factors are like underlying “traits” — for example, value stocks look cheaper, yield stocks pay more dividends, and low‑volatility stocks tend to swing less. This portfolio’s high yield and low‑volatility readings align with its heavy dividend and premium‑income positions, which aim for steadier cash flows and smoother price moves. At the same time, weaker momentum exposure means it may lag strong, fast‑moving rallies driven by the most aggressively trending stocks, while potentially being a bit more resilient if trends abruptly reverse.

Risk contribution Info

  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
    Weight: 50.00%
    40.4%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    Weight: 25.00%
    31.1%
  • Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    Weight: 17.00%
    19.4%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
    Weight: 5.00%
    6.5%
  • Schwab International Equity ETF
    Weight: 3.00%
    2.7%

Risk contribution shows how much each ETF drives overall ups and downs, which can differ from simple weights. The 50% dividend ETF contributes about 40% of risk, so it’s slightly less volatile than its size alone suggests. By contrast, the 25% large‑cap growth ETF contributes over 31% of risk, and the small 5% small‑cap value slice adds more risk than its weight would imply. The top three positions together drive over 90% of portfolio volatility. That means even though the number of funds is five, most of the actual risk comes from a relatively tight core of three ETFs.

Redundant positions Info

  • Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    High correlation

The correlation data highlights that the Nasdaq‑100 premium income ETF moves very similarly to the US large‑cap growth ETF. Correlation measures how often things move together; a near‑perfect correlation means these two respond in almost the same direction at the same time. The option‑income overlay can change the size of moves, but day‑to‑day patterns are still closely linked. This reduces diversification benefits between those two funds during sharp tech‑driven market swings. In practice, the portfolio has a strong, coherent tech‑and‑growth engine across multiple ETFs, rather than several independent return streams that behave very differently from each other.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

On the risk‑return chart, the current portfolio sits on or very near the efficient frontier, meaning that, given these five holdings, the weighting is already delivering strong risk‑adjusted returns. The Sharpe ratio — a measure of return earned per unit of volatility — is 1.39 for the current mix, versus 1.68 at the theoretical optimum and 1.62 for the lowest‑risk combination. The gaps are relatively small, so the structure is doing a good job with the ingredients it uses. Any improvement implied by the curve would come mainly from fine‑tuning weights among the existing ETFs, rather than needing entirely new assets.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.20%
  • Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF 10.00%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.00%
  • Schwab International Equity ETF 3.00%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 3.45%

The overall dividend yield of about 3.45% is driven by the high‑yield Nasdaq‑100 premium income ETF and the dividend‑oriented and international funds. Dividend yield measures cash paid out each year as a percentage of the portfolio’s value, so it can be an important part of total return, especially when price growth slows. Here, the 10% yield from the premium income strategy reflects option premiums plus dividends, while the large‑cap growth ETF contributes very little yield, focusing more on reinvested earnings. This combination creates a meaningful ongoing cash stream alongside potential capital appreciation from both value‑ and growth‑oriented holdings.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF 0.29%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Schwab International Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.10%

Total ongoing fund costs, measured by the combined TER of around 0.10%, are impressively low for a multi‑ETF equity portfolio. TER, or Total Expense Ratio, is like a small annual subscription fee charged by each fund, taken directly from returns. Most of the allocation sits in low‑fee Schwab ETFs, with slightly higher costs in the small‑cap value and Nasdaq‑100 premium income funds to pay for more specialized strategies. Keeping costs at this level supports better long‑term compounding since less return is consumed by fees each year. From a cost perspective, the structure is very efficient and aligns well with low‑cost investing principles.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

Compare your holdings

How much do the funds you hold actually overlap with the ones people weigh them against?

AVUV vs SPMO SCHD vs SGOV AVUV vs XMMO AVUV vs VTV

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey