Mostly US stock index mix with strong growth tilt and impressively low all in costs
Report created on Apr 12, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
Positions
-
VO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
VOO - US9229083632 42.01% -
VF VANGUARD TARGET RETIREMENT 2055 FUND INVESTOR SHARES
VFFVX - US92202E8479 35.77% -
VT Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
VTI - US9229087690 20.87% -
ST BLACKROCK LIFEPATH DYNAMIC 2050 FUND INSTITUTIONAL SHARES
STLFX - US06739T5561 1.35%
The portfolio is built almost entirely from four broad funds, with a clear tilt toward US stocks. Roughly two thirds sits in a target date 2055 fund and an S&P 500 ETF, with the rest in a total US stock ETF and a tiny slice of a 2050 target date fund. This keeps things simple and rules‑based, relying on built‑in diversification rather than lots of individual picks. For a balanced-risk profile, the structure leans growthy because the target date funds are still equity-heavy at this stage. The main takeaway is that this is a streamlined, largely “set and forget” lineup, but it’s more aggressive than the 4/7 risk score might suggest based purely on the near‑full stock exposure.
Growth
Historically, $1,000 invested in this mix in 2016 would have grown to about $3,586, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.67%. CAGR is like your average speed on a long road trip, smoothing out the bumps along the way. This has slightly lagged the US market (by 0.81% per year) but beaten the global market by 1.70% per year, which is a solid result. The worst peak‑to‑trough fall was about -33% during early 2020, similar to both benchmarks, with a quick recovery in around five months. That behavior is very much in line with a stock‑heavy portfolio. Remember, though, that past performance doesn’t guarantee anything about the next decade.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection looks at thousands of possible 15‑year paths by remixing patterns from historical data. Think of it as running 1,000 parallel futures, then seeing where most of them land. Here, a $1,000 starting amount has a “most likely” median outcome around $2,708, with a fairly wide typical range between about $1,797 and $4,092. The overall average simulated return is 7.95% per year, and roughly three quarters of simulations end positive. That’s encouraging, but still just a statistical model: it can’t foresee new crises or regime shifts. The practical takeaway is that outcomes are likely positive but can vary a lot, so planning should allow for both upside and downside scenarios.
Asset classes
- Stocks 97%
- Bonds 3%
About 97% of the portfolio is in stocks and only around 3% in bonds. Asset classes are broad buckets like stocks, bonds, and cash, and how you mix them is one of the biggest drivers of risk. Compared with a typical “balanced” mix (often closer to 60% stocks and 40% bonds), this allocation is much more growth‑oriented and will swing more with equity markets. That can be rewarding over long horizons but uncomfortable during big drawdowns. The target date funds will gradually add more bonds as the target year approaches, but right now this is effectively an equity‑dominated strategy. It works best for someone who can ride through multi‑year stock market downturns without needing to tap the money.
Sectors
- Technology 30%
- Financials 14%
- Industrials 11%
- Health Care 10%
- Telecommunications 9%
- Consumer Discretionary 6%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Energy 4%
- Consumer Discretionary 4%
- Basic Materials 3%
- Utilities 3%
- Real Estate 2%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Sector‑wise, the portfolio is led by roughly 30% in technology, then meaningful allocations to financials, industrials, health care, and telecommunications, with smaller slices in staples, energy, materials, utilities, and real estate. This looks broadly similar to US large‑cap benchmarks, though the tech share is on the higher side because of today’s market structure. Tech‑heavy exposure can supercharge returns during innovation booms and low‑rate environments, but it can also hurt more when rates rise or regulation bites. The positive here is that non‑tech sectors still make up the majority, so it’s not a pure tech bet. Still, expectations should include a bit more volatility than a more defensive, dividend‑tilted sector mix.
Regions
- North America 85%
- Europe Developed 6%
- Japan 2%
- Asia Developed 2%
- Asia Emerging 2%
- Australasia 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Geographically, around 85% of the portfolio sits in North America, with modest allocations to developed Europe, Japan, developed Asia, emerging Asia, Australasia, and Africa/Middle East. A global market benchmark usually has the US closer to 60%–65%, so this is a clear home‑country tilt. That’s been a tailwind over the last decade because US stocks have led the world, helping the portfolio outpace the global market. The flip side is higher dependence on a single economy, currency, and policy regime. If non‑US markets lead in the future, or if the dollar weakens significantly, this tilt may become a drag. It’s a trade‑off between familiarity and broader global diversification.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 42%
- Large-cap 31%
- Mid-cap 17%
- Small-cap 3%
- Micro-cap 1%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
By market capitalization, the mix is dominated by mega‑caps and large‑caps (about 73% combined), with smaller but still meaningful exposure to mid‑caps and a bit in small and micro‑caps. Market cap just means company size; bigger firms tend to be more stable but may grow slower, while smaller ones can be more volatile but offer more growth potential. This profile is quite similar to broad US and global indices, which are also mega‑cap heavy. That alignment is actually a positive: it means you’re capturing the main market engines without making an extreme bet on tiny or speculative names. The small and mid‑cap slices still add some extra growth and diversification on the margins.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 4.36%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AA Apple Inc 4.02%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 3.00%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 2.09%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.87%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.56%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.48%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 1.45%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
TS Tesla Inc 1.17%
Part of fund(s):- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
BR Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.95%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
- Top 10 total 21.95%
Looking through the funds, the biggest underlying exposures are familiar mega‑cap names like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Broadcom, Meta, Tesla, and Berkshire. These appear across multiple funds, which quietly boosts concentration even though it looks diversified on the surface. Because only ETF top‑10 holdings are used, actual overlap is almost certainly higher than shown. This is normal for index‑heavy portfolios, but it does mean a lot of the long‑term outcome is tied to a relatively small group of dominant US companies. The upside is strong participation in market leaders; the risk is that if these giants underperform, the whole portfolio feels it more than the fund list suggests.
Factors
Factor exposure across value, size, momentum, quality, yield, and low volatility sits pretty much in the “neutral” zone, close to 50% on each. Factors are like underlying investing “styles” — for example, value favors cheaper stocks, momentum favors recent winners, and quality leans into stronger balance sheets. Being neutral means this portfolio behaves a lot like the overall market, without strong tilts toward or away from any particular style. That’s actually very consistent with a cap‑weighted index approach. The practical implication is that performance will mostly be driven by broad market moves rather than factor bets, which keeps things straightforward but may miss periods when certain factors shine or hedge particular risks.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Weight: 42.01% 44.6% -
VANGUARD TARGET RETIREMENT 2055 FUND INVESTOR SHARES
Weight: 35.77% 31.7% -
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 20.87% 22.5% -
BLACKROCK LIFEPATH DYNAMIC 2050 FUND INSTITUTIONAL SHARES
Weight: 1.35% 1.1%
Risk contribution shows how much each holding drives the portfolio’s ups and downs, which can differ from its simple weight. Here, the S&P 500 ETF is 42% of the portfolio but contributes about 45% of total risk, while the total market ETF is 21% of weight but about 23% of risk. The target date 2055 fund actually contributes slightly less risk than its weight suggests, likely due to its internal diversification and small bond slice. The top three holdings together account for nearly 99% of overall risk, which is expected given how small the fourth holding is. If a smoother ride is desired, adjusting the split between these core funds usually has more impact than tinkering with minor positions.
Redundant positions
-
High correlationVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF SharesVanguard S&P 500 ETF
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together. A correlation near 1 means they rise and fall almost in lockstep, like two cars tied to the same tow rope. In this portfolio, the S&P 500 ETF and the Total Stock Market ETF are highly correlated, which makes sense because both are broad US equity funds with overlapping holdings. That means holding both doesn’t add much extra diversification — it’s more like owning slightly different flavors of the same ice cream. This isn’t inherently bad, but it does limit the benefit you get during market stress, since both are likely to move sharply in the same direction when US stocks are under pressure.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk‑return chart, the current portfolio has an expected return of 14.25% with volatility of 16.84% and a Sharpe ratio of 0.61. The Sharpe ratio compares return to risk, like measuring how much “bang for your buck” you get per unit of volatility. The efficient frontier shows that, using these same holdings, a different mix could potentially reach a Sharpe of 0.94 at slightly higher return with similar risk, or 0.81 at lower risk with modestly lower return. Since the current point sits about 2.5 percentage points below the frontier, there’s headroom to fine‑tune weights for better risk‑adjusted returns without adding new funds, while still staying within the same simple product set.
Dividends
- VANGUARD TARGET RETIREMENT 2055 FUND INVESTOR SHARES 2.00%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.41%
The blended dividend yield of around 1.41% is modest, with the target date fund yielding about 2% and the main ETFs just over 1%. Dividends are the cash payments companies make to shareholders and can be an important part of total return, especially in lower‑growth environments. In a growth‑oriented, stock‑heavy mix like this, most of the value comes from price appreciation rather than income. That’s well‑aligned with a long‑term, accumulation‑focused approach where reinvesting dividends helps compound returns. For someone looking for near‑term cash flow, though, this level of yield would feel relatively low, and they’d be relying more on selling shares than on ongoing income.
Ongoing product costs
- BLACKROCK LIFEPATH DYNAMIC 2050 FUND INSTITUTIONAL SHARES 0.25%
- VANGUARD TARGET RETIREMENT 2055 FUND INVESTOR SHARES 0.08%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.05%
The total expense ratio (TER) for the portfolio is impressively low at about 0.05% per year. TER is the annual fee taken by funds to cover management and operating costs, and it quietly eats into returns over time. Here, the main building blocks charge between 0.03% and 0.08%, which is right at the leading edge of low‑cost indexing. Over decades, the difference between paying 0.05% and, say, 0.50% can compound into many thousands of dollars on a sizeable portfolio. This cost profile is a real strength: it means more of the market’s return stays in your pocket and less leaks away to fees, which supports better long‑term performance.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey