Broad low-cost equity portfolio with modest bond buffer and strong tilt toward smaller company stocks
Report created on Apr 26, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
VO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
VOO - US9229083632 30.00% -
VX Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund ETF Shares
VXF - US9229086528 30.00% -
VX Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
VXUS - US9219097683 30.00% -
BN Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund ETF Shares
BND - US9219378356 10.00%
This portfolio is built from four broad Vanguard index ETFs, with 90% in stocks and 10% in bonds. The stock side is split evenly between large US companies, smaller US companies, and international stocks, each at 30%. The 10% bond slice adds a small stabilizing layer but does not dominate the mix. Structurally, this is a simple “core and satellites” layout using only broad, diversified funds. That simplicity is helpful because the main drivers of performance are easy to understand: global equities do the heavy lifting, while the bond position modestly dampens volatility and adds income without changing the portfolio’s overall growth-focused character.
Growth
From 2016 to 2026, a $1,000 investment in this portfolio grew to about $2,988, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.63%. CAGR is like average speed on a road trip: it smooths out all the bumps into one yearly growth number. Over the same period, the US market grew faster at 15.01%, and the global market at 12.37%, so the portfolio slightly lagged both. The worst peak‑to‑trough drop was about –34%, similar to the benchmarks, and it recovered within five months. This shows a growth profile that participates fully in big drawdowns but slightly trails in long‑run upside versus pure equity benchmarks.
Projection
The forward projection uses a Monte Carlo simulation, which is basically a thousand randomized “what if” futures based on past return and volatility patterns. Starting from $1,000 over 15 years, the median result lands around $2,681, with a wide range from roughly $985 to $7,127 between the 5th and 95th percentiles. That spread illustrates how uncertain markets can be: outcomes cluster around the middle but tails are meaningful. About 74% of simulations end positive, and the average simulated annual return is 7.67%. These numbers are not forecasts or promises; they just show what could happen if future markets behave somewhat like the past but with plenty of randomness.
Asset classes
- Stocks 90%
- Bonds 10%
With 90% in stocks and 10% in bonds, the asset‑class mix leans clearly toward growth rather than capital preservation. Compared with many “balanced” mixes, which often hold much more in bonds, this allocation is closer to a growth‑heavy baseline. Equities tend to drive long‑term returns but also create larger swings, while bonds usually provide steadier income and smaller price moves. Here, the 10% bond slice offers only limited cushioning during equity sell‑offs but still contributes yield. Overall, the asset split suggests performance will mostly track global stock markets, with the bond allocation playing a supporting rather than starring role in the risk and return profile.
Sectors
- Technology 20%
- Financials 15%
- Industrials 13%
- Health Care 9%
- Consumer Discretionary 9%
- Telecommunications 6%
- Energy 4%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Consumer Staples 4%
- Real Estate 3%
- Utilities 2%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Sector exposure is fairly diversified across the economy, with the largest share in technology at about 20%, followed by financials, industrials, health care, and consumer‑related sectors. This pattern is broadly consistent with broad market indices where tech and financials are usually among the biggest slices. A tech weight around one‑fifth is meaningful but not extreme, so the portfolio does benefit from innovation‑driven growth while not being overly dependent on a single industry. In general, this spread across cyclical and defensive sectors helps smooth results because different areas of the market react differently to interest rates, inflation, and economic growth cycles.
Regions
- North America 62%
- Europe Developed 11%
- Japan 5%
- Asia Developed 4%
- Asia Emerging 4%
- Australasia 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Geographically, around 62% of the portfolio is in North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, other developed Asia, and several emerging regions. That North American tilt is common in global portfolios, especially those anchored in US‑listed funds. The non‑US exposure, however, is still meaningful, roughly matching the inclusion of a broad international ETF. This mix means results are heavily influenced by US economic and policy conditions but not wholly dependent on them. The exposure to Europe, Asia, and emerging regions introduces additional growth drivers and currency influences, which can help when non‑US markets move differently from US equities.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 27%
- Large-cap 20%
- Mid-cap 19%
- Small-cap 16%
- Micro-cap 6%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Market capitalization exposure is spread across the spectrum: about 27% in mega‑caps, 20% in large‑caps, and a substantial 41% combined in mid‑, small‑, and micro‑caps. That’s a stronger tilt toward smaller companies than many traditional cap‑weighted benchmarks, which tend to be dominated by mega‑caps. Smaller and mid‑sized companies often show higher long‑term growth potential but come with more volatility and sometimes sharper drawdowns. This structure means portfolio behavior may differ from headline indices like the S&P 500, especially in periods when smaller companies either strongly outperform or underperform the largest global blue‑chip stocks.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 2.27%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AA Apple Inc 2.00%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 1.48%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.09%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1.04%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 0.90%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AV Broadcom Inc 0.79%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 0.72%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 0.67%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
TS Tesla Inc 0.56%
Part of fund(s):- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Top 10 total 11.51%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Looking through ETF top‑10 holdings, a handful of big names like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and major semiconductor and platform companies appear prominently, though total identified coverage is only about 16% of the portfolio. These companies each represent around 0.5–2.3% of the overall portfolio, so no single stock dominates the look‑through exposure. Because only top‑10 positions are captured, actual overlap is likely higher than reported, but still spread across many firms. This suggests broad diversification even among the largest holdings, with no obvious “hidden concentration” in one company, though performance will still be meaningfully linked to how these global leaders fare.
Factors
Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.
Factor exposure is fairly balanced overall, with notable mild tilts toward size and yield. A size score of 64% indicates a tilt toward smaller companies relative to a pure market‑cap baseline. Factor investing treats size as one of several traits that can influence returns and risk; historically, smaller firms have sometimes delivered higher returns but with bumpier rides. The yield factor at 60% shows a mild preference for higher‑dividend or income‑paying assets, consistent with the bond slice and some dividend‑paying stocks. Other factors such as value, momentum, quality, and low volatility sit near neutral, meaning the portfolio behaves broadly like the market on those characteristics.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 30.00% 39.0% -
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Weight: 30.00% 31.5% -
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 30.00% 28.9% -
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 10.00% 0.7%
Risk contribution highlights how much each holding drives the portfolio’s overall ups and downs, not just how big it is. Here, the three equity funds are each 30% by weight but together contribute over 99% of total risk, with the extended market ETF alone contributing about 39%. Its risk‑to‑weight ratio of 1.30 means it punches above its size in volatility impact, reflecting the greater variability of smaller and mid‑cap stocks. The bond fund, at 10% weight, adds less than 1% of the risk, with a very low risk‑to‑weight ratio. So, day‑to‑day behavior is almost entirely dictated by the equity slice, especially the smaller‑company allocation.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk‑return chart, the current portfolio sits below the efficient frontier by about 2.3 percentage points at its risk level. The efficient frontier represents the best expected return for each level of volatility using only these four funds in different mixes. A Sharpe ratio of 0.49 for the current portfolio, versus 0.81 for the maximum‑Sharpe mix, suggests there is room for a better risk‑adjusted trade‑off through reweighting. The minimum‑variance portfolio has much lower risk but also a much lower expected return and Sharpe. This means the chosen allocation is growth‑oriented but not fully optimized for the return it takes on, according to historical relationships.
Dividends
- Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund ETF Shares 3.90%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
- Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.80%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.89%
The overall dividend yield is about 1.89%, combining modest stock dividends with a higher 3.90% yield from the bond ETF and 2.80% from international stocks. Dividend yield is the annual cash payout as a percentage of price, like rental income from a property. In this portfolio, most of the long‑term return historically has come from price growth rather than income, which is typical for equity‑heavy allocations. Still, the bond and international components provide a meaningful slice of regular cash flow. Reinvesting these distributions can significantly boost compounded returns over time, even if the headline yield number looks relatively modest at first glance.
Ongoing product costs
- Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
- Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.06%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%
Total ongoing fund costs are very low, with a blended total expense ratio (TER) around 0.04%. TER is the annual fee charged by each ETF as a percentage of the invested amount, quietly deducted in the background. For context, this level of cost is substantially below many actively managed funds and even below plenty of other index products, which is a clear strength. Lower fees mean more of the portfolio’s gross return stays in the investor’s pocket each year, and that difference compounds meaningfully over long periods. From a cost perspective, the portfolio structure is highly efficient and well‑aligned with low‑cost investing principles.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey