Get this analysis for your own portfolio Paste your holdings — the first report is free and takes about a minute. Analyze mine

A high growth tilted portfolio with strong US focus and moderate diversification beyond large cap leaders

Report created on Dec 17, 2025

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification
Curious how your own portfolio scores? Same analysis, your holdings. First report free — no card needed. Analyze mine

Positions

The portfolio is heavily tilted toward growth-focused US stock ETFs and a few concentrated single-stock positions, with 100% in equities and no bonds or cash. Compared to a broad market benchmark that usually mixes stocks and bonds, this setup is clearly more aggressive and more sensitive to stock market swings. This is aligned with a growth profile but can feel uncomfortable in deep downturns. Keeping this structure makes sense for a long horizon and strong risk tolerance. If stability or capital protection becomes a higher priority, gradually adding some defensive assets or cash-like holdings can smooth the ride without completely abandoning the growth orientation.

Growth Info

Historically, the portfolio has delivered a very high compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 33.85%. CAGR is like the average “speed” of growth per year over time. For comparison, broad stock market benchmarks have typically returned much less, often in the single to low double digits. The max drawdown of around -24% shows that while returns have been strong, the drops have been meaningful but not extreme for a growth-heavy mix. Only 27 days made up 90% of the returns, which highlights how a few big days drive results. It’s important to remember that past performance, especially such high numbers, is unlikely to persist forever.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs 1,000 simulated futures using patterns from historical data, shows extremely wide possible outcomes. Monte Carlo is basically a “what if” engine, replaying many market paths to estimate where the portfolio could end up. Median outcomes above 25,000% and an average simulated annual return near 60% are almost certainly overstated versus realistic expectations, likely driven by unusually strong recent history. These numbers are still useful as a reminder of both upside potential and major uncertainty, but they should not be treated as a forecast. Using these projections more as a rough risk-awareness tool rather than a promise of similar future gains is usually healthier.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All assets in this portfolio are stocks, with 0% in bonds, cash, or alternatives. Benchmarks for balanced or moderate portfolios often include a mix of bonds and sometimes other diversifiers, which can reduce volatility and cushion drawdowns. Being 100% in equities maximizes long-term growth potential but also maximizes exposure to market downturns and sequence-of-returns risk (bad years early in your journey). This setup is quite common for aggressive, long-horizon investors. If shorter-term needs or stability become more important, introducing a small slice of lower-volatility assets can reduce the portfolio’s swings while still keeping a clear growth tilt overall.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    30%
  • Financials
    23%
  • Industrials
    13%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    7%
  • Health Care
    5%
  • Consumer Staples
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Energy
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector exposure is led by technology at 30%, then financial services at 23%, with good representation across industrials, communication services, and several others. This spread across 10+ sectors is a positive sign and broadly in line with how diversified equity benchmarks look, although the tech tilt and growth style can increase sensitivity to interest rates and sentiment around innovation. This allocation is well-balanced and aligns closely with global standards, which is a strength. Still, growth- and momentum-heavy sector tilts can be more volatile during rate hikes or when investor enthusiasm fades. Keeping an eye on whether any single theme starts dominating too much of the portfolio can help avoid unintended concentration.

Regions Info

  • North America
    77%
  • Europe Developed
    11%
  • Japan
    5%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Around 77% of the portfolio sits in North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, and small allocations to other regions. This is similar to many common benchmarks that are US-heavy, and it has been rewarded in recent years as US markets outperformed many others. The international slice adds helpful diversification since different regions can lead or lag at different times. Your portfolio's geographic composition matches typical benchmark data, which is a strong indicator of sensible diversification. If desired, slightly raising non-US exposure could further reduce reliance on one economic region, but the current split is reasonable for someone comfortable with a US anchor.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    54%
  • Large-cap
    31%
  • Mid-cap
    12%
  • Small-cap
    2%

The portfolio leans strongly toward mega and large companies, with 85% in mega and big caps, 12% in mid caps, and minimal small-cap exposure. Large and mega caps tend to be more stable, better researched, and often less volatile than smaller companies, which can be a plus for risk control. However, smaller companies sometimes offer higher growth potential and behave differently across market cycles. This large-cap tilt aligns with many broad benchmarks and supports reliability of pricing and liquidity. For someone wanting a bit more diversification across company sizes, selectively increasing mid or small-cap exposure could add another growth lever, while still keeping the core anchored in big, established names.

Redundant positions Info

  • American Century ETF Trust
    Schwab International Equity ETF
    High correlation

There is a noted high correlation between the American Century ETF and the Schwab International Equity ETF, meaning they’ve tended to move in similar ways historically. Correlation is a measure of how often assets move together; high correlation reduces diversification benefits because both sides fall (or rise) at the same time. When two positions are very similar in behavior, they may not add much risk reduction even if they look different on paper. Reducing overlapping, highly correlated holdings can simplify the portfolio and make each position “earn its place.” Focusing on funds or holdings that behave differently in various market environments can strengthen true diversification.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

From a risk–return angle, this portfolio appears positioned above average on the Efficient Frontier given its strong historical returns. The Efficient Frontier is a curve showing the best possible trade-off between risk and return using available assets. Importantly, “efficient” here means maximizing return for each unit of risk, not necessarily maximizing diversification, income, or simplicity. There is room to refine efficiency by tackling overlapping holdings and revisiting the mix between aggressive growth exposures and more stable components. Any optimization would work only with the existing lineup, just shifting weights rather than adding new types of assets, and should be guided by how much volatility feels acceptable in real-world dollar terms.

Dividends Info

  • American Century ETF Trust 2.70%
  • American Express Company 0.80%
  • Schwab International Equity ETF 3.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.13%

The portfolio’s overall dividend yield of about 1.13% is relatively low, which fits its growth and momentum flavor. Higher-yield positions like the international ETF and American Century fund provide some income, but most of the return here is expected from price appreciation rather than cash payouts. Dividends can act like a small, steady “paycheck” that softens downturns, but they aren’t the main driver in aggressive growth setups. This income profile works well for investors focused on long-term wealth building rather than near-term cash flow. If future goals shift toward income—like funding living expenses—gradually increasing exposure to higher-yielding holdings could help bridge that gap.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • American Century ETF Trust 0.31%
  • Schwab International Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.13%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.10%

The total expense ratio (TER) of around 0.10% is impressively low for an equity-heavy portfolio, especially one with several specialized ETFs. TER is the annual fee charged by funds, and even small differences compound meaningfully over long periods. Compared to many actively managed products, this cost level is very competitive and supports better long-term performance by leaving more of the returns in your pocket. The costs are impressively low, supporting better long-term performance. Continuing to favor cost-efficient vehicles when adjusting or adding positions will help preserve this advantage, while still allowing room for selective higher-cost options only when they bring clear additional benefits.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

Compare your holdings

How much do the funds you hold actually overlap with the ones people weigh them against?

AVUV vs SPMO IDMO vs SPMO DRAM vs SPMO FTEC vs SPMO

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey