Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

A growth focused momentum tilted portfolio with strong equity bias and meaningful gold exposure

Report created on Dec 16, 2025

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is almost entirely in equities with a clear tilt toward momentum and growth styles, plus two “efficient gold plus” funds layered in. Compared with a broad global stock benchmark that usually mixes stocks and bonds, this setup is more aggressive and more style‑concentrated. That matters because momentum and growth can outperform for stretches but also swing harder when markets reverse. The added gold exposure softens some shocks but doesn’t fully offset equity risk. To keep this mix working over time, it helps to set a clear target split between core broad equity funds, style tilts, and gold sleeves, then revisit weights periodically rather than letting recent winners dominate.

Growth Info

Historically this mix has been very strong: a 22.29% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), meaning 10k hypothetically could have grown to about 74k over ten years if that rate persisted. That easily beats typical broad equity benchmarks over similar periods. The max drawdown of –26.49% shows it can still fall sharply, though less than some pure high‑octane growth portfolios. Also, 90% of returns coming from just 24 days highlights how missing a handful of big up days can severely hurt results. Because past performance doesn’t guarantee future outcomes, it’s worth stress‑testing expectations and making sure contribution plans and cash needs don’t rely on repeating these unusually strong historical returns.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, using 1,000 simulations based on historical patterns, points to a wide range of possible futures. Monte Carlo basically throws thousands of “what if” market paths at the portfolio, using past return and volatility behavior as a guide. Here, even the 5th percentile finishing around 297% suggests historically high upside skew, while the median near 1,927% and 67th percentile above 3,000% are eye‑popping. The average simulated annualized return of 27.30% is likely overstated by a very strong backtest period. Since these simulations lean heavily on the past, a more grounded plan would treat the optimistic projections as “best case” and instead build goals and savings assumptions using more conservative long‑term equity‑like return estimates.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Other
    1%

Asset‑class exposure is extremely equity‑heavy at 99% with just 1% in “other” (mostly tied to the gold strategies) and effectively no cash or bonds. Compared with a typical growth benchmark that might hold 70–90% in stocks and the rest in bonds, this leans further out on the risk spectrum. Pure equity portfolios can compound very well over long horizons, but they can also see deep, multi‑year drawdowns without the stabilizing effect of bonds or cash. The high equity stake fits an aggressive growth profile, but it helps to define how much short‑term loss would feel acceptable and whether adding even a modest stabilizing sleeve would better match real‑world liquidity needs like emergency funds or near‑term big purchases.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    24%
  • Financials
    20%
  • Basic Materials
    13%
  • Industrials
    10%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    7%
  • Health Care
    6%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Energy
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector exposure is nicely spread across technology, financials, basic materials, industrials, communication services, consumer areas, healthcare, and smaller stakes in utilities and energy. This broad coverage aligns well with diversified equity standards and avoids an extreme single‑sector bet, even though tech at 24% and financials at 20% are the biggest slices. Momentum and growth tilts often pull more toward tech and communication services, which can be more volatile when interest rates move or sentiment shifts. On the positive side, this composition broadly matches many global benchmarks, a strong sign of diversification. Keeping an eye on whether any single sector drifts past, say, a comfortable threshold helps maintain balance without needing constant tinkering.

Regions Info

  • North America
    67%
  • Europe Developed
    19%
  • Japan
    5%
  • Australasia
    3%
  • Africa/Middle East
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    2%
  • Asia Emerging
    1%

Geographically, about 67% sits in North America with 19% in developed Europe and smaller allocations to Japan, Australasia, and other regions. This roughly lines up with many global market‑cap benchmarks that are naturally U.S.‑heavy, so the global reach is solid and well‑aligned with common practice. The tilt toward developed markets keeps risk lower than an emerging‑market‑dominated approach but slightly limits exposure to faster‑growing economies. For a growth‑oriented profile, this setup is quite reasonable. If a broader global footprint is a goal, incremental shifts toward under‑represented regions can be considered over time without disrupting the overall structure or taking on outsized country‑specific risk.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    48%
  • Large-cap
    36%
  • Mid-cap
    14%
  • Small-cap
    1%

Market‑cap exposure is dominated by mega and big companies (48% and 36%), with 14% in mid‑caps and minimal small‑cap presence. This is very similar to standard large‑cap benchmarks and supports stability and liquidity: big companies often have more diversified businesses and trade more smoothly. The trade‑off is that smaller companies, while riskier, sometimes deliver higher long‑term growth. This large‑cap orientation meshes with the growth and momentum style, giving exposure to market leaders that often drive index returns. If a stronger small‑ and mid‑cap growth engine is desired, a modest, clearly defined allocation to smaller names could be considered, while ensuring the overall risk level doesn’t creep beyond the intended comfort zone.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

From a risk‑return optimization angle, this portfolio already sits in a high‑return, high‑risk corner that can be assessed using the Efficient Frontier. The Efficient Frontier is a curve showing the best possible risk‑return combinations for a given set of assets by varying only their weights. Here, optimization would mean exploring whether a slightly different mix of the same ETFs could deliver similar or better expected return with lower expected volatility, not changing the investment universe. Efficiency doesn’t always equal maximum diversification or lowest risk; instead, it seeks the best trade‑off for the chosen risk level. Running such an optimization periodically can highlight small allocation tweaks that might tighten the risk‑return profile while respecting the growth objective.

Dividends Info

  • WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund 4.30%
  • WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund 2.60%
  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 1.60%
  • Schwab International Equity ETF 3.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 2.01%

The portfolio’s overall dividend yield of about 2.01% is moderate, with some funds providing over 3–4% and others offering very low yields in exchange for pure growth exposure. Dividends are the cash payments companies make to shareholders, and they can be a meaningful part of long‑term total return, especially when reinvested. For a growth profile, this blended yield is quite healthy: it offers some income while keeping strong exposure to companies that reinvest profits for expansion. This balance is encouraging and aligned with many diversified equity strategies. If future income needs will increase, it’s useful to plan whether the current yield plus expected growth will be enough or if a gradual shift toward higher‑yielding holdings later on might help.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund 0.20%
  • WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund 0.45%
  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 0.25%
  • Schwab International Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.13%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.17%

The average total expense ratio (TER) of about 0.17% is impressively low, especially given the use of specialized momentum and efficient gold strategies that often charge more. TER is like a small annual “rent” paid to the fund manager; the less you pay, the more of the return you keep. This cost profile strongly supports long‑term performance and compares very favorably with many actively managed products. Keeping costs this low is a big structural advantage that compounds quietly over decades. To preserve that edge, it’s worth periodically checking whether any replacement or added funds maintain similarly low fees and avoiding frequent trading that might introduce extra transaction costs or taxes.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey