Roast mode 🔥

High-octane big tech shrine with one stock secretly doing all the panicking for everyone

Report created on Apr 22, 2026

Risk profile

  • Secure
    Speculative

The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.

Diversification profile

  • Focused
    Diversified

The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.

Positions

This isn’t a portfolio; it’s a fan club for six celebrity stocks plus one token emerging markets ETF to look worldly. More than 88% is in single names, which is basically running an all-star fantasy team with no bench. Diversification score says “moderately diversified,” which is generous — it’s diversified in the same way six different flavours of Red Bull is a balanced diet. Structurally, this is all-in on a narrow growth story, with no ballast, no plan B, and no attempt to hide it. When one of these names sneezes, the whole thing catches pneumonia. It’s conviction-heavy, sure, but also fragility-on-rails if anything breaks.

Growth Info

Historically, this thing has absolutely flown: £1,000 turning into £8,625 with a 44.54% CAGR is cartoon-level performance. The US market trudged along at 15.9%, global at 13.5%, while this rocket ship lapped them repeatedly. The bill for that speed shows up in the -45% max drawdown and the fact that 90% of returns came in just 39 days. That’s not smooth compounding; that’s “blink and you miss it” casino math. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) makes the ride look elegantly steady; the drawdown chart quietly reminds that living through it felt nothing like that. Past data here is a highlight reel, not a weather forecast.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection tries to turn this drama into probabilities, running 1,000 what-if futures. Median outcome of £2,723 over 15 years sounds almost tame next to the backtest fireworks, and the 8.09% average annualized return is basically “respectable growth fund” territory, not “tech cult rocket.” The range from about £1,017 to £7,746 just says the obvious: outcomes swing wildly when everything depends on a handful of volatile names. Monte Carlo is like simulating thousands of alternate timelines; it doesn’t predict which you’ll get, just shows how wide the chaos can spread. This portfolio’s future is more dice roll than gentle glide path.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

Asset classes are delightfully simple: 100% stocks, 0% everything else. This isn’t “aggressive”; it’s “hope nothing bad happens for 20 years.” There’s no bonds, no cash buffer, no alternative anything — just pure equity exposure wired straight into market sentiment. Asset allocation is usually where people balance excitement with boredom so the portfolio doesn’t emotionally blackmail them during big drops. Here, the boredom department has been completely fired. The result is maximum sensitivity to equity cycles with no internal shock absorbers. When the market mood flips from “AI euphoria” to “valuation hangover,” there’s nowhere inside this structure that isn’t on the same rollercoaster.

Sectors Info

  • No data
    55%
  • Technology
    36%
  • Financials
    3%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    1%
  • Telecommunications
    1%
  • Basic Materials
    1%
  • Industrials
    1%
  • Energy
    1%

Sector split screams “we don’t track sectors, we worship growth.” Around 36% is explicitly technology, but another huge chunk is hidden inside large platform and internet-style businesses sitting in “no data.” So the label says mixed, but the economic reality is a tightly wound bet on digital platforms, software, chips, and online commerce, with token slivers in other sectors so tiny they may as well be decorative. Compared to broad indexes, this is like taking the most volatile growth-y slice and pretending that plus a few crumbs is a full meal. When that cluster is in favour, life is great; when it isn’t, sector exposure becomes a synchronized dive.

Regions Info

  • North America
    75%
  • No data
    13%
  • Asia Emerging
    6%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geography is basically North America or bust: 75% there, a thin sprinkle of emerging Asia and developed Asia, and a rounding error elsewhere. The emerging markets ETF adds a veneer of global awareness, but it’s 12% weight trying to offset a hulking North American core. This is the classic home-region obsession, just done from a UK base with a US-tech crush. Global markets are much more spread out, but this setup behaves like the world only really matters where the big tech and one Latin e-commerce name live. If that region stumbles or its currency throws a tantrum, this portfolio doesn’t exactly have other continents ready to pick up the slack.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    54%
  • No data
    40%
  • Large-cap
    4%
  • Mid-cap
    2%

Market cap is hilariously one-sided: 54% mega-cap, a tiny bit of large and mid, and 40% tagged “no data” that is almost certainly still dominated by giants. This is a who’s-who of companies that already won, not a balanced mix of small scrappy upstarts and established behemoths. That means the portfolio is wired into whatever mood swings hit the market’s biggest, most crowded trades. When the mega-cap darlings are loved, this looks genius; when narrative shifts to smaller or cheaper names, this construction just sits there looking surprised. There’s no real size diversification; it’s fully leaning into the same end of the pool as everyone else, just with far fewer names.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    18.00%
  • Microsoft Corporation
    15.00%
  • Meta Platforms
    15.00%
  • Amazon.com Inc.
    15.00%
  • MercadoLibre Inc.
    13.00%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc
    12.00%
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
    1.71%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD Accumulation GBP
  • Tencent Holdings Ltd
    0.49%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD Accumulation GBP
  • Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
    0.35%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD Accumulation GBP
  • Reliance Industries Limited
    0.12%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD Accumulation GBP
  • Top 10 total 90.67%

Look-through holdings are almost comically clean: the top exposures are exactly the six single stocks, with the ETF barely adding any meaningful overlap yet. NVIDIA 18%, Microsoft 15%, Meta 15%, Amazon 15%, MercadoLibre 13%, Berkshire 12% — that’s the portfolio. The ETF sprinkles in bits of TSMC, Tencent, Alibaba, and others, but they’re background extras, not main characters. Overlap being low here isn’t clever design; it’s just that 88% of the portfolio didn’t bother using funds in the first place. Hidden concentration isn’t even hidden — it’s just concentration, full stop. One or two names getting derated doesn’t bruise this portfolio; it punches straight through the ribcage.

Risk contribution Info

  • MercadoLibre Inc.
    Weight: 13.00%
    64.3%
  • NVIDIA Corporation
    Weight: 18.00%
    12.1%
  • Meta Platforms
    Weight: 15.00%
    8.1%
  • Amazon.com Inc.
    Weight: 15.00%
    6.6%
  • Microsoft Corporation
    Weight: 15.00%
    5.0%
  • Top 5 risk contribution 96.0%

Risk contribution is where the comedy turns dark: MercadoLibre is 13% of the weight and a ridiculous 64.25% of total portfolio risk. That’s not a position; that’s a boss fight. Its risk/weight of 4.94 means it’s hogging volatility like it owns the place. Meanwhile NVIDIA, Meta, and Amazon are big weights but relatively “tame” in risk terms here, leaving one stock doing most of the shaking. Top three risk contributors add up to 84.45% of all portfolio risk, so despite seven holdings, risk-wise this behaves like a 2–3 stock bet with side decoration. The official risk score of 6/7 feels almost polite compared to what the risk math is actually screaming.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On the efficient frontier, this portfolio is proudly inefficient: 17.64 percentage points below the frontier at its current risk level, with a Sharpe ratio of 1.0 versus 1.53 for the optimal mix of the *same* holdings. The efficient frontier is basically the “best possible trade-offs” curve using these ingredients. Sitting that far below it means the current weights are leaving a lot of risk-adjusted return on the table for no extra thrill, more like carrying a heavy backpack full of rocks instead of useful stuff. The minimum variance version still gets a 0.78 Sharpe with much lower risk, while the optimal portfolio manages more return for almost identical volatility. This setup scores high on conviction, low on efficiency.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey