This portfolio has only about 1.9 years of historical data, based on the youngest asset in the portfolio. Some metrics, projections, and AI insights may be less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.
Get this analysis for your own portfolio Paste your holdings — the first report is free and takes about a minute. Analyze mine

A highly concentrated US heavy equity portfolio with low costs and strong historic growth characteristics

Report created on Dec 17, 2025

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification
Curious how your own portfolio scores? Same analysis, your holdings. First report free — no card needed. Analyze mine

Positions

This portfolio is built almost entirely from broad stock index funds and a few single company positions, with over 80% in large US index exposure and only tiny slices in international funds and individual names. This structure is simple and makes performance closely track the overall stock market, which many investors use as a benchmark for long‑term growth. However, there is a lot of overlap between the big index holdings, meaning several funds are owning the same underlying companies. Streamlining the number of overlapping funds and clarifying the role of each holding could make the portfolio easier to manage while keeping its core stock‑market exposure intact.

Growth Info

Using a simple example, if 10,000 dollars had been invested in this mix over the backtested period, a 22.07% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) implies that amount would have multiplied many times over, far outpacing typical balanced benchmarks. CAGR is like the average yearly “speed” of growth on a long trip, smoothing out bumps along the way. The maximum drawdown of about -19% suggests past declines were meaningful but not extreme for an all‑equity style approach. It’s worth noting that such strong historical returns may reflect a particularly favorable period for stocks and cannot be assumed to repeat in the same way.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs 1,000 simulated futures based on historical patterns, shows a very wide range of possible outcomes, from roughly quadrupling the portfolio at the low end to extremely high growth at the upper percentiles. Monte Carlo is basically a “what if” machine: it shuffles past returns in many random paths to estimate how big or small the portfolio might become. These simulations suggest a high upside but also large uncertainty, which is normal for an equity‑heavy setup. Because the method leans on historical data, it may underestimate new risks or regime changes, so it’s helpful as a guide, not a promise.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Other
    1%

Almost 99% of this portfolio is in stocks, with only a sliver in “other” assets and essentially no cash. That makes it strongly tilted toward growth rather than stability, as stocks tend to rise more over long periods but can swing sharply in the short term. Compared to a typical “balanced” benchmark that mixes stocks and bonds, this structure is much more aggressive. For someone wanting smoother rides, gradually adding a stabilizing asset class, such as high‑quality income‑oriented holdings or cash reserves, could help. For someone comfortable with volatility and focused squarely on long‑term growth, maintaining a high equity share but defining an emergency cash buffer outside the portfolio might be more practical.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    30%
  • Financials
    19%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    9%
  • Health Care
    9%
  • Industrials
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    1%

Sector exposure is broad but tilted: technology and related industries are the largest slice, followed by financials and then a spread across communication services, consumer areas, healthcare, and industrials. This mirrors many broad market benchmarks, where tech and financials naturally dominate, and it’s a positive sign for diversification that most major sectors appear. At the same time, a tech‑heavy market can be more sensitive to interest rate moves and shifting investor sentiment. Periodically checking whether any one theme, like tech‑driven growth or financials, has grown far beyond its intended weight can help keep risk in check without abandoning the overall low‑maintenance index approach.

Regions Info

  • North America
    94%
  • Europe Developed
    2%
  • Asia Emerging
    1%
  • Japan
    1%
  • Asia Developed
    1%

Geographically, the portfolio is overwhelmingly US‑centric, with around 94% in North America and only small allocations to Europe and Asia. This aligns closely with a home‑country bias many US investors have, and it has worked well during recent decades when US markets outperformed. However, such concentration also ties fortunes heavily to one economy, one currency, and one policy environment. Global benchmarks typically include more substantial non‑US exposure, which can reduce reliance on a single region. Gradually building up international holdings over time, even in modest increments, could add resilience if the US experiences a weaker period while other regions perform better.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    46%
  • Large-cap
    32%
  • Mid-cap
    16%
  • Small-cap
    3%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

The market capitalization mix leans strongly toward mega and large companies, with some medium and only small slivers in small and micro caps. Market cap is just a way of saying “company size” on the stock market; big firms often bring stability, while smaller ones can be more volatile but offer different growth patterns. This spread is broadly in line with total‑market benchmarks and is a strength for diversification within the equity slice. If extra growth potential is a goal, slightly increasing diversified exposure to smaller companies could be considered. If smoother behavior is preferred, keeping the current large‑cap tilt or even nudging it higher might better match that comfort level.

Redundant positions Info

  • VANGUARD 500 INDEX FUND ADMIRAL SHARES
    VANGUARD TOTAL WORLD STOCK INDEX FUND INSTITUTIONAL SHARES
    Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    SCHWAB TOTAL STOCK MARKET INDEX FUND SELECT SHARES
    High correlation

The core index holdings in this portfolio are highly correlated, meaning they tend to move up and down together because they own many of the same underlying stocks. Correlation describes how similarly assets behave; when everything moves in sync, the benefit of holding multiple funds is smaller. Here, funds tracking broad US and global indices overlap substantially, so holding several versions of the same exposure adds complexity but not much diversification. Simplifying by choosing fewer primary core funds that provide the desired market coverage, while keeping any truly distinct satellites, can keep the portfolio easier to monitor without meaningfully changing its overall market behavior.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

From a risk‑return optimization angle, this portfolio sits close to the “efficient frontier” for a pure‑equity, low‑cost approach, where efficiency simply means getting the most expected return for each unit of volatility. Because most holdings track similar indexes, shifting weights among them won’t drastically change its overall behavior. However, trimming highly overlapping funds and clarifying the role of each satellite position could slightly reduce risk without sacrificing expected return. Introducing a modest slice of stabilizing assets, if desired, could move the portfolio toward a more efficient point for a balanced profile, though that may trade some potential upside for smoother performance.

Dividends Info

  • Bank of America Corp 1.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF 1.10%
  • AT&T Inc 4.60%
  • VANGUARD 500 INDEX FUND ADMIRAL SHARES 1.10%
  • VANGUARD TOTAL WORLD STOCK INDEX FUND INSTITUTIONAL SHARES 1.20%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Wells Fargo & Company 1.80%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.02%

The overall dividend yield of about 1.02% shows this setup leans more toward price growth than income. Yield is the cash paid out annually as a percentage of the portfolio’s value, and here it’s modest, similar to broad equity benchmarks. Some individual positions, like AT&T and certain financials, offer higher payouts, but they are small pieces of the whole. For long‑term growth investors who reinvest dividends, this is perfectly reasonable and can compound nicely over time. If a future goal involves living off portfolio income, shifting a portion toward higher‑yielding but still diversified holdings later on might support more predictable cash flows.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • iShares Bitcoin Trust 0.12%
  • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF 0.03%
  • SCHWAB SMALL-CAP INDEX FUND SELECT SHARES 0.04%
  • SCHWAB TOTAL STOCK MARKET INDEX FUND SELECT SHARES 0.03%
  • VANGUARD 500 INDEX FUND ADMIRAL SHARES 0.04%
  • VANGUARD TOTAL WORLD STOCK INDEX FUND INSTITUTIONAL SHARES 0.07%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%

The total expense ratio around 0.04% is impressively low and a major strength of this portfolio. Costs like TER (Total Expense Ratio) act like a small leak in a bucket; even tiny fees can add up over decades. Here, the use of low‑cost index funds and ETFs keeps that leak exceptionally small, which supports better long‑term performance compared with higher‑fee strategies. Since the main holdings are already very fee‑efficient, there is no pressing need to chase further tiny fee reductions. The bigger opportunity lies in simplifying overlapping positions while preserving low‑cost exposure, ensuring ongoing contributions continue to benefit from this cost advantage.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

Compare your holdings

How much do the funds you hold actually overlap with the ones people weigh them against?

SPMO vs VXUS SCHG vs VXUS SCHY vs VXUS AVUV vs VXUS

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey