Quietly hyperactive global stock cocktail dressed up as a chilled balanced portfolio
Report created on Aug 11, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
AV Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
AVWC - IE000RJECXS5 60.00% -
AV Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc
AVWS 25.00% -
AV Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
AVEM - IE000K975W13 15.00%
This “balanced” portfolio is 100% in three equity funds, so the word “balanced” is mostly there for decoration. It’s essentially one big global core fund with a turbo shot of small-cap value and a side order of emerging markets. Structurally, it’s tidy but extremely single-minded: if global stocks sneeze, the entire thing catches a cold. With only three positions, there’s no hiding place and no nuance; it’s like ordering the tasting menu and discovering it’s just the same dish in three slightly different sizes. The simplicity is clean, but the risk story is brutally binary: world equities up, you’re happy; world equities down, everything sulks together.
Growth
On 1.6 years of history, this thing has absolutely flown: €1,000 turning into €1,351 and a 20.42% CAGR looks heroic next to both the US and global markets. But that track record is basically a highlight reel from a short, friendly part of the cycle. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is just the “average speed” of your money, and here it’s measured over what amounts to a single sprint, not a marathon. The -20.5% max drawdown shows it can still punch you in the face when markets wobble. Past data this short is like judging a football team after 15 minutes — entertaining, but not exactly conclusive.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection takes that short, spicy history and spins 1,000 imaginary 15‑year futures out of it. Median outcome of €2,791 from €1,000 sounds great, but the p5–p95 range from roughly break-even (€988) to €7,828 is basically saying “could be boring, could be legendary, no one knows.” Monte Carlo is just repeated dice-rolling with historical volatility and returns as inputs; and here those inputs come from all of 1.6 years. So the simulation is more “vibes-based fan fiction” than hard science. Still, the 72.3% chance of a positive outcome simply confirms the obvious: fully equity portfolios usually reward patience, eventually.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Asset allocation here is easy to explain: it’s stocks, and then more stocks, topped with a garnish of stocks. Zero bonds, zero cash buffer, zero alternative anything. For a portfolio tagged as “balanced,” this is basically an equity maximalist in a sensible sweater. Asset classes are the main levers for dialing up or down the nausea during crashes; having only one lever means the ride will be very straightforward and occasionally very unpleasant. When the equity engine stalls, there’s nothing here to keep the portfolio from dropping in sync. This is simple by design, but also uncompromising — there’s no Plan B asset class.
Sectors
- Financials 21%
- Technology 20%
- Industrials 13%
- Consumer Discretionary 13%
- Energy 8%
- Basic Materials 6%
- Health Care 6%
- Telecommunications 6%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Utilities 1%
- Real Estate 1%
Sector-wise, this thing is pretending to be broad but quietly leans toward the usual suspects. Financials and tech together are already 41%, so the portfolio is heavily exposed to the mood swings of banks, software, chips, and anything vaguely digital. With industrials and consumer discretionary also chunky, a lot of the risk rests on global economic growth actually behaving itself. Low single-digit exposure to utilities and real estate means almost no ballast from boring, regulated plodders when markets freak out. It’s not dangerously lopsided, but it’s definitely more “growth-flavored global salad” than a slow and steady snoozefest of defensive sectors.
Regions
- North America 62%
- Europe Developed 13%
- Asia Developed 8%
- Japan 6%
- Asia Emerging 6%
- Africa/Middle East 2%
- Australasia 2%
- Latin America 2%
Geographically, this is a love letter to North America with 62% parked there and everyone else sharing the scraps. Europe, developed Asia, Japan, and emerging regions get cameo roles, but the US clearly owns the stage. For a “global” concept, this is more “world tour with a permanent residency in North America.” The emerging markets slice at 6% equity share via the regional breakdown contrasts with a 15% dedicated EM fund weight, so the small positions are doing more work than they look. When the US does well, all this looks genius; when it doesn’t, the portfolio suddenly remembers that concentration risk is a thing.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 25%
- Mid-cap 23%
- Large-cap 21%
- Small-cap 20%
- Micro-cap 11%
The market cap mix is where things get a bit more interesting and slightly chaotic: mega, large, and mid caps together are 69%, but small caps and micro caps still claim a hefty 31%. That’s a lot of tiny and mid-sized companies thrown into the blender. Small and micro caps are like the rowdy kids at a party — fun when things are going well, but they’re always the first to cause trouble in a downturn. The tilt toward smaller companies makes the portfolio more volatile under the hood than a generic large‑cap-heavy index, even if it hides behind the polite label of “balanced.”
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 2.13%
Part of fund(s):- Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
-
AA Apple Inc. 1.93%
Part of fund(s):- Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.25%
Part of fund(s):- Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 1.12%
Part of fund(s):- Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 1.03%
Part of fund(s):- Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 0.93%
Part of fund(s):- Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 0.74%
Part of fund(s):- Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 0.73%
Part of fund(s):- Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 0.70%
Part of fund(s):- Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
TS Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 0.65%
Part of fund(s):- Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
- Top 10 total 11.21%
The look‑through holdings list reads like the usual global equity fan club: NVIDIA, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, TSMC. In other words, a who’s who of “things that dominate every index whether you like it or not.” These names add up to a modest percentage individually, but remember the data only covers ETF top 10s — the overlap is almost certainly much larger further down the holdings lists. So the portfolio pretends to be diversified across thousands of companies, while a small handful of giant tech and platform businesses quietly drive a big chunk of the outcome from multiple directions at once.
Risk contribution
-
Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
Weight: 60.00% 59.0% -
Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc
Weight: 25.00% 25.8% -
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
Weight: 15.00% 15.2%
Risk contribution here is gloriously simple and slightly dull: each fund’s share of risk is almost exactly its portfolio weight. No sneaky position punching above its weight, no hidden drama, just “you own 60%, it brings ~59% of the risk; 25% weight, ~26% of risk” and so on. Risk contribution is basically a check on which holdings actually move the needle when things swing; here, everything behaves like a proportional adult. That said, with only three positions all in equities, 100% of portfolio risk comes from the exact same place: global stock markets. So the risk analysis is tidy but brutally monotone.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
The efficient frontier politely says: “You’re not a disaster.” The current portfolio sits basically on the frontier, meaning that given these three ingredients, the risk–return trade-off is mathematically efficient. Sharpe ratio 1.1 vs 1.55 for the optimal blend and 1.28 for the minimum variance shows there are more elegant ways to combine the same funds, but the difference isn’t catastrophic. The efficient frontier is just the curve showing the best possible return for each risk level using only what’s already in the portfolio. So the structure is reasonably smart; the main issue is not inefficiency, it’s that all the efficiency is trapped inside one very equity-heavy universe.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey