Momentum chasing value hoarding mega cap worship with a shiny gold side quest
Report created on Aug 22, 2026Risk profile
5/7
Diversification profile
3/5
Positions
-
SP Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
SPMO - US46138E3392 40.00% -
DF Dimensional International Value ETF
DFIV - US25434V8072 25.00% -
GD WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
GDE - US97717Y5684 20.00% -
EM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China
EMXC - US46434G7640 15.00%
This portfolio looks like someone mashed together three half‑finished ideas and then duct‑taped on a gold gimmick. Nearly half is a pure momentum engine, a quarter is hardcore international value, another fifth is a “gold plus equities” science experiment, and the rest is emerging markets ex China for spice. Structurally it’s basically one big equity bet with different flavors pretending to be diversification. It’s not chaos, but it’s definitely vibes‑first, theory‑second. The big picture: one dominant core driver, two chunky sidecars, and almost no true ballast. When everything points in one direction (risk-on equities), it doesn’t matter how clever the labels sound — it moves like one big bet.
Growth
Historically, this thing absolutely ripped: 22.9% CAGR versus 14.9% for the US market and 13.9% globally. That’s “look at my chart” performance, not “this will age well” performance. CAGR — compound annual growth rate — is basically your average speed over a messy road trip, and this trip was fast. The max drawdown of about -23% was roughly market‑like, so you took similar pain but got a lot more payoff. But the catch: most of the gains came from a tiny number of days — 28 days did 90% of the work. That’s not a smooth ride; that’s a slot machine that happened to pay out lately. Past data here is yesterday’s weather, not a prophecy.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection basically says, “Congrats on your hot streak, now welcome back to earth.” Monte Carlo is just a nerdy way of running thousands of what‑if scenarios using the past as a loose template. Median outcome: $1,000 drifts to around $2,722 over 15 years — fine, but nowhere near the historical rocket ship. The wide range ($1,074 to $7,072) shows how sensitive a momentum‑heavy, stock‑only portfolio is to future mood swings. About three‑quarters of simulations end positive, which is decent, but not “can’t lose” territory. The story: the backtest looks like a highlight reel, the simulation looks like regular sports — messy, uncertain, and not nearly as heroic.
Asset classes
- Stocks 102%
Asset class breakdown: this isn’t a portfolio, it’s an equity cosplay. Stocks at 102% basically screams “all gas, no brakes,” with the tiny “plus gold” piece more marketing than meaningful diversification. There’s no real shock absorber — no bonds, no cash buffer worth mentioning, nothing that behaves differently when markets collectively throw a tantrum. When the only tool in the toolbox is equities, every problem looks like “hold on and hope.” It’s great when markets trend up and your risk tolerance is feeling brave, but structurally this is one‑dimensional. Diversification across labels of stock funds still leaves you with… just stocks.
Sectors
- Technology 37%
- Financials 16%
- Industrials 10%
- Telecommunications 7%
- Energy 7%
- Health Care 6%
- Consumer Discretionary 5%
- Basic Materials 5%
- Consumer Staples 4%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 1%
Sector-wise, it’s tech‑tilted in that classic “I like returns and I’m pretending that’s a strategy” way. About 37% in technology means a big chunk of your fate is tied to one growth‑driven part of the market that loves booms and hates interest rate reality checks. Financials at 16% and industrials at 10% soften it a bit, but this still walks and quacks like a growth‑leaning portfolio dressed in value language. The “efficient gold plus equity” sleeve adds some non‑tech flavor, but the look‑through names scream chips, semis, and high‑beta stories. When one sector dominates the mood, the whole portfolio catches the same cold.
Regions
- North America 63%
- Europe Developed 15%
- Asia Developed 9%
- Japan 5%
- Asia Emerging 3%
- Africa/Middle East 2%
- Australasia 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, this is “US plus some international seasoning,” not truly global. About 63% in North America leads the parade, with the rest scattered thinly over Europe, Japan, and bits of Asia, Africa, and Latin America. It looks diversified on a map, but the weight of the US still calls the shots. The emerging markets ex China piece is a cute twist — it’s like attending the party but deliberately skipping one of the main guests. The result is a portfolio heavily anchored to one economic and policy regime. When that region sneezes, the rest of this allocation does not politely ignore it.
Market capitalization
- Large-cap 45%
- Mega-cap 43%
- Mid-cap 14%
On market cap, this is a textbook mega‑cap worship session: 43% mega, 45% large, and mid caps just tossed a 14% consolation prize. That means the portfolio is basically ruled by the market’s current royalty — big, famous companies whose stock prices already reflect a lot of optimism or fear. It’s less “broad market exposure” and more “whatever dominates the headlines.” The upside is liquidity and stability compared to tiny names; the downside is you’re shackled to whatever big‑cap narrative the market is obsessed with. If leadership changes to smaller companies, this mix will be slow to notice and slower to benefit.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 5.30%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
- WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 4.58%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
- WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 3.21%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
- WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
-
AV Broadcom Inc 3.20%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
- WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 2.90%
Part of fund(s):- iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China
-
JN Johnson & Johnson 1.75%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
AM Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.62%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
AA Apple Inc 1.55%
Part of fund(s):- WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
-
LR Lam Research Corp 1.45%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.37%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
- Top 10 total 26.93%
The look‑through holdings scream “semiconductor cult with supporting characters.” NVIDIA, Micron, Broadcom, TSMC, AMD, Lam Research — this is less a diversified equity portfolio and more a love letter to the chip supply chain. Alphabet shows up twice via both share classes, which is a neat trick for concentration without looking like it. With only top‑10 ETF holdings visible, this is the tip of the iceberg, so real overlap is likely worse. Hidden duplication means several ETFs are quietly owning the same stars, turning what looks like four different strategies into a crowded fan club for a handful of tech darlings.
Factors
Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.
Factor exposure here is hilariously conflicted: high value (71%) and high momentum (70%) at the same time — like trying to eat keto and all‑carb simultaneously. Factors are the hidden “flavors” of your portfolio: value, momentum, size, quality, yield, low volatility. High momentum means you’re chasing recent winners; high value means you’re supposedly bargain‑hunting. Together, it’s an odd cocktail that can shine when markets reward both trends and cheapness, but it can also get whipsawed when leadership flips. Size is low, so you’re leaning into bigger companies by default. Quality, yield, and low vol are all near neutral, so there’s no built‑in safety net when the party ends.
Risk contribution
-
Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
Weight: 40.00% 42.2% -
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
Weight: 20.00% 24.7% -
Dimensional International Value ETF
Weight: 25.00% 19.0% -
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China
Weight: 15.00% 14.2%
Risk contribution exposes who’s actually driving the drama, and it’s pretty concentrated. The momentum ETF is 40% of the weight but 42% of the risk — the main character and it knows it. The gold‑plus‑equity fund is 20% weight but nearly 25% of risk, doing more heavy lifting than its share suggests. Top three positions together generate about 86% of total risk, so the other pieces are basically background extras. Risk contribution is like seeing who in the band is really making the noise — and here, two funds and a value sleeve are playing lead guitar while everything else gently hums along.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the efficient frontier chart, this portfolio actually behaves itself, which is mildly annoying for roasting. It sits on or very near the frontier, meaning that with these specific ingredients, the current mix is roughly making the most of the risk it’s taking. The Sharpe ratio — return per unit of volatility — is solid at 1.03, and not dramatically below the max‑Sharpe or min‑variance options. Translation: for this exact lineup of funds, the proportions aren’t obviously dumb. It’s still an all‑equity roller coaster with concentration issues, but at least the roller coaster is engineered decently rather than bolted together in a parking lot.
Dividends
- Dimensional International Value ETF 2.50%
- iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China 2.00%
- WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund 3.80%
- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.70%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.96%
The yield at about 1.96% is a lukewarm attempt at income dressed up with a gold‑flavored ETF. One fund throws off 3.8%, the value and EM sleeves add modest income, and momentum shows up with a 0.7% “I don’t do dividends, I do vibes” attitude. This is clearly a total‑return portfolio where dividends are more side effect than strategy. Nothing wrong with that, but anyone hoping this setup “pays them to wait” is mostly being paid in hope and price swings. In downturns, that sub‑2% yield isn’t cushioning much; it’s more a light tip than a paycheck.
Ongoing product costs
- Dimensional International Value ETF 0.27%
- iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China 0.25%
- WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund 0.20%
- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.13%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.20%
Costs are actually suspiciously reasonable: a blended TER around 0.20% is the one area where this portfolio isn’t trying to outsmart itself. For a mix of factor, international, emerging, and a weird gold overlay, that’s pretty restrained. Think of TER (total expense ratio) as an annual cover charge — here it’s more like a cheap ticket than bottle‑service pricing. You’re not bleeding performance just to keep the lights on. So yes, the structure is concentrated, factor‑confused, and sector‑tilted, but at least you’re not overpaying for the privilege. Fees are under control — possibly by accident, but still.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
Compare your holdings
How much do the funds you hold actually overlap with the ones people weigh them against?
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey