Quietly overcomplicated global tracker with a secret crush on value and a tech-fueled identity crisis
Report created on May 3, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
SP SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
SPYY - IE00B44Z5B48 70.00% -
IS iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
IS3S - IE00BD45HH35 20.00% -
5M iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) USD
5MVL - IE00BG0SKF03 10.00%
This portfolio is basically a world index with commitment issues. Seventy percent is a plain-vanilla ACWI tracker, then 20% gets slapped into developed value and another 10% into emerging value, like someone tried to “optimize” a perfectly fine sandwich by stuffing extra bread inside. Structurally it’s very top-heavy: three funds, one of them doing almost all the work, the other two acting as tilted sidekicks. The result isn’t wild or eccentric, just mildly redundant. It looks like a core global portfolio that couldn’t resist tinkering at the edges, adding factor layers that complicate the story more than they transform it.
Growth
Performance-wise, this portfolio has strong “almost but not quite” energy. Turning €1,000 into €2,457 since late 2018 is respectable, but the US market strolled past with a 15.41% CAGR while this sat at 12.89%. Even the broad global market basically matched it, edging ahead by 0.02% CAGR, which is the investing equivalent of losing a photo finish. Max drawdown was about -33%, right in line with the benchmarks, so the pain was standard issue. A decent ride overall, but for all the extra value-flavored effort, the payoff versus a boring global tracker has been more shrug than victory lap.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection is where the portfolio gets gently dragged by math. A simulation is basically running thousands of alternate timelines to see how often things go well or badly, using past volatility as a rough guide. Here, median outcome is €2,606 after 15 years from €1,000 — not terrible, not legendary. The “likely” middle band is wide, and the nasty 5% tail dips below your starting value, which says this is still very much an equity rollercoaster. Past data plus simulations is more “yesterday’s weather forecast squinted into the future” than prophecy, but it does show this setup isn’t a guaranteed hero.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Asset class breakdown is about as subtle as a brick: 100% stocks, zero anything else. For a so-called “balanced” risk label scoring 4/7, this is unapologetically full-equity, with no bonds, cash buffer, or diversifiers pretending to soften the blows. It’s like calling an all-chili menu “balanced cuisine” because there are different types of chili. When markets are up, this is great; when they go down, there’s nothing here to cushion the fall. The risk label says “balanced,” the holdings say “equity junkie,” and the portfolio clearly isn’t interested in compromise.
Sectors
- Technology 29%
- Financials 16%
- Industrials 10%
- Consumer Discretionary 9%
- Health Care 8%
- Telecommunications 8%
- Energy 5%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Utilities 3%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector-wise, this thing is trying to be value-conscious but still worships at the altar of tech. Technology at 29% is a big chunk for a portfolio that pretends to like “cheap and boring,” especially with mega names all over the look-through list. Financials and industrials show up respectably, but nothing screams deliberate contrarian positioning; it’s mostly global index by default with a thin value glaze. Real estate and utilities barely exist, so the more defensive, plodding parts of the market are mostly background noise. It’s a portfolio that talks like a value investor but still checks in on the cool tech kids every day.
Regions
- North America 56%
- Europe Developed 16%
- Asia Developed 9%
- Japan 7%
- Asia Emerging 7%
- Latin America 2%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Australasia 1%
Geographically, this is yet another portfolio that thinks the world begins and ends with North America at 56%. Europe, Asia, Japan, and emerging regions are allowed a supporting role, but this is still a US-led show in all but name. For something marketed as “ACWI plus value tilts,” it behaves like a global portfolio that just can’t quit the largest market. To its credit, there is at least real exposure across most regions, so it’s not a one-flag obsession. But the tilt pattern screams “world index with a North America default setting” rather than any brave global conviction.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 44%
- Large-cap 40%
- Mid-cap 15%
Market cap exposure is very status-quo: 44% mega-cap, 40% large-cap, 15% mid-cap, and basically zero appetite for the truly small stuff. This is a portfolio that wants the safety blanket of big brands while pretending to be edgy with “value.” In practice, it’s parked comfortably with the corporate giants, where news coverage is thick and liquidity is endless. The mid-cap slice is just big enough to say it exists, but not enough to meaningfully change behavior. This is standard large-cap world in disguise, not some bold size-tilt experiment. Nothing offensive here, just aggressively conventional.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 3.30%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
AA Apple Inc 2.90%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 2.09%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
- iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) USD
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 2.03%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.55%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.29%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.10%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 1.09%
Part of fund(s):- iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.08%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 0.97%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
- Top 10 total 17.40%
The look-through holdings are a fun reveal: for all the “value factor” branding, the top exposures read like a fan poster of the usual mega-cap darlings — NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, TSMC, Broadcom, Micron. Hidden concentration shows up via repetition across funds, so a few tech and semiconductor names quietly dominate more than the surface weights suggest. With only ETF top-10 data, overlap is likely understated, meaning the true dependence on a tiny group of giants is probably higher. The portfolio claims global diversification, but its most important drivers are the same narrow club everyone else is relying on.
Risk contribution
-
SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
Weight: 70.00% 70.4% -
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
Weight: 20.00% 19.8% -
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) USD
Weight: 10.00% 9.8%
Risk contribution is brutally simple here: the 70% ACWI fund contributes about 70% of total risk, and the other two funds each line up almost perfectly with their weights. No sneaky position is punching way above its size; everything is behaving like a scaled version of the same equity risk. That sounds tidy, but it also means there’s no true diversifier in the mix — all three components are dancing to the same global-equity beat. Risk contribution, basically asking “who’s actually rocking the boat,” answers: “everyone, in proportion to their size, in the same direction.”
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the efficient frontier chart, this portfolio grudgingly earns a gold star. The Sharpe ratio of 0.6 is lower than the 0.8 available from the mathematically “optimal” mix, but the current allocation sits basically on the efficient frontier curve. Translation: with this set of ingredients, the weights aren’t doing anything stupid. Tiny tweaks could squeeze out slightly better risk-adjusted returns, but there’s no glaring inefficiency to roast. It’s like someone randomly filled the cart and still ended up with a fairly well-balanced recipe. Annoying from a critic’s point of view, but credit where it’s due.
Ongoing product costs
- iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) USD 0.40%
- iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR 0.30%
- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF 0.12%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.18%
Costs are one of the few things this portfolio absolutely nails. A total TER of 0.18% for a three-fund global setup with factor tilts is pleasantly low — you must have accidentally picked the right ETFs instead of the flashy expensive ones. The core ACWI at 0.12% does the heavy lifting cheaply, while the value tilts charge a little premium for the factor flavoring. It’s not free, but it’s nowhere near “first-class ticket for an economy seat” territory. Fees aren’t the villain in this story; if anything, they’re the rare supporting character that’s actually doing its job quietly.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey