Two index funds pretending to be complex while quietly missing the easy US upside
Report created on Sep 18, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
VX Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
VXUS - US9219097683 60.00% -
VO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
VOO - US9229083632 40.00%
This “portfolio” is basically two giant index funds taped together and proudly called diversified. Structurally it’s 60% “everything-but-US” and 40% US large caps, so it’s globally broad but with a weird tilt that slightly handicaps the strongest engine in recent history. It’s like building a two-cylinder car where one cylinder is the S&P 500 and the other is the rest of the planet vaguely hoping to catch up. Simple is fine; simple and slightly lopsided is less charming. The whole thing is 100% stocks too, so that “Balanced” label is doing some heavy marketing work here. This is equity salad, not a balanced meal.
Growth
Historically, this thing grew $1,000 into $3,165 — decent, until it stands next to the US market’s $1,000 turning into something meaningfully bigger with a 15.44% CAGR. Your 12.25% CAGR is basically “nice try” versus that. Against the global market, it’s just a small 0.52% annual lag, which is the investing equivalent of tripping on the last step. Max drawdown around -34% lines up with the benchmarks, so when markets panic, this behaves like a full-risk equity portfolio, not a “balanced” one. And 31 days made 90% of returns — blink on the wrong days and the magic never happened. Past data helps, but it’s still yesterday’s weather.
Projection
The Monte Carlo simulation is basically a thousand alternate universes for this portfolio. Median outcome: $1,000 becomes about $2,778 in 15 years, which is perfectly okay but not exactly fireworks. The likely range from roughly $1,861 to $4,273 says “might be fine, might be underwhelming,” and the ugly tail shows you can end up barely above $1,000 in bad worlds. An average simulated return of 8.32% is noticeably lower than the backward-looking 12.25% CAGR, which is the market’s way of saying “don’t get cocky.” Simulations use historical vibes plus randomness — useful, but not a prophecy, more like a weather app with commitment issues.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Asset class breakdown: 100% stocks, 0% everything else. Calling this “Balanced” is like calling black coffee a three-course meal. There’s no bonds, no cash sleeve, no alternatives — just pure equity beta all the time. That means full participation in both the good times and the faceplants. In theory, mixing asset classes can smooth the ride; here, the ride is whatever global stocks feel like doing on any given day. The portfolio structure is honest, at least: no illusions of safety padding. It’s a one-note instrument that just happens to be playing the “world equity” song pretty loudly.
Sectors
- Technology 27%
- Financials 19%
- Industrials 12%
- Consumer Discretionary 9%
- Health Care 8%
- Telecommunications 6%
- Basic Materials 5%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Energy 4%
- Utilities 3%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector-wise, this is a tech-flavored index smoothie: 27% technology up top, then chunky servings of financials and industrials. It’s basically market-cap-weighted capitalism with a silicon addiction. Nothing here is carefully curated; it’s just whatever the world decided to overprice the least or most recently. The top look-through names — NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet — confirm that the usual megacap suspects are quietly running the show from both funds. So while the sector pie chart looks “balanced,” in practice a lot of the drama is still coming from one crowded, overachieving corner of the market that loves boom-bust cycles.
Regions
- North America 45%
- Europe Developed 22%
- Asia Developed 10%
- Japan 9%
- Asia Emerging 8%
- Australasia 3%
- Africa/Middle East 2%
- Latin America 1%
- Europe Emerging 1%
Geographically, this thing finally behaves like a grown-up: about 45% North America and 55% scattered across Europe, Asia, and friends. For once, it’s not “USA or bust,” it’s more “USA plus literally everyone else in roughly sensible proportions.” Honestly, this is one of the least stupid parts of the portfolio. But that 60% international tilt does mean extra exposure to economies and markets that have spent the last decade politely underperforming the US. When global ex-US eventually wakes up, this looks enlightened; until then, it’s like insisting on eating your vegetables while everyone else is just living on S&P 500 dessert.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 46%
- Large-cap 31%
- Mid-cap 17%
- Small-cap 3%
Market cap breakdown: 46% mega-cap, 31% large-cap, 17% mid-cap, 3% small-cap. Translation: this is a love letter to the giants with a polite nod to the middle children and a token gesture to the runts. That’s classic cap-weighted indexing — most of the money piles into the biggest names simply because they’re big. The result is a portfolio that moves mostly with the moods of mega-caps, not with the broader market’s scrappy smaller players. It’s not wrong, just incredibly conventional. You’re not discovering hidden gems here; you’re buying the corporate equivalent of global celebrities and calling it a day.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 3.23%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AA Apple Inc. 2.81%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 2.38%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 2.28%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.54%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.20%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
SS Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.14%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.06%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 0.96%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
00 SK Hynix Inc 0.88%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
- Top 10 total 17.48%
The look-through holdings read like a tech mega-cap fan club: NVIDIA, Apple, TSMC, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Samsung, Broadcom, SK Hynix — all crammed in through the front door of two supposedly broad funds. You’re not stock-picking, but the overlap means a small crowd of huge companies is quietly running a big chunk of the show. And since only top-10 ETF positions are captured, the real overlap is higher than what you see. This is the classic index-fund illusion: looks diversified on the fund layer, but peel it back and the same handful of names are photobombing everything.
Factors
Factor-wise, this portfolio is aggressively… average. Value, size, momentum, quality, yield — all basically neutral, meaning it’s hugging the global market personality with no strong convictions. The one mild tilt is higher low volatility at 64%, which is like saying, “I want global equities, but maybe with slightly fewer heart attacks.” Factor exposure is basically the ingredient list explaining why performance behaves how it does; here, the ingredients say “vanilla index” with a hint of “please don’t swing too wildly.” It’s unintentionally sensible: no style bets, no heroics, just letting market caps steer the ship.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 60.00% 59.3% -
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Weight: 40.00% 40.7%
Risk contribution is refreshingly boring: 60% weight in international ETF giving 59.3% of the risk, 40% S&P 500 giving 40.7% of the risk. No sneaky culprit hiding in a corner blowing up volatility; everything is doing exactly as much damage as it says on the label. Risk/weight is basically 1:1 for both, so neither fund is secretly the troublemaker. This is what happens when a portfolio has only two giant, broad, liquid funds — no drama, no surprises, just big, blunt beta. If you’re looking for a forensic mystery, this risk breakdown is a very short book.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the efficient frontier chart, this portfolio is basically sitting right on the curve, which is annoyingly competent. The Sharpe ratio of 0.52 isn’t glamorous next to the optimal 0.83 or even the min-variance 0.67, but given it can only shuffle between two funds, it’s doing its job. The efficient frontier is just the best possible risk/return mix using what you already hold; being on it means the weights are at least mathematically sane. You’re not leaving much on the table from a pure optimization angle — the drag is more about the underlying building blocks, not how you combined them.
Dividends
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.00%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.50%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.90%
Dividend yield lands at 1.9%, which is basically a light snack, not an income plan. The international side is doing most of the heavy lifting at 2.5%, while the S&P 500 calmly mails in about 1%. This isn’t a “get paid to wait” setup; it’s more “rely on price growth and accept whatever yield falls out.” That’s normal for broad equity indexes, but anyone expecting juicy cash flow from this will be underwhelmed. The upside is there’s less temptation to chase yield traps — the portfolio sidesteps that mess simply by not trying very hard on income at all.
Ongoing product costs
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%
Costs are the one area where this portfolio is almost suspiciously competent. A total expense ratio of 0.04% is basically free in human terms. You’re paying four cents a year for every $100 to own the bulk of the investable world. That’s less than most people pay in checking account nonsense fees without blinking. It also means there’s nowhere to hide if performance lags — you can’t blame the bill when the bill is this tiny. Fees are under control; if anything went right here by design or accident, it’s this.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
Compare your holdings
How much do the funds you hold actually overlap with the ones people weigh them against?
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey