Globally diversified equity and gold mix with efficient risk balance and moderate historical drawdowns
Report created on Jul 26, 2026Risk profile
3/7
Diversification profile
5/5
Positions
-
VW Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
VWRP - IE00BK5BQT80 69.19% -
IG iShares Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC
IGLG - IE000Q2P3ZQ3 30.81%
This portfolio is very simple structurally, with just two holdings doing all the work. Around 69% sits in a global equity ETF that tracks a broad world stock index, while roughly 31% is in a GBP‑hedged physical gold ETC. That means most of the growth potential comes from shares, but a sizeable slice is allocated to a non‑equity asset. A two‑fund structure is easy to understand and monitor, and this one still scores highly on diversification because the global ETF spreads across many companies and regions. The gold position adds a distinct return pattern, so the overall mix combines growth‑oriented assets with a different, more defensive element.
Growth
Over the period from mid‑2022 to mid‑2026, £1,000 in this portfolio grew to about £1,894. That implies a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 17.04%, meaning the money grew as if it earned about 17% per year on average. This beat both the US market and the broad global market benchmarks over the same timeframe. The maximum drawdown, or worst peak‑to‑trough fall, was around -10.82%, noticeably smaller than the deeper losses seen in the benchmarks. That combination of strong returns with relatively shallow drawdowns indicates the mix of equities and gold has historically smoothed some of the bumps while still capturing plenty of upside, though there’s no guarantee this pattern continues.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection looks ahead 15 years using thousands of simulated paths based on historical behaviour. Monte Carlo is a technique that runs many “what if” scenarios, randomly varying returns within a range informed by past data, to show a spread of possible outcomes rather than one forecast. Here, the median result turns £1,000 into about £2,652, with a wide central band from roughly £1,814 to £3,871. The annualised return across all simulations is 7.48%. These numbers don’t predict the future; they simply illustrate how volatile returns can compound over time and how outcomes can differ, even for the same starting portfolio.
Asset classes
- Stocks 69%
- No data 31%
On an asset‑class level, about 69% of the portfolio is clearly identified as stocks, with the remaining 31% flagged as “No data” in this view. “No data” just means the system doesn’t classify that slice by asset class, so the breakdown is incomplete rather than unusual. Even with that caveat, it’s clear that listed equities drive most of the long‑term growth potential. Stocks tend to be more volatile than cash or bonds but historically offer higher expected returns. The strong diversification score suggests that, within the equity sleeve, exposure is spread widely, which can help reduce the impact of any single company or theme on total portfolio behaviour.
Sectors
- Technology 22%
- Financials 11%
- Industrials 7%
- Consumer Discretionary 6%
- Health Care 6%
- Telecommunications 5%
- Consumer Staples 3%
- Energy 2%
- Basic Materials 2%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 1%
Within equities, technology is the largest sector at around 22%, followed by financials at 11%, then industrials, consumer discretionary, and healthcare in the mid‑single digits. The remaining sectors each hold smaller slices, but almost all major economic areas are represented. This broad spread is typical of global index‑style portfolios and generally aligns well with diversified benchmarks, which is a positive sign. A relatively higher technology allocation can boost returns during periods when innovative and growth‑oriented companies are in favour, but it can also mean sharper swings when interest rates rise or investor sentiment turns. The presence of more defensive sectors like consumer staples and utilities adds balance.
Regions
- North America 45%
- Europe Developed 10%
- Asia Developed 5%
- Japan 4%
- Asia Emerging 3%
- Australasia 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, the equity exposure tilts toward North America at about 45%, with Europe, developed Asia, Japan, and emerging regions making up the rest in smaller chunks. That pattern resembles many global indices, where North America, and especially the US, makes up a big share of world market value. This alignment with global standards is helpful because it avoids large unintended regional bets. At the same time, having material allocations to Europe, Asia, and emerging markets introduces different economic cycles, currencies, and policy environments into the mix. That diversity can help reduce the impact if any single region experiences a prolonged downturn relative to the others.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 33%
- Large-cap 24%
- Mid-cap 12%
By company size, roughly a third of the equity exposure is in mega‑cap firms, about a quarter in large‑caps, and around 12% in mid‑caps, with smaller companies making up the rest outside the visible breakdown. This pattern is typical of a market‑capitalisation‑weighted global index, where the biggest companies naturally take up the most space. Mega‑caps often bring more stable business models and deeper liquidity, which can moderate volatility. Mid‑caps can add a bit more growth potential and idiosyncratic behaviour. This blend means the portfolio participates strongly in the performance of the largest global players while still keeping some exposure to the “middle tier” of the market.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 3.09%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
AA Apple Inc. 2.77%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 1.83%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.53%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.38%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1.22%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.16%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.11%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 0.86%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 0.82%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- Top 10 total 15.78%
Looking through to the underlying holdings, the largest visible company exposures are familiar global names such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Taiwan Semiconductor. Each individual name accounts for only a few percent of the overall portfolio, because they are held inside a diversified ETF. Some companies, like Alphabet with both Class A and Class C shares, appear more than once, which slightly boosts effective concentration in that business. Overlap across ETFs is modest here because there is only one equity fund, so hidden duplication is limited. It’s worth noting that this look‑through view only covers ETF top‑10 holdings, so actual diversification is broader than these numbers alone suggest.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
Weight: 69.19% 67.7% -
iShares Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC
Weight: 30.81% 32.3%
Risk contribution shows how much each holding drives the portfolio’s ups and downs, which can differ from its weight. Here, the global equity ETF is about 69% of the allocation and contributes roughly 68% of total risk, while the gold ETC is about 31% of the allocation and contributes around 32% of risk. The risk/weight ratios are close to 1, meaning neither holding is disproportionately volatile relative to its size. This balance suggests that risk is broadly in line with capital allocation, without a small position unexpectedly dominating overall volatility. For a two‑asset mix, that’s a simple, intuitive structure where each holding’s influence is easy to understand.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
The efficient frontier analysis compares different mixes of the existing holdings and looks at their risk versus expected return. The current portfolio sits on or very near this frontier, which means that, for its level of volatility, it’s already using these two building blocks in a highly efficient way. The Sharpe ratio, a measure of return per unit of risk, is 1.23 for the current mix, compared with 1.52 at the maximum‑Sharpe point and 1.49 at the minimum‑variance point. Those higher figures show there are mathematically more “optimal” blends, but the gap is small. Overall, this confirms the existing allocation is already well‑balanced.
Ongoing product costs
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.13%
The ongoing charges on this portfolio are very low. The global equity ETF has a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, and the blended portfolio TER is about 0.13%. TER represents the annual percentage cost charged by the funds, taken from assets rather than billed separately. Over a single year, differences of a few tenths of a percent may feel small, but over decades they compound significantly. Low costs leave more of the gross return in the portfolio rather than flowing out in fees. For a globally diversified structure, having expenses at this level is impressively lean and provides a solid foundation for long‑term compounding.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey