A broadly diversified equity portfolio with strong growth orientation and modest tilt toward midcap momentum
Report created on Dec 16, 2025Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
VT Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
VTI - US9229087690 50.00% -
VX Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
VXUS - US9219097683 30.00% -
XM Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
XMMO - US46137V4648 20.00%
The structure is straightforward and clean: roughly half in a broad domestic stock fund, about a third in broad international stocks, and the rest in a focused midcap momentum ETF. That means almost everything is in equities, with only a tiny cash slice, which lines up with a growth‑tilted balanced profile. This kind of setup is easy to maintain and aligns well with common benchmark mixes that favor total market exposure. To keep things on track, it can help to define a simple rebalancing rule, like checking once or twice a year whether the midcap or international piece has drifted too far from the intended weights.
Growth
Historically, the portfolio shows a strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 14.2%. CAGR is basically the “average speed” of growth per year, smoothing out the bumps along the way. A hypothetical $10,000 could have grown to around $37,000 over ten years at that pace, clearly ahead of many balanced benchmarks over similar periods. The max drawdown of about ‑35% shows it can fall hard during big market shocks, similar to an all‑equity index. While this backward‑looking data is encouraging and indicates solid alignment with broad equity markets, it’s important to remember that past returns and drawdowns don’t guarantee anything about the next decade.
Projection
The Monte Carlo analysis ran 1,000 simulations based on historical patterns, estimating a wide range of future outcomes. Monte Carlo is like rolling the dice on many alternate market histories: it shuffles past return and volatility behavior to see what could happen, not what will happen. Here, the median outcome at about 476% and a 5th percentile around 87% show that most paths are positive, but there is still clear downside risk. With 992 of 1,000 runs ending above the starting value, the growth potential looks strong. Even so, results depend heavily on past data, so it’s smart to treat these numbers as rough guideposts, not promises.
Asset classes
- Stocks 99%
- Cash 1%
Almost the entire allocation sits in stocks, with about 99% in equities and 1% in cash. That’s aggressive compared with many “balanced” benchmarks, which often hold meaningful bonds or other stabilizing assets. The upside is clear: higher expected long‑term growth and a simple, low‑cost structure. The trade‑off is larger swings in value during market downturns, as there’s little built‑in cushion from defensive asset classes. This is well‑aligned for someone comfortable with volatility and a long time horizon. If future stability needs increase, adding a small slice of lower‑risk assets over time could help gradually smooth the ride without completely sacrificing the growth profile.
Sectors
- Technology 26%
- Financials 15%
- Industrials 15%
- Consumer Discretionary 10%
- Health Care 8%
- Telecommunications 7%
- Consumer Staples 6%
- Utilities 4%
- Energy 4%
- Basic Materials 3%
- Real Estate 3%
Sector exposure is nicely spread: technology leads, followed by financials and industrials, with meaningful weight in consumer, healthcare, and other areas. This mix looks similar to broad global equity benchmarks, which naturally lean heavier into tech and financials given their market size. A technology‑tilted portfolio can grow quickly in favorable environments but may swing more when interest rates move or when growth stocks fall out of favor. The presence of all major sectors is a strong diversification signal and helps reduce the risk of any one industry dominating outcomes. Periodically checking that no single sector becomes overwhelmingly large can help keep risk balanced as markets evolve.
Regions
- North America 72%
- Europe Developed 11%
- Asia Emerging 5%
- Japan 5%
- Asia Developed 4%
- Australasia 1%
- Latin America 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
Geographically, the portfolio is anchored in North America at around 72%, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, other developed Asia, and smaller allocations to emerging markets and other regions. This is quite similar to common global benchmarks that naturally lean toward U.S. markets due to their size and depth. The strong U.S. tilt has been a tailwind over the last decade, supporting the high historical CAGR. At the same time, having meaningful non‑U.S. exposure helps lower home‑country risk and introduce different growth drivers. Keeping this global mix broadly in line with world market weights is a solid approach, while small adjustments can reflect personal comfort with international volatility.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 35%
- Mid-cap 25%
- Large-cap 24%
- Small-cap 13%
- Micro-cap 1%
Market cap exposure is well spread: a core in mega and large caps, plus healthy allocations to mid and small caps, with only a tiny slice in micro. Large and mega companies tend to be more stable and benchmark‑like, while mid and small caps often offer higher growth potential but with bumpier rides. The added midcap momentum tilt increases sensitivity to market cycles, especially when smaller or more dynamic companies move sharply. This blend looks thoughtfully diversified versus typical index portfolios that sometimes lean even more heavily into mega caps. Checking that mid and small caps don’t dominate after strong runs can help maintain a comfortable volatility level.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On a risk‑return chart known as the Efficient Frontier, this mix would likely sit near the upper band for an equity‑heavy portfolio, thanks to its broad diversification and low fees. The Efficient Frontier represents the best possible trade‑off between volatility and expected return using the existing building blocks. Tweaking the weights among the three current funds could slightly reduce risk or slightly boost expected return, but it wouldn’t change the basic all‑equity character. It’s worth thinking about whether the main goal is maximizing growth, smoothing volatility, or somewhere in between, then nudging allocations within these funds—or eventually adding a stabilizing asset—so the overall position best matches that comfort zone.
Dividends
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
- Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF 0.70%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.50%
The portfolio’s total yield around 1.5% is modest but reasonable for a growth‑oriented equity mix. Yield is the cash income you receive from dividends relative to your investment amount. The international fund’s higher yield helps lift overall income, while the domestic total market and midcap momentum pieces naturally offer less, reflecting their growth focus. For long‑term accumulators, reinvesting these dividends can quietly boost compounding over time. For someone relying on portfolio income today, this level of yield means most return is expected from price growth, not cash payouts. In that case, combining this equity mix with some higher‑income or lower‑volatility components might better support predictable withdrawals.
Ongoing product costs
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
- Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF 0.34%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.10%
The overall cost picture is excellent, with a blended total expense ratio (TER) of around 0.10%. TER is like a small annual membership fee charged by the funds, and lower costs leave more of the market’s return in your pocket. The two broad index funds are extremely cheap and align well with best‑practice guidance for long‑term investors. The midcap momentum fund costs more, but that’s typical for more specialized strategies, and its small slice keeps overall costs very competitive. This cost structure strongly supports long‑term performance and is a real strength. Periodically checking for cheaper but equivalent options can help keep the fee edge as markets evolve.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey