This portfolio has only about 1.9 years of historical data, based on the youngest asset in the portfolio. Some metrics, projections, and AI insights may be less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.
Get this analysis for your own portfolio Paste your holdings — the first report is free and takes about a minute. Analyze mine

A high octane equity tilted portfolio with strong factors and thoughtful diversification across the globe

Report created on Dec 17, 2025

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

5/5
Highly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification
Curious how your own portfolio scores? Same analysis, your holdings. First report free — no card needed. Analyze mine

Positions

This portfolio is built mostly from equity index and factor ETFs, with a small slice in bonds and alternatives. Around 89% sits in stocks, 8% in “other” assets like gold and bitcoin, and 3% in bonds, which is more aggressive than a typical balanced benchmark that might hold 40% or more in bonds. This stock‑heavy mix is what drives higher growth potential but also bumpier rides. Given the stated “balanced” profile, the structure leans closer to growth than classic balance. If a smoother experience is important, shifting a bit more into high‑quality bonds or cash‑like assets could better match the risk label while still keeping long‑term growth in focus.

Growth Info

The historic performance numbers are eye‑catching: a CAGR of 23.28% means a hypothetical $10,000 could have grown to about $28,600 over 5 years, if that rate held. The max drawdown of only -16.36% is relatively mild for an equity‑heavy mix, and aligns well with efficient risk taking. Also, 90% of returns coming from just 18 days shows how “lumpy” markets can be: missing a few big up days can massively hurt results. It’s important to remember that such high past returns are unlikely to persist forever; they should be viewed as a nice upside surprise, not a baseline expectation going forward.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis suggests a wide range of possible futures. Monte Carlo means the system ran 1,000 “what if” paths using patterns from past data, then estimated end values. The median path (50th percentile) shows roughly 2,391% growth, while even the 5th percentile still ends above 500%, and almost all simulations were positive. The blended simulated return of 28.62% is very high and reflects a historically favorable period for risk assets. Simulations are helpful for understanding uncertainty, but they lean heavily on the past; structural shifts, policy changes, or long flat markets would not be fully captured, so these projections should be seen as rough guideposts, not promises.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    89%
  • Other
    8%
  • Bonds
    3%

Across asset classes, the portfolio is strongly tilted toward equities, with only 3% in bonds and 8% in alternatives like gold, bitcoin, and CLOs. Most balanced benchmarks would carry a much larger fixed‑income slice to dampen volatility and provide ballast in equity downturns. The upside is strong growth potential and inflation protection from stocks and real assets; the downside is deeper drawdowns if stocks hit a rough patch. This allocation is well‑balanced and aligns closely with global standards on the equity side, but more safety assets could help. Anyone wanting a gentler ride might shift some equity or alternatives into higher‑quality, shorter‑duration bonds or cash‑like instruments.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    21%
  • Financials
    19%
  • Industrials
    12%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    10%
  • Telecommunications
    7%
  • Energy
    5%
  • Health Care
    5%
  • Basic Materials
    4%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is broad: roughly 21% technology, 19% financials, 12% industrials, and 10% consumer cyclicals, with meaningful slices in communication services, energy, and healthcare. This spread across 10 sectors is a strong indicator of diversification, and your sector mix broadly resembles major global benchmarks. The tech and cyclical tilt can drive strong returns when growth and risk appetite are healthy but can feel rougher during rate hikes or recessions. This allocation is well‑balanced and aligns closely with global standards, while still benefiting from some factor tilts like value and momentum under the hood. If smoother sector behavior is desired, trimming more cyclical exposure in favor of defensive sectors might slightly steady performance.

Regions Info

  • North America
    63%
  • Europe Developed
    11%
  • Japan
    4%
  • Asia Emerging
    4%
  • Asia Developed
    4%
  • Australasia
    2%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, about 63% is in North America with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, other developed Asia, and emerging markets. This looks quite similar to many global equity benchmarks that are naturally U.S.‑heavy, so the alignment here is strong. This portfolio’s geographic diversification is impressive and reduces dependence on any single country or region. Still, the U.S. tilt means outcomes are tied closely to U.S. economic and policy conditions. For investors wanting a more even global balance, slightly increasing non‑U.S. broad exposure or trimming some U.S. factor funds could nudge the split closer to a 50/50 U.S.–international style while still keeping the strengths of current holdings.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    30%
  • Large-cap
    23%
  • Mid-cap
    15%
  • Small-cap
    12%
  • Micro-cap
    9%

Market cap exposure ranges from mega caps (30%) and large caps (23%) down through mid (15%), small (12%), and micro caps (9%). This is more size‑diversified than many plain‑vanilla benchmarks, which tend to be dominated by mega and large caps. The strong tilt toward small and micro caps can enhance long‑term return potential, since smaller companies historically have offered higher growth but more volatility. That extra 20%+ in smaller names can make the portfolio more sensitive to economic cycles and liquidity stress. One way to dial in comfort is to decide whether this size tilt is intentional; if it feels too bumpy, shifting a bit from small/value toward broader large‑cap exposure can steady swings.

Redundant positions Info

  • iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
    Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

Several holdings are highly correlated: the U.S. quality GARP ETF, the S&P 500 momentum ETF, and the total U.S. market ETF tend to move together. Correlation simply means how often things move in the same direction; near‑1.0 correlation cuts into diversification gains, especially when markets drop. The note that overlapping assets bring limited diversification benefits is spot on. Keeping different styles is useful, but holding multiple funds that behave similarly can clutter the lineup without adding much. If simplicity or efficiency is a goal, trimming one or two of the U.S. large‑cap growth/momentum funds and boosting either defensive assets or truly distinct strategies could clean up the structure while preserving the core exposure.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

Efficient Frontier analysis suggests this mix could be tweaked to get more return for the same risk. The Efficient Frontier is the set of portfolios that give the best possible trade‑off between risk (volatility) and return, given the chosen ingredients. Here, a more efficient version using the same building blocks shows an expected return of about 8.20% at the current risk level, and an “optimal” portfolio with 8.20% return but only 1.65% risk. “Efficient” in this context just means best risk‑return ratio, not necessarily best for taxes, values, or simplicity. The key takeaway is that trimming overlapping, highly correlated holdings and reweighting among existing ETFs could make the ride smoother or slightly boost expected returns without adding new products.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF 3.30%
  • Avantis® Emerging Markets Equity ETF 2.70%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.60%
  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 1.70%
  • Janus Detroit Street Trust - Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF 5.30%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.70%
  • iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF 0.30%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.55%

The total yield of about 1.55% is modest, which fits a growth‑tilted portfolio focused more on price appreciation than income. Some components, like international small value and emerging markets, offer yields above 2–3%, and the CLO ETF yields over 5%, which helps support cash flow. Others, like momentum and quality GARP, have very low yields, reflecting their growth‑oriented nature. For someone who cares more about total return than regular income, this setup is reasonable. If steady income becomes a higher priority later, shifting part of the equity slice toward higher‑yielding equity or bond funds, or increasing the allocation to the existing income‑producing bond/credit ETF, could raise the overall yield meaningfully.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF 0.36%
  • Avantis® Emerging Markets Equity ETF 0.33%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust 0.25%
  • SPDR Gold Mini Shares 0.10%
  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 0.25%
  • Janus Detroit Street Trust - Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF 0.21%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.13%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.15%

The overall total expense ratio (TER) of around 0.15% is impressively low for such a factor‑rich, globally diversified portfolio. Plain market‑cap index funds at Vanguard are extremely cheap, and even the factor and emerging markets funds are reasonably priced compared with active alternatives. Lower costs matter because they compound over time; every extra 0.5% per year in fees is like running with a small headwind. Your cost structure strongly supports better long‑term performance and compares favorably to many advisor‑managed portfolios. To push costs even lower, consolidating overlapping U.S. exposures into fewer core ETFs could shave a few basis points, but the current TER is already in a very healthy, investor‑friendly range.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

Compare your holdings

How much do the funds you hold actually overlap with the ones people weigh them against?

AVUV vs SPMO AVDV vs VOO IDMO vs SPMO DRAM vs SPMO

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey