A globally diversified stock portfolio emphasizing low costs and strong long term growth potential
Report created on Aug 27, 2024Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
VT Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
VTI - US9229087690 50.00% -
VX Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
VXUS - US9219097683 50.00%
This portfolio is split evenly between a broad domestic stock fund and a broad international stock fund, creating a simple two‑fund structure that mirrors global equity markets fairly closely. That kind of “total market plus total international” mix is a classic core approach because it owns thousands of companies across many countries in one shot. Compared with a typical balanced benchmark that mixes stocks and bonds, this is more aggressive because it’s almost entirely in stocks. For someone who wants growth but still likes a straightforward setup, staying with this core structure and only tweaking the split or adding a small defensive sleeve (like cash or similar) can keep things easy to manage.
Growth
Historically, this mix has delivered a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 12.42%, meaning a hypothetical $10,000 would have grown to roughly $32,000 over 10 years if that rate continued. CAGR is just the “average yearly speed” of growth, smoothing out ups and downs. The max drawdown of about -34% shows the worst historical drop from peak to trough, which is significant but in line with stock‑heavy portfolios. Only 30 days made up 90% of returns, showing how a few strong days drive long‑term gains. Past numbers look strong, but they can’t guarantee future results, so using them mainly as a risk and behavior guide works best.
Projection
The Monte Carlo simulation ran 1,000 possible future paths using historical patterns of returns and volatility to see a range of outcomes. Monte Carlo basically “replays” many different what‑if market scenarios to show how an investment might behave, not to predict a single number. Here, 987 out of 1,000 simulations ended positive, with the median scenario around 388.7% of the starting amount and the lower 5th percentile still at 71.5%. The overall simulated annualized return around 13.42% looks optimistic. Still, simulations rely on past data and assumptions, so they can understate extreme events; treat them as a rough planning tool rather than a promise.
Asset classes
- Stocks 99%
- Cash 1%
The portfolio sits at roughly 99% stocks and 1% cash, which is very growth‑oriented even though it’s classified as “balanced.” Compared to typical balanced benchmarks that might hold 40–60% in bonds or other stabilizers, this mix will likely swing more in both directions. The upside is strong return potential and very broad diversification within global equities themselves. The downside is larger temporary losses during bear markets and fewer buffers when stocks fall together. For someone wanting smoother rides, gradually adding a small allocation to defensive assets could lower volatility, while those fully focused on long‑term growth might simply keep a cash reserve outside this portfolio for emergencies.
Sectors
- Technology 25%
- Financials 18%
- Industrials 12%
- Consumer Discretionary 10%
- Health Care 8%
- Telecommunications 8%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Energy 4%
- Utilities 3%
- Real Estate 3%
Sector exposure is spread across 11 areas, with technology at 25% and financial services at 18%, then industrials, consumer cyclicals, and healthcare following behind. This is quite similar to global equity benchmarks today and suggests no single sector dominates excessively. Tech‑heavier allocations tend to benefit when innovation and productivity trends are strong but may get hit harder when interest rates rise or regulations tighten. Having meaningful weight in financials, industrials, and consumer areas adds resilience across different economic conditions. This sector mix is well‑balanced and aligns closely with global standards, so making only small, intentional tilts rather than large sector bets can help keep risk manageable.
Regions
- North America 54%
- Europe Developed 18%
- Asia Emerging 8%
- Japan 8%
- Asia Developed 6%
- Australasia 2%
- Africa/Middle East 2%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, the portfolio holds about 54% in North America, with substantial exposure to developed Europe, Japan, and both developed and emerging Asia, plus smaller stakes in Africa/Middle East and Latin America. That’s broadly similar to global market‑cap weights, giving real diversification across regions and economic cycles. Heavy North American exposure has been helpful over the last decade, but other regions can drive returns in different periods. The presence of emerging markets, even at modest levels, adds growth potential but also more volatility. Overall, this geographic spread matches benchmark data well, which is a strong indicator of diversification and helps reduce dependence on any single country’s fortunes.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 43%
- Large-cap 30%
- Mid-cap 18%
- Small-cap 5%
- Micro-cap 1%
By market capitalization, the portfolio leans 43% mega cap, 30% big, 18% medium, with smaller slices in small and micro companies. This is a classic “market‑cap weighted” pattern, where the largest global companies naturally take up more space. Large and mega caps usually provide more stability and liquidity, while mid and small caps can deliver higher growth but more dramatic ups and downs. This mix spreads exposure across company sizes in a way that mirrors broad benchmarks, which supports diversification within equities. Keeping this natural cap‑weight tilt is a simple way to balance quality and growth potential without needing to pick individual size segments actively.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On a risk‑return chart known as the Efficient Frontier, which shows the best trade‑off between volatility and return for a set of assets, this portfolio already sits in a strong position for a pure‑equity mix. Efficient Frontier just means “for this level of risk, can you reasonably get more return with the same building blocks?” Here, adjustments would mainly involve slightly changing the split between domestic and international stocks or adding a modest stabilizing component. Efficiency refers purely to the risk‑return ratio, not other goals like income or values alignment. Within the current two‑ETF setup, it’s already very close to a clean, efficient global equity allocation.
Dividends
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.90%
The blended dividend yield is around 1.90%, coming from roughly 1.10% on the domestic fund and 2.70% on the international fund. A dividend yield is the cash paid out each year as a percentage of the investment’s price, like interest on a savings account but generally less predictable. This level is moderate and fits a growth‑oriented stock portfolio that relies more on price increases than on income. For long‑term investors who reinvest dividends, these payouts can significantly boost compounding over decades. While this setup may not suit someone needing high current income, it’s well aligned with a focus on total return and wealth building over time.
Ongoing product costs
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%
The total expense ratio (TER) is an impressively low 0.04%, with 0.03% on the domestic ETF and 0.05% on the international ETF. TER is the annual fee taken by the fund manager, and even tiny differences compound massively over decades—like a slow leak in a bucket. Keeping costs this low is a major strength because it lets more of the portfolio’s gross return stay in the investor’s pocket. This cost level is better than most active strategies and even beats many passive options. Sticking with such low‑fee, broadly diversified funds strongly supports better long‑term performance, especially when combined with a simple, consistent investing habit.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
Compare your holdings
How much do the funds you hold actually overlap with the ones people weigh them against?
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey