Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it Roast mode 🔥

Hypercharged tech rocket strapped onto a supposedly balanced world tracker

Report created on Apr 23, 2026

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio calls itself “balanced” but it’s basically All-World with a triple shot of US tech and a semiconductor chaser. Half the money sits in a sensible global tracker, then 40% is spent aggressively doubling and tripling down on the same growthy corner of the market. It’s like ordering a balanced meal and then adding two extra desserts that are just sugar in different shapes. On paper the number of funds looks tidy and simple, but under the hood the exposures are heavily recycled. The structure isn’t chaotic, just very single-minded: “own the world, then bet hard that the US tech rocket keeps flying.”

Growth Info

Historically, the rocket has worked. Turning £1,000 into £2,162 with a 15.55% CAGR absolutely smokes the global market and even edges the US market. CAGR, by the way, is the “average speed” of your money over time, smoothing out the drama. The price for that outperformance was a near -22% max drawdown and a year and a half just to claw back to break-even. For a “balanced” label, that’s a spicy ride. Outperforming doesn’t mean invincible; it just means the last few years happened to favour exactly what this portfolio overdoses on.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection basically says, “Nice run, but don’t get cocky.” Monte Carlo is just a fancy way of running thousands of alternate history paths, shuffling returns to see where things might land. Median outcome of £2,736 from £1,000 over 15 years with a wide “maybe” range from £929 to £7,530 screams uncertainty disguised as optimism. The average simulated return of about 8% a year is way tamer than the backward-looking 15% party. As usual, past data is yesterday’s weather: helpful to pack an umbrella, not enough to plan a beach wedding.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

Asset-class “diversification” here is brutally simple: 100% stocks, 0% everything else. No bonds, no cash buffer, no other stabilizers – just pure equity rollercoaster. Calling this “balanced” is like calling a Red Bull and espresso mix a “hydration strategy.” All-in on stocks can be fine if everyone involved understands it’s feast-or-famine territory, not a gentle glide path. The portfolio doesn’t even pretend to have a shock absorber built in. When markets party, this structure flies; when they sulk, there’s nowhere to hide except the “close app and don’t look” strategy.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    40%
  • Financials
    11%
  • Telecommunications
    10%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    9%
  • Industrials
    8%
  • Health Care
    7%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector-wise, this thing has a 40% tech habit, plus another hit from semiconductors inside that. The rest of the sectors are basically there for decoration: financials, telecoms, industrials and others are each just supporting actors in the “Big Tech Cinematic Universe.” Compared with a broad index, that tilt is aggressive, not subtle. If tech sneezes, this portfolio gets the flu. The good news is that the overweight matched the last cycle beautifully. The bad news is sector trends don’t send calendar invites before they reverse, and this portfolio is betting they never go out of fashion.

Regions Info

  • North America
    79%
  • Europe Developed
    9%
  • Asia Developed
    4%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Emerging
    3%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically it’s very much “America, please never disappoint me.” Roughly 79% in North America, with the rest of the world tossed in as a polite afterthought. Europe, Asia, emerging markets – all get slivers just big enough to appear on a chart but not big enough to matter when the US decides to have a mood swing. Compared with genuinely global allocations, that’s a serious home bias towards one market. The setup has been rewarded in a US-led decade, but if leadership rotates elsewhere, this portfolio’s “global” label will look more like marketing than reality.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    48%
  • Large-cap
    37%
  • Mid-cap
    15%

Market cap breakdown screams “index hugger with a growth twist”: 48% mega-cap, 37% large-cap, and a token 15% mid-cap. There’s basically zero attempt to tap into smaller, scruffier companies – you’ve backed the corporate giants and called it a day. That can keep things more liquid and a bit less chaotic, but it also means this portfolio lives and dies by the fate of a handful of global behemoths. When mega-caps dominate, it looks genius. When the market decides to favour smaller or cheaper names, this structure will feel like it showed up to the wrong party.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    6.39%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Apple Inc
    4.72%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Microsoft Corporation
    3.61%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Broadcom Inc
    2.93%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Amazon.com Inc
    2.73%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    2.23%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Meta Platforms Inc.
    1.89%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    1.88%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Tesla Inc
    1.65%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
    1.01%
    Part of fund(s):
    • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
  • Top 10 total 29.03%

The look-through holdings are a greatest-hits album on repeat. NVIDIA at 6.39%, Apple at 4.72%, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet (twice), Meta, Tesla, TSMC – all being owned multiple times via overlapping ETFs. This isn’t a portfolio of four funds; it’s the same top 10 megacap tech-growth names served three different ways plus a dedicated semiconductor shot. Overlap is actually understated here because only ETF top 10s are counted, so the true concentration is even higher. It’s diversification theatre: lots of fund names, one very crowded stage of the same usual suspects.

Risk contribution Info

  • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    Weight: 50.00%
    38.6%
  • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    Weight: 20.00%
    25.2%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    Weight: 20.00%
    19.2%
  • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
    Weight: 10.00%
    17.1%

Risk contribution reveals who’s really driving the drama, and the semiconductor ETF is wildly overachieving. At just 10% weight, it’s contributing 17% of total risk – a risk/weight ratio of 1.71, the portfolio’s resident adrenaline junkie. The hedged NASDAQ fund also pulls more than its weight at 25% of risk from 20% of capital. Meanwhile, the supposedly “safe” All-World fund is half the portfolio but only 39% of risk. The top three positions generating nearly 83% of total risk means this isn’t a four-engine plane; it’s one big engine and three decorative extras.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

On the efficient frontier, this portfolio is like a decent driver deliberately cruising in the middle lane while two better lanes sit empty. The Sharpe ratio of 0.73 sits below both the minimum variance option (0.87) and the max-Sharpe beast (1.0). The frontier says you’re 1.17 percentage points of return below what’s theoretically possible at your current risk level, just by shuffling weights between the same funds. In other words, even without adding anything new, the mix is leaving risk/return efficiency on the table. Not a disaster, but definitely not “wringing everything out” either.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF 0.35%
  • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) 0.35%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.07%
  • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.21%

Costs are the one area where this portfolio behaves like a responsible adult. A blended TER of 0.21% is pretty lean, especially given there’s a niche semiconductor ETF and a hedged NASDAQ product in the mix. That’s not rock-bottom index-cheap, but it’s far from daylight robbery. Think economy-plus pricing rather than first-class vanity. Still, the pricier satellite funds are where the fees quietly creep up: you’re paying extra for concentrated bets that overlap with what you already hold. At least the core choices show someone resisted the urge to collect expensive, shiny wrappers for no reason.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey