A low cost equity focused portfolio balancing broad market exposure with growth and value tilts
Report created on Oct 19, 2024Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
3/5
Positions
-
VT Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
VTI - US9229087690 50.00% -
SC Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
SCHG - US8085243009 20.00% -
VT Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares
VTV - US9229087443 20.00% -
VX Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
VXUS - US9219097683 10.00%
This portfolio is almost entirely made up of stock ETFs, with half in a broad total market fund and the rest split between growth, value, and a small international slice. For a “balanced” risk label, it’s actually closer to an all‑equity growth setup than a mix of stocks and bonds. That matters because stocks alone can swing more sharply during downturns, even if they pay off well over long periods. Someone wanting smoother returns could consider gradually adding a small slice of lower‑volatility assets. If the goal is long‑term growth and volatility is acceptable, keeping the core structure but simplifying overlapping pieces may work better.
Growth
Historically this mix has been very strong: a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) near 15% means $10,000 could have grown to roughly $40,000 over 10 years if that rate held. CAGR is just the “average yearly speed” of growth over time. The downside is clear too: a max drawdown around ‑35% means a $100,000 balance could have dropped toward $65,000 in a bad stretch. That’s typical for equity‑heavy portfolios and not a red flag by itself. It’s important to remember that past performance only shows how this mix behaved before and cannot guarantee similar results in future markets.
Projection
The Monte Carlo analysis uses many random “what if” paths based on historical patterns to estimate future possibilities. With 1,000 simulations, the median outcome around +500% implies $10,000 hypothetically ending near $60,000 over the tested horizon, while the 5th percentile at 78% suggests much weaker but still positive growth. A key point: Monte Carlo doesn’t predict the future; it reshuffles past‑like returns to show a range of outcomes. It’s helpful for seeing risk and variability, not for nailing a specific number. Treat the optimistic paths as upside potential and the weaker ones as stress‑tests when deciding how much risk feels acceptable.
Asset classes
- Stocks 99%
- Cash 1%
The allocation is 99% stocks and 1% cash, with no meaningful exposure to bonds or other stabilizing assets. Asset classes are broad buckets like stocks, bonds, and cash that behave differently in various market environments. Holding only one main bucket means the ride will track equity markets closely, with big gains in up years and deeper dips in bear markets. For someone comfortable with that pattern, the clear growth focus is a strength. If smoother returns or shorter‑term goals matter, gradually adding a modest share of lower‑volatility assets could make the overall experience more comfortable without abandoning long‑term growth.
Sectors
- Technology 30%
- Financials 15%
- Health Care 10%
- Consumer Discretionary 10%
- Industrials 9%
- Telecommunications 9%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Energy 3%
- Utilities 3%
- Basic Materials 2%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector exposure is well spread across 11 areas, with technology the largest at about 30%, followed by financials, healthcare, consumer, and industrials. This looks similar to many broad equity benchmarks, which is a good sign for diversification. A tech tilt can boost returns when innovation and growth stocks lead, but it may feel bumpier when interest rates rise or when investors rotate into more defensive areas. Because the core total market fund already holds all sectors, the extra growth ETF likely adds more tech and related names. It can help to decide whether that tech‑leaning tilt is intentional and still matches current comfort with volatility.
Regions
- North America 91%
- Europe Developed 4%
- Asia Emerging 2%
- Japan 2%
- Asia Developed 1%
Geographically, around 91% is in North America, with only about 9% spread across Europe and Asia. That’s more home‑biased than many global benchmarks, which often hold closer to 55–65% in U.S. markets. Heavy domestic exposure has worked well in the last decade because U.S. equities outperformed many other regions, so this alignment has been rewarding. The flip side is higher vulnerability if the U.S. market lags or faces a long slump. Increasing the share of broad international exposure over time could reduce reliance on a single region, but sticking with a U.S. tilt can still be reasonable if that’s a conscious preference.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 40%
- Large-cap 34%
- Mid-cap 20%
- Small-cap 4%
- Micro-cap 1%
The market‑cap mix is dominated by mega and big companies (about 74%), with a smaller slice in mid and a thin layer of small and micro caps. Market capitalization just means company size by stock market value. Large firms tend to be more stable and less volatile than very small ones, but they can grow slower from here. This blend is close to common index benchmarks, which is a plus for diversification and simplicity. For someone wanting a bit more growth potential and risk, slightly more small and mid exposure could be interesting; for steadier behavior, the current large‑cap tilt is already a solid, benchmark‑like setup.
Redundant positions
-
High correlationSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
The total U.S. market ETF and the large‑cap growth ETF move very closely together, meaning they’re highly correlated. Correlation measures how often two investments move in the same direction; when it’s high, they behave similarly, so you don’t get much extra diversification from holding both. Here, the growth ETF likely doubles up on many of the biggest names already inside the total market fund. That can amplify exposure to those leaders, which has helped returns recently, but doesn’t really soften downturns. Simplifying overlapping pieces and deciding how much extra growth tilt is truly desired could keep the portfolio cleaner while keeping its overall character.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On a risk‑return chart called the Efficient Frontier, this portfolio likely sits as a high‑return but high‑volatility point because it’s almost all stocks. The Efficient Frontier is just the set of allocations that give the best possible trade‑off between risk and return using a given set of ingredients. Within the current ETFs, shifting weight between broad market, growth, value, and international exposure could find a spot that offers similar expected return with slightly less bumpiness. “Efficient” here only means better risk‑return ratio, not necessarily meeting every personal goal. Before tweaking weights, cleaning up overlapping holdings can make any optimization more meaningful and easier to maintain.
Dividends
- Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
- Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares 2.00%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.30%
The overall dividend yield around 1.3% is modest, which is typical for a growth‑oriented, U.S. heavy equity mix. Dividend yield is the yearly cash payout as a percentage of the investment value, like rental income from a property. The higher yields from the value and international funds help offset the lower income from the growth sleeve. This setup is more about capital appreciation than big cash distributions, which fits long horizons and reinvestment. For anyone relying on the portfolio for near‑term income, this level might feel light, and they might consider gradually tilting a bit more toward higher‑yielding holdings while keeping an eye on total return, not just payouts.
Ongoing product costs
- Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
- Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares 0.04%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%
Costs are impressively low, with a total expense ratio around 0.04%. The Total Expense Ratio (TER) is like a small annual service fee charged by the funds, and keeping it low directly boosts what stays in your pocket over decades. Compared to many actively managed alternatives, this fee level is excellent and strongly supports better long‑term performance. Here, costs are clearly a strength and align with best practices for index investing. The main area to watch isn’t fees but complexity and overlap: if two funds do nearly the same job, consolidating can keep the structure simple without sacrificing this already excellent cost advantage.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
Compare your holdings
How much do the funds you hold actually overlap with the ones people weigh them against?
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey