Highly concentrated semiconductor growth portfolio with exceptional past returns and very high risk profile
Report created on Apr 16, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
Positions
-
SM VanEck Semiconductor ETF
SMH - US92189F6768 40.67% -
NV NVIDIA Corporation
NVDA - US67066G1040 26.92% -
TS Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
TSM - US8740391003 25.81% -
VO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
VOO - US9229083632 5.06% -
US Cash (USD)
USD 1.54%
This portfolio is extremely focused: roughly 98% in stocks and about 2% in cash, with three core holdings plus one broad market ETF. Around two-thirds is in a semiconductor ETF, with very large direct positions in NVIDIA and Taiwan Semiconductor and a small allocation to a broad US market fund. That structure makes this a single-theme, stock-heavy portfolio with minimal ballast. A setup like this can deliver massive upside when the theme is in favor but can also fall sharply when sentiment turns. Anyone using a structure like this typically treats it as a high-conviction “satellite” rather than a complete all-weather portfolio.
Growth
Historically, this portfolio has been a rocket ship: $1,000 grew to about $66,669, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 52.71%. CAGR is like average speed on a long road trip, smoothing out bumps to show steady yearly growth. That massively outpaced both the US market (14.42%) and global market (11.91%). The flip side is a brutal max drawdown of -59.77%, meaning the value was cut by more than half at one point. That level of volatility demands strong emotional discipline; people uncomfortable seeing big swings might struggle to stay invested during rough patches.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection models many possible futures by shuffling and repeating patterns from past returns, then showing a range of potential outcomes. Here, a $1,000 starting amount has a median 15‑year outcome of about $2,672, with a wide “likely” band from roughly $1,784 to $4,036. That’s an annualized expectation around 7.86%, much lower than the past 52% CAGR. This gap highlights a key point: historical performance, especially for hot sectors, is rarely sustainable indefinitely. Simulations can’t predict the future, but they do remind us that huge past gains don’t guarantee similar results going forward, particularly for concentrated, cyclical themes.
Asset classes
- Stocks 98%
- Cash 2%
By asset class, the portfolio is almost entirely in equities, with just a tiny 2% slice in cash and no bonds or other diversifiers. Stocks are growth engines but also the main source of volatility; without bonds or more defensive assets, there’s nothing to soften major drawdowns. Many broad benchmarks blend stocks with other asset types to smooth the ride, but this setup leans fully into equity risk. That can make sense for long horizons and high risk tolerance, especially in a high-growth theme, but it also means market shocks will hit full force with little protection.
Sectors
- Technology 97%
- Financials 1%
- Telecommunications 1%
- Consumer Discretionary 1%
- Health Care 1%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Sector-wise, this portfolio is overwhelmingly tilted: about 97% in technology, with only token exposure to other sectors. So the fortunes of a single industry will drive almost all returns. Tech, and especially semiconductors, tends to be very sensitive to interest rates, global demand cycles, and innovation trends. When conditions are favorable, gains can be spectacular; during slowdowns or policy shifts, declines can be equally dramatic. The positive side is that the sector alignment is very clear and intentional, which is good if the goal is targeted growth rather than broad, benchmark-like diversification across the economy.
Regions
- North America 66%
- Asia Emerging 26%
- Asia Developed 5%
- Europe Developed 3%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Geographically, roughly two‑thirds of exposure is tied to North America, with about a quarter in emerging Asia and small slices in developed Asia and Europe. That mix mirrors where many leading chip companies are based and where the semiconductor supply chain operates. Compared to a typical global benchmark, this is more concentrated in a few key regions rather than spread across many markets. That means results will be heavily influenced by US policy, Asian manufacturing dynamics, and cross‑border trade tensions. When these regions do well together, returns can be strong; when they clash, volatility can spike.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 74%
- Large-cap 21%
- Mid-cap 5%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
The portfolio leans heavily into mega‑cap and large‑cap companies, with about 95% in those size buckets and only a small 5% in mid‑caps. Market capitalization simply measures company size by total stock value; mega‑caps are the giants. This tilt brings exposure to established industry leaders, which often have strong balance sheets and dominant market positions. At the same time, it means less participation in smaller, potentially faster‑growing names that can sometimes outperform over long stretches. As a result, performance is likely to track the fate of big, headline semiconductor names rather than a broad mix of small up‑and‑comers.
True holdings
-
Part of fund(s):
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
Part of fund(s):
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AV Broadcom Inc 3.37%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
IN Intel Corporation 2.20%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
LR Lam Research Corp 2.02%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
KL KLA Corporation 2.01%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AS ASML Holding NV ADR 1.98%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AM Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.97%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AM Applied Materials Inc 1.94%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 1.91%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Top 10 total 82.64%
Looking through the ETF, NVIDIA makes up about 34.8% of total exposure and Taiwan Semiconductor around 30.45%, combining both direct shares and the ETF holdings. That’s hidden concentration: even though there are multiple line items, the actual economic bets are heavily stacked in just two companies. Other chip names like Broadcom, Intel, and ASML appear only via the ETF, each at a few percent or less. Overlap is probably slightly understated because only ETF top-10 holdings are captured. When the same big names show up repeatedly, portfolio behavior becomes dominated by those companies rather than the broader basket.
Factors
Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.
Factor exposure shows strong tilts: very high quality (80%) and high momentum (61%), combined with very low low‑volatility (17%), plus low value, size, and yield. Factors are like underlying “traits” that drive returns, such as stable earnings (quality) or recent strong performance (momentum). A high quality and momentum tilt often does well in strong, trending markets, particularly in growth stories like leading chip makers. The very low low‑volatility tilt means this portfolio is positioned for big moves rather than smoothness. When trends reverse or growth stocks fall out of favor, these same factor tilts can amplify drawdowns.
Risk contribution
-
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Weight: 41.31% 38.3% -
NVIDIA Corporation
Weight: 27.34% 36.9% -
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Weight: 26.21% 22.7% -
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Weight: 5.14% 2.1%
Risk contribution reveals that the top three holdings drive about 97.85% of total portfolio volatility. NVIDIA, with a 27% weight, contributes roughly 36.9% of the overall risk, meaning its ups and downs matter more than its size alone suggests. The semiconductor ETF and Taiwan Semiconductor each add another big chunk. A broad US market ETF sits at around 5% weight but only about 2.1% of risk, acting as a small stabilizer. When a handful of positions dominate risk like this, the portfolio’s behavior will closely track those names; changing their sizes would significantly alter total volatility.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
The efficient frontier analysis shows the current portfolio has a Sharpe ratio of 1.13, with very high annualized return (41.93%) and substantial risk (33.69%). The Sharpe ratio measures return earned per unit of risk, after adjusting for a risk‑free rate; higher is better. The optimal mix of these same holdings could reach a Sharpe of 1.32, while a minimum‑variance version lowers risk but also return. Because the current point sits about 2.65 percentage points below the frontier, a different weighting of the same positions could improve the risk/return tradeoff. The encouraging part is that the underlying building blocks already support strong efficiency.
Dividends
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.20%
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 0.80%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
- Weighted yield (per year) 0.35%
Income isn’t the focus here. The overall yield is around 0.35%, with the semiconductor ETF at about 0.20%, Taiwan Semiconductor near 0.80%, and the broad S&P 500 ETF around 1.10%. Dividend yield is the cash payment investors receive each year as a percentage of share price. For growth‑oriented setups, low yield can be fine because companies are often reinvesting profits rather than paying them out. But for anyone seeking steady income, this kind of portfolio wouldn’t pull much weight. Most of the expected return is from price movement, not regular cash payouts.
Ongoing product costs
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.15%
On costs, the portfolio is actually in a very good place. The semiconductor ETF charges a total expense ratio (TER) of 0.35% and the S&P 500 ETF only 0.03%, leading to a blended TER of about 0.15%. TER is the annual fee percentage you pay to the fund manager. That overall level is impressively low for such a specialized theme, and it supports better long‑term performance because less return is lost to fees each year. From a cost perspective, this setup is aligned with best practices and provides a solid foundation for compounding over time.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey