Value-tilted global tracker that secretly just loves giant tech and hopes for the best
Report created on Aug 18, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
SP SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
SPYY - IE00B44Z5B48 60.00% -
IS iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
IS3S - IE00BD45HH35 30.00% -
5M iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) USD
5MVL - IE00BG0SKF03 10.00%
Structurally this is a Russian doll of global equity: one big all-world ETF with two value-factor wrappers bolted on. On paper it screams “smart beta sophistication,” but in practice it’s a slightly overengineered way to own the same global stock market with a mild value accent. The mix is clean and simple, yet weirdly redundant: 60% owns everything, 40% tries to be clever around the edges. It’s like ordering a plain pizza and then asking for “extra plain” on top. The result is globally broad, but not particularly original, and the so‑called balance is just 100% stocks with a nice label slapped on.
Growth
Historically this portfolio actually held its own, just not heroically. A €1,000 stake growing to €2,763 is a very solid ride, with a 14.07% CAGR quietly flexing in the background. That’s beating the global market by a hair, which is decent, but lagging the US by over 2% a year — the penalty for not being fully in love with American megacap glory. Max drawdown at around -33% shows this “balanced” setup falls just as hard as the benchmarks when things hit the fan. Past performance is like a highlight reel: fun to watch, but it doesn’t guarantee the sequel ends the same way.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection politely reminds that markets do whatever they want. A simulation is basically running a thousand alternate universes where returns bounce around based on history and volatility, then seeing where the money lands. Median outcome of about €2,864 after 15 years is basically “meh but okay,” and the p5–p95 range from roughly €976 to €7,743 says anything from break-even to a small fortune is on the table. That 73.8% chance of a positive result is nice, but not magical. It’s yesterday’s weather forecast stretched into the future: directionally helpful, absolutely not a promise.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Asset class “diversification” here is just 100% stocks dressed up with a balanced risk score, which is cute. No bonds, no real cash anchor, no alternative anything — just pure equity roller coaster. Calling this balanced is like calling an espresso martini “hydrating.” When everything is one asset class, all the risk levers point the same way: if equities get punched, the entire portfolio flinches. It’s efficient for long-term growth, but there’s zero built-in cushion. The upside is simplicity; the downside is that volatility is taken straight, no chaser, whether or not that’s what the label suggests.
Sectors
- Technology 33%
- Financials 17%
- Industrials 10%
- Consumer Discretionary 9%
- Health Care 8%
- Telecommunications 7%
- Consumer Staples 4%
- Energy 4%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector-wise, this portfolio talks a big value game but is still clearly obsessed with tech — 33% is a full-blown dependency. Then you’ve got decent chunks in financials and industrials, but the leadership is very much “chips, code, and cloud.” Health care, staples, and utilities sit in the corner like chaperones at a teenage party: technically present, not running the show. The sector mix has strong “growth in denial” vibes: a value label masking a tech-heavy reality. If tech stumbles as a group, the whole portfolio catches a cold fast, while the “boring” sectors are too small to do much stabilizing.
Regions
- North America 55%
- Europe Developed 16%
- Asia Developed 9%
- Japan 9%
- Asia Emerging 6%
- Latin America 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Australasia 1%
Geographically, this is basically a polite nod to global investing with a strong “North America first” instinct. Over half in North America means the portfolio is still heavily tied to one big economic story, even if the slide deck says “worldwide.” Europe, Japan, and the rest of Asia get a respectable but clearly supporting role, and Latin America plus Africa are rounding-error decorations. It’s not embarrassingly home-biased for a European investor, but it’s also not truly worldly. This is more “US-led world tour” than genuinely even-handed global allocation, with fortunes highly linked to how one big region behaves.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 45%
- Large-cap 36%
- Mid-cap 17%
The market-cap mix is exactly what you’d expect from hugging global indexes: 45% mega-cap, 36% large-cap, and a small mid-cap side quest. This is a portfolio that clearly trusts giant corporations to run the show while mid-caps get the occasional guest appearance. Small caps are basically missing in action, so any “size premium” dreams are mostly marketing, not reality. The result is a very top-heavy structure where a relatively small group of massive companies quietly dictates a lot of the performance and risk. It’s tidy and liquid, but hardly adventurous — more blue-chip fan club than full market democracy.
True holdings
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 4.32%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
- iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 2.88%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
AA Apple Inc. 2.57%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 2.37%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
- iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) USD
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 2.04%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.51%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.16%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.08%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
CS Cisco Systems Inc 0.97%
Part of fund(s):- iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
-
00 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 0.91%
Part of fund(s):- iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) USD
- Top 10 total 19.81%
The look-through holdings scream one thing: this portfolio is deeply in love with big tech and chip names while pretending to be refined and factor-based. Micron, NVIDIA, Apple, TSMC, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Broadcom, Cisco, Samsung — it’s the usual mega-tech-plus-semiconductor parade. Because only top-10 ETF holdings are captured, the actual overlap is almost certainly worse than it looks. This is hidden concentration 101: different wrappers, same stars. So while the surface looks diversified across thousands of holdings, a handful of giant companies are effectively running the show from behind the ETF curtain.
Risk contribution
-
SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
Weight: 60.00% 59.5% -
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
Weight: 30.00% 30.4% -
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) USD
Weight: 10.00% 10.1%
Risk contribution here is almost comically proportional. The big ACWI fund is 60% of the weight and roughly 60% of total risk, the two factor funds track their weights almost exactly. No secret villain, no tiny position doing all the chaos work — just three big blocks each pulling their fair share of drama. It’s efficient but boring: if the portfolio wobbles, all three legs of the stool are wobbling together. This setup is great for tidiness, less great if the goal was to have distinct risk engines instead of one big equity machine painted three slightly different shades.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk–return chart, this portfolio actually behaves itself: it sits on or very near the efficient frontier. The efficient frontier is the curve showing the best possible return for each risk level using the same ingredients but different weights. Sharpe ratio of 0.67 isn’t thrilling next to 0.87 for the optimal combo, but the optimizer only squeezes out a bit more juice with almost the same risk. Translation: the allocation isn’t wasting much potential given its holdings. It’s not a work of genius, but there’s nothing clownish here either — just a sensible mix that doesn’t embarrass itself.
Ongoing product costs
- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF 0.12%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.07%
Costs are the one thing this portfolio absolutely nails. A total TER of 0.07% is almost suspiciously low, like the platforms forgot to charge properly. This is essentially institutional-level pricing in retail clothing. Fees are the one area where nothing needs roasting: you’re basically getting global equity exposure and factor seasoning for the cost of a loose coin under the sofa each year. The only mild jab is that such an aggressively cheap setup is being used to run a fairly plain-vanilla strategy — it’s like renting a professional kitchen to make toast.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey