Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

High growth equity portfolio concentrated in US tech and select international stocks

Report created on Dec 13, 2025

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The portfolio is highly concentrated in equities with six positions dominated by two single stocks and two ETFs each holding roughly 11–23% of the weight. Compared to a broad global equity benchmark this is far more concentrated in specific themes and single names rather than a broad market cap weighted mix. Concentration matters because large single-name or thematic weights can drive much of the portfolio’s return and risk. Recommendation: reduce single-stock and theme concentration by trimming the largest positions or consolidating overlapping ETFs into a single broad low-cost core holding to lower idiosyncratic risk.

Growth Info

Using a hypothetical $10,000 initial investment the portfolio’s reported CAGR is 15.12% and a maximum drawdown of -32.03% shows it fell sharply in at least one stress period. CAGR, or Compound Annual Growth Rate, measures average yearly growth like an “average speed” over a trip. The drawdown metric highlights potential capital loss during downturns. Compared with a broad equity benchmark the CAGR appears strong but the deep drawdown and the fact that 90% of returns came from just 22 days imply return concentration. Recommendation: assess risk tolerance for large swings and consider smoothing with diversification or partial hedges.

Projection Info

A Monte Carlo simulation was run with 1,000 paths to estimate possible future outcomes using historical return distributions. Monte Carlo means simulating many random future paths based on past volatility to show a range of outcomes; it does not predict the future. Results show a wide spread with a 5th percentile loss of -27.5% and a median cumulative gain of 342.7% over the horizon reported, and 904 of 1,000 simulations positive. Limitations: these projections assume historical relationships and volatility persist; unexpected regime shifts or new events can produce very different outcomes. Recommendation: use simulation as a planning guide not a certainty.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

The portfolio is 100% equities with no allocation to bonds, cash, or alternatives. That makes it more aggressive than typical balanced portfolios that include fixed income to reduce volatility. Asset class mix is a primary driver of portfolio risk and return because stocks generally offer higher long-term returns but also higher drawdowns than bonds. Recommendation: if the investor’s horizon or risk tolerance is shorter than very long term, introduce a small allocation to fixed income or cash equivalents to reduce short-term volatility and provide liquidity for rebalancing during downturns.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    42%
  • Industrials
    23%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    18%
  • Telecommunications
    5%
  • Financials
    3%
  • Health Care
    3%
  • Consumer Staples
    2%
  • Energy
    1%
  • Utilities
    1%
  • Basic Materials
    1%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector exposure tilts heavily to Technology at 42% with Industrials and Consumer Cyclicals also significant. This is more concentrated in a few sectors than many broad benchmarks where sector weights are more even. Sector concentration can amplify returns in favorable cycles and increase volatility in adverse periods; for example technology-heavy allocations may be sensitive to interest rate shifts and regulatory actions. Recommendation: rebalance toward a broader sector mix by trimming overweight sectors or adding exposure to underrepresented areas to improve resilience across different economic environments.

Regions Info

  • North America
    59%
  • Japan
    23%
  • Asia Developed
    14%
  • Europe Developed
    2%
  • Asia Emerging
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geographic exposure is heavily skewed to North America at 59% with Japan at 23% and developed Asia 14%, and minimal emerging market exposure. Compared to many global benchmarks this is overweight the U.S. and underweight emerging markets and Europe. Geographic concentration can reduce diversification benefits since regions perform differently across cycles. Recommendation: consider modest increases to underrepresented regions to capture different growth drivers and currency diversification while keeping overall risk within the growth profile.

Market capitalization Info

  • Large-cap
    50%
  • Mega-cap
    33%
  • Mid-cap
    12%
  • Small-cap
    4%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

Market capitalization tilts toward large and mega caps with 83% combined (Big 50% Mega 33%) and limited small and micro cap exposure. Large-cap orientation typically reduces idiosyncratic risk and volatility relative to small caps but may limit exposure to higher growth opportunities that smaller companies can offer. For diversification and capture of different return drivers, a balanced market cap exposure often combines large cap stability with some mid/small cap growth. Recommendation: if seeking higher long-term return potential accept a modest increase in mid/small cap exposure while monitoring volatility.

Redundant positions Info

  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

The portfolio contains highly correlated holdings notably between the two Vanguard broad market ETFs which overlap substantially. Correlation measures how assets move together where +1 means identical movement and 0 means no relation; high correlation limits diversification because holdings will fall together in stress periods. This concentration in overlapping products reduces the benefit of having multiple similar funds. Recommendation: remove redundant holdings and replace them with assets that exhibit low or negative correlation to existing positions to improve true diversification and lower portfolio variance.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

Optimization notes indicate an improved Efficient Frontier outcome if overlapping assets are removed. The Efficient Frontier is a theoretical set of portfolios offering the highest expected return for a given level of risk; it’s constructed from current asset returns and covariances. Here the suggested optimal mix using only current investable assets shows higher expected return at a specified risk level but relies on reallocating existing holdings only. Recommendation: before pursuing mathematical optimization, first remove redundant correlated positions, then run rebalancing to move closer to the efficient frontier while respecting investment goals and constraints.

Dividends Info

  • Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 1.30%
  • Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF 0.60%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
  • Sony Group Corp 0.60%
  • Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 1.60%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.85%

Dividend yield across holdings is modest with a portfolio yield around 0.85% and individual positions ranging from 0.5% to 1.6%. Dividend yield is the annual dividend income divided by price and can provide steady income and some downside cushioning, but for a growth profile dividends are a smaller component of total return. Recommendation: if income is a priority shift a portion to higher-yielding, high-quality dividend payers or yield-focused funds; otherwise keep low-yield growth assets and reinvest distributions to compound returns.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF 0.58%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.07%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.17%

Total reported TER, or Total Expense Ratio, is 0.17% which is low overall and aligns well with best practice for core ETF holdings. TER is the annual fee charged by funds expressed as a percentage of assets under management and acts like a recurring drag on returns over time. However one holding stands out with a higher cost at 0.58% which, given its large weight, meaningfully raises average portfolio expenses. Recommendation: retain low-cost Vanguard core ETFs for the base allocation and consider replacing or trimming the higher-cost ETF to improve long-term net returns.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey