This portfolio has only about 4.4 years of historical data, based on the youngest asset in the portfolio. Some metrics, projections, and AI insights may be less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.
Get this analysis for your own portfolio Paste your holdings — the first report is free and takes about a minute. Analyze mine

A high-risk portfolio with tech-heavy concentration and speculative growth potential

Report created on Apr 13, 2025

Risk profile Info

7/7
Speculative
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification
Curious how your own portfolio scores? Same analysis, your holdings. First report free — no card needed. Analyze mine

Positions

The portfolio is heavily weighted towards stocks, with significant allocations in ETFs like Invesco NASDAQ 100 and Vanguard S&P 500. This structure suggests a focus on growth through equity markets. Compared to a benchmark, the portfolio leans towards a higher concentration in technology stocks, which can lead to increased volatility. While the allocation provides substantial growth potential, it may not be ideal for those seeking income or stability. To enhance diversification, consider adding other asset classes like bonds or real estate, which could reduce risk and provide more balanced returns.

Growth Info

Historically, the portfolio has shown an impressive CAGR of 159.68%, indicating substantial growth. However, this performance comes with a significant risk, as evidenced by a max drawdown of -42.99%. The portfolio's returns are highly concentrated, with just seven days accounting for 90% of the gains. This suggests a reliance on market timing and high-growth periods. While past performance is impressive, it is crucial to remember that it does not guarantee future results. A more balanced approach might help mitigate the impact of market downturns and provide more consistent returns.

Projection Info

Monte Carlo simulations, which use historical data to predict future outcomes, suggest a wide range of potential returns. The 50th percentile projection indicates substantial growth, but the high variability highlights the speculative nature of the portfolio. While the simulations show a strong likelihood of positive returns, the inherent risk remains high. Investors should consider their risk tolerance and investment horizon when interpreting these projections. Diversifying into less volatile assets could stabilize future returns and reduce the impact of adverse market conditions.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

The portfolio is entirely composed of stocks, which can lead to higher volatility and risk. While this allocation offers significant growth potential, it lacks the balance provided by other asset classes like bonds or commodities. Compared to a diversified benchmark, this portfolio may experience more significant fluctuations in value. To improve risk-adjusted returns, consider incorporating different asset classes. This could provide a buffer against market downturns and enhance overall portfolio stability, aligning with long-term investment goals.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    53%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    16%
  • Telecommunications
    12%
  • Financials
    4%
  • Industrials
    4%
  • Health Care
    4%
  • Consumer Staples
    3%
  • Utilities
    1%
  • Basic Materials
    1%
  • Energy
    1%

With 53% allocated to technology, the portfolio is heavily concentrated in this sector. While tech stocks have driven impressive returns recently, they are also subject to higher volatility, especially during interest rate hikes or regulatory changes. Other sectors like consumer cyclicals and communication services add some diversification, but the overall balance remains skewed. To mitigate sector-specific risks, consider reducing the tech allocation and increasing exposure to sectors like healthcare or financial services, which may provide more stability and consistent returns.

Regions Info

  • North America
    73%
  • Europe Developed
    10%
  • Asia Emerging
    10%
  • Japan
    6%

The portfolio's geographic allocation is predominantly North American, with 73% exposure, which limits international diversification. While this has been beneficial given the strong performance of U.S. markets, it also increases vulnerability to region-specific risks. Underexposure to emerging markets and other developed regions can limit growth opportunities and diversification benefits. To enhance geographic diversification, consider increasing allocations to regions like Asia or Europe, which may offer different growth dynamics and reduce reliance on North American markets.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    52%
  • Large-cap
    35%
  • Mid-cap
    13%

The portfolio is heavily tilted towards mega and large-cap stocks, with 87% of the allocation in these categories. This focus on larger companies can provide stability and liquidity but may limit exposure to the growth potential of smaller firms. Compared to a market-cap-weighted benchmark, this allocation might miss opportunities in medium or small-cap stocks, which can offer higher growth prospects. To capture more diverse growth opportunities, consider increasing exposure to smaller companies, balancing the portfolio's risk and return profile.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

The portfolio could be optimized using the Efficient Frontier, which aims to achieve the best possible risk-return ratio. While the current portfolio's expected return is high, an optimized version could offer even better returns with a similar risk level. This optimization involves reallocating current assets to achieve a more efficient balance. However, it's important to note that efficiency focuses on risk-return ratios, not necessarily diversification. Consider exploring optimization strategies to enhance returns while maintaining acceptable risk levels.

Dividends Info

  • Dentsu Inc. 2.60%
  • iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF 2.60%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.70%
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 1.60%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.40%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.96%

The portfolio's dividend yield is relatively low at 0.96%, reflecting its growth-oriented nature. While dividends contribute to total returns, the focus here is on capital appreciation rather than income generation. For investors seeking regular income, this portfolio may not be ideal. To increase dividend income, consider reallocating some funds to high-dividend stocks or ETFs. This change can provide a more balanced return profile, appealing to those who value both growth and income.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF 0.51%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.09%

The portfolio's total expense ratio (TER) is impressively low at 0.09%, supporting better long-term performance by minimizing costs. This efficient cost structure aligns with best practices, allowing more of the portfolio's returns to be retained by the investor. Keeping costs low is crucial for maximizing net returns, especially in a high-risk portfolio. Continue monitoring and optimizing expenses to ensure they remain competitive. This focus on cost efficiency will contribute positively to long-term investment success.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

Compare your holdings

How much do the funds you hold actually overlap with the ones people weigh them against?

AVDV vs VOO QQQM vs SWPPX DRAM vs QQQM DRAM vs VOO

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey