Quietly overachieving global stock portfolio with a mild small cap value addiction
Report created on Apr 4, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
SP SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
SPYI - IE00B3YLTY66 70.00% -
ME Amundi Stoxx Europe 600 UCITS ETF C USD
MEUS - LU0908500753 15.00% -
AV Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
AVWS - IE0003R87OG3 15.00%
Structurally this thing is almost suspiciously sensible: three ETFs, 100% stocks, and a boringly clean 70/15/15 split. No meme funds, no random side bets, no “I saw this on YouTube” clutter. It’s basically one global core, a Europe tilt, and a small cap value booster bolted on the side. The odd bit is calling this “balanced” when there isn’t a single bond, cash sleeve, or safety net in sight — that’s like calling an espresso martini “hydration.” Takeaway: the structure is streamlined and coherent, but anyone expecting bond‑like calm from a 100% equity mix is in for a very educational drawdown sooner or later.
Growth
Historically — all glorious 1.5 years of it — this portfolio actually looks like it knows what it’s doing: ~10.4% CAGR, turning €1,000 into about €1,158. It beat both the US market and the global market over this period, which is nice but also about as conclusive as judging a marathon from the first water station. The -20% max drawdown shows it can hit hard on the downside too, even within this short window. Past returns over such a tiny slice of time are more noise than prophecy; don’t mentally lock in “10% forever” just because the last year and a bit was kind.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projections paint a pretty optimistic picture: median outcome around €2,742 after 15 years from €1,000, with a wide “could be fine, could be chaos” range from roughly €1,030 to €7,933. Monte Carlo is basically a financial dice‑rolling machine — it takes past volatility and returns, scrambles them thousands of times, and guesses possible futures. The catch: we’re feeding it only ~1.5 years of history, which is like training a weather model on last month’s forecasts. So treat these numbers as rough vibes, not destiny. Takeaway: equity‑heavy portfolios tilt toward good long‑term odds, but the path can be ugly and the exact numbers are absolutely not a promise.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Asset classes? That section is very short: 100% stocks, 0% everything else. This is not “balanced,” this is “hope the market goes up before I need the cash.” There’s zero ballast from bonds, cash, or anything that doesn’t scream when volatility spikes. For someone with a very long horizon and a strong stomach, that can be perfectly fine; for anyone expecting smoother rides, this will feel like a roller coaster without a lap bar. General takeaway: if the plan involves short‑to‑medium‑term spending or sleep‑at‑night stability, a one‑asset‑class setup is more commitment than diversification.
Sectors
- Technology 20%
- Financials 18%
- Industrials 14%
- Consumer Discretionary 11%
- Health Care 9%
- Energy 7%
- Telecommunications 6%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Basic Materials 5%
- Utilities 3%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector mix is surprisingly grown‑up: tech leads at 20%, but it’s not an all‑in “AI or bust” dependency. Financials, industrials, consumer, health care, energy — everything shows up in decent doses, more like a broad market salad than a single‑flavor obsession. That’s good, because sector blowups happen, and being spread out keeps one area from nuking the whole portfolio. The mild roast: it’s basically an index hugger in sector terms, which means no bold convictions… but also no heroic unforced errors. Takeaway: sector risk here is pretty normal; the real excitement comes from being 100% in equities at all, not from any wild sector bets.
Regions
- North America 56%
- Europe Developed 27%
- Japan 6%
- Asia Developed 4%
- Asia Emerging 3%
- Australasia 2%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, this portfolio is firmly in “the world is real but home still matters” territory: ~56% North America and ~27% developed Europe, with the rest scattered across Japan, developed Asia, emerging Asia, and a token sliver elsewhere. So yes, it’s heavily US‑centric, but that’s also roughly how global market cap looks — the US just dominates. The extra Europe exposure tilts things a bit closer to the client’s own region, which is at least emotionally consistent. Takeaway: there’s no glaring geographic madness here; it’s global enough to avoid passport shame, with a subtle home‑flavored accent rather than full‑blown local bias.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 39%
- Large-cap 27%
- Mid-cap 16%
- Small-cap 11%
- Micro-cap 6%
Market cap spread is where it quietly gets more interesting: 39% mega‑cap down through 27% large, 16% mid, 11% small, and even 6% micro‑cap. That’s not typical “just buy big tech and chill” laziness; the added global small cap value exposure clearly drags the portfolio into the scrappier end of town. Those smaller names add potential long‑term return juice but also more wobble — small caps and micro caps are the ones that swing hardest when markets panic. Takeaway: this is not purely a sleepy mega‑cap index clone; it carries a deliberate tilt toward the unruly kids at the market cap table.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 2.74%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
-
AA Apple Inc 2.49%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 1.75%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.27%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.19%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1.03%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 0.95%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
-
AV Broadcom Inc 0.91%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 0.90%
Part of fund(s):- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
-
TS Tesla Inc 0.73%
Part of fund(s):- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
- Top 10 total 13.97%
The look‑through holdings scream “I outsourced my stock picking to the global mega‑cap club,” and honestly, fair. NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, TSMC, Meta, Tesla — the usual suspects are all here, just wrapped in ETFs instead of paraded as trophies. Overlap is clearly there, but we’re only seeing the ETF top 10, so the real duplication is much higher under the hood. This isn’t a flaw so much as a reality of broad index investing: when you buy “the world,” you’re marrying the biggest names whether you like them or not. The tradeoff is simplicity and diversification instead of clever‑sounding concentration.
Risk contribution
-
SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF
Weight: 70.00% 69.6% -
Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
Weight: 15.00% 16.5% -
Amundi Stoxx Europe 600 UCITS ETF C USD
Weight: 15.00% 13.9%
Risk contribution is refreshingly boring: the big 70% global ETF contributes almost exactly 70% of the risk, the other two are near their weights. No sneaky grenade hiding at 5% weight and delivering 25% of the drama. Risk contribution just shows who actually moves the needle when markets jump or sink, and here it’s exactly who you’d expect: the massive core position. Takeaway: if tweaks ever happen, small changes to that 70% chunk will matter far more than fussing around with the 15% side allocations. The portfolio isn’t secretly unhinged; the risk profile is pretty much what it says on the label.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk/return chart, this portfolio actually behaves like it knows math: it sits on or very near the efficient frontier. The efficient frontier is just the “best you can do with what you’ve got” curve — for each level of risk, it shows the highest feasible return using the existing holdings in different proportions. Your Sharpe ratio of 0.5 isn’t amazing, but given the inputs, the weighting is doing its job. The max‑Sharpe and min‑variance portfolios aren’t wildly different in risk, which is a good sign. Takeaway: within this limited 1.5‑year dataset and current ETF mix, the portfolio isn’t leaving easy efficiency on the table.
Ongoing product costs
- SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I Public Limited Company - SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI UCITS ETF 0.40%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.28%
Costs are… acceptable, with a side of “you could do better, but at least you’re not lighting money on fire.” A total TER of 0.28% is fine for a three‑ETF global mix, though that 0.40% on the core ACWI IMI chunk isn’t exactly bargain‑bin pricing these days. Think of it as flying economy with an airline that charges a bit too much for baggage: not outrageous, just mildly annoying over a couple of decades. Takeaway: fees won’t kill this portfolio, but shaving a few basis points over the long term is like quietly negotiating a permanent pay raise from your future self.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey