Highly concentrated tech heavy portfolio aligned with strong growth focus and efficient risk taking
Report created on Apr 11, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
Positions
-
QQ Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM - US46138G6492 50.00% -
VG Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
VGT - US92204A7028 50.00%
This portfolio is ultra-simple: two equity ETFs at 50% each, both heavily focused on growth-oriented companies. There are no bonds, cash, or alternative assets here, so everything rides on the stock market, and specifically on a narrow slice of it. Simple structures like this are easy to understand and monitor, which is a plus. But with only two very similar funds, you’re basically making one big thematic bet rather than running a broadly diversified mix. The key takeaway is that this setup is built for growth and volatility, not stability, and any future tweaks would likely revolve around adding different types of assets or strategies, not more of the same.
Growth
Historically, the portfolio has delivered strong returns: a $1,000 investment grew to about $2,201, with a 15.52% compound annual growth rate (CAGR). CAGR is like your average speed on a long road trip, smoothing out all the bumps and traffic. You beat both the US market and the global market by a healthy margin, which shows the tech and growth tilt worked very well in this period. The trade-off was a deep max drawdown of -35.22%, meaning you had to sit through a third of the value temporarily disappearing. This pattern fits a growth profile: impressive upside but emotionally and financially demanding drawdowns.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection uses thousands of random paths based on historical patterns to estimate possible future outcomes. Think of it as running the next 15 years 1,000 different ways, then seeing the distribution of results. The median outcome grows $1,000 to about $2,779, with a wide possible range from roughly $937 to $8,015. That spread reflects how unpredictable markets are, especially for a growth-heavy portfolio. Around 73.5% of simulations end positive, which is encouraging but far from guaranteed. The key limitation is that simulations lean on the past; if tech or growth leadership changes drastically, real-life results could look very different from these modelled numbers.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Every dollar here sits in stocks, with zero exposure to bonds, cash, or other asset classes. That’s perfectly aligned with a growth-first mindset and long time horizon, but it also means there’s no built-in shock absorber when markets fall. In more diversified portfolios, bonds or defensive assets can help smooth the ride by behaving differently during stress. Here, overall volatility will be close to the ups and downs of an aggressive equity index, or even higher due to concentration. For someone comfortable with large swings and not needing near-term withdrawals, this can be acceptable, but it leaves little room for capital preservation during big downturns.
Sectors
- Technology 75%
- Telecommunications 8%
- Consumer Discretionary 6%
- Consumer Staples 4%
- Health Care 2%
- Industrials 2%
- Utilities 1%
- Basic Materials 1%
Sector-wise, the portfolio is overwhelmingly tilted to technology at about 75%, with only modest exposure to areas like telecommunications, consumer sectors, health care, and industrials. That’s far more tech-heavy than broad market benchmarks, where tech is important but not this dominant. Tech-focused portfolios tend to do very well when innovation and growth are in favor and interest rates are stable or falling, but they can get hit hard during rate hikes or when markets rotate into more cyclical or defensive areas. The benefit is powerful participation in tech booms; the risk is sharp drawdowns if sentiment turns against this sector or regulatory and competitive pressures rise.
Regions
- North America 98%
- Europe Developed 1%
Geographically, almost everything is concentrated in North America, around 98%, with only a tiny slice in developed Europe. This lines up closely with the funds’ focus and has been favorable over the last decade as US markets, especially large-cap tech, have outperformed many other regions. The flip side is that economic, political, or regulatory shocks in one region—the US in particular—will dominate your results. A more globally spread approach would usually include bigger chunks of other regions, helping balance out country-specific risks. Here, performance is tightly tied to the US economy, US dollar, and the policy environment affecting US-listed growth companies.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 52%
- Large-cap 30%
- Mid-cap 11%
- Small-cap 4%
- Micro-cap 2%
The portfolio leans heavily into mega-cap and large-cap stocks, with around 82% in those size buckets and only modest exposure to mid, small, and micro caps. Market capitalization describes company size on the stock market; mega-caps are the giants everyone knows. This skew is common in index-based strategies and often brings advantages like stronger balance sheets, more diversified businesses, and better liquidity. The trade-off is you miss some of the higher-growth, higher-volatility potential that smaller companies can sometimes offer. Your portfolio’s behavior will therefore be quite similar to a “big tech and large growth” profile, rather than a broad blend of different company sizes.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 13.36%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AA Apple Inc 11.73%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 7.97%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AV Broadcom Inc 3.67%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
TS Tesla Inc 1.77%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.75%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
WM Walmart Inc. Common Stock 1.72%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 1.69%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.62%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
- Top 10 total 47.56%
Looking through the ETFs, there’s heavy underlying exposure to a handful of mega-cap names: NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Broadcom, Amazon, Tesla, Alphabet, Walmart, and Meta all feature prominently. Several appear in both funds, which means hidden overlap and more concentration than the two-ticker list suggests. Because this analysis only sees ETF top-10 holdings, the true overlap is probably even higher. When the same giants show up everywhere, their performance largely drives the portfolio’s results. The positive side is these are globally dominant businesses; the risk is that you’re very reliant on a small group of companies continuing to lead markets.
Factors
Factor exposure shows strong tilts away from value (15%) and away from yield and low volatility (both 30%), with neutral exposure to momentum and quality. Factors are like investing “ingredients” that explain why certain stocks move together. A very low value score means you’re heavily tilted toward more expensive, growth-oriented companies rather than bargains. Low yield and low volatility exposures mean you’re not leaning into steady dividend payers or smoother price paths. Instead, you’re aligned with higher-growth, potentially more volatile names. This setup can shine when growth is rewarded, but it can underperform when markets favor cheaper, more defensive, or income-focused stocks.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 50.00% 52.9% -
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Weight: 50.00% 47.1%
Risk contribution shows how much each holding adds to the portfolio’s overall ups and downs, which can differ from simple weights. Here, risk is split fairly evenly: the Vanguard IT ETF contributes about 52.86% of total risk versus its 50% weight, while the Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF contributes 47.14% versus its 50% weight. That’s very balanced and aligns nicely with the intended 50/50 split. What stands out more is that the top two holdings drive 100% of the risk because they are the entire portfolio. So while risk is shared between the ETFs, real diversification of risk across very different drivers is still limited.
Redundant positions
-
High correlationInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETFVanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
The two ETFs in this portfolio are highly correlated, meaning they tend to move almost identically day to day. Correlation measures how often things go up and down together; when it’s very high, owning both is a bit like holding one position in disguise. High correlation isn’t inherently bad, especially if you deliberately want focused exposure, but it does cap diversification benefits. When the tech-heavy growth style they share is in favor, that tight relationship boosts returns. When it’s out of favor, there’s nowhere to hide within the portfolio itself, and both positions will likely drop at the same time and by similar amounts.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk–return chart, the current mix sits right on or very near the efficient frontier, meaning it’s already using these two holdings in an efficient way. The efficient frontier represents the best return you can expect for each level of risk using just the existing ingredients. The portfolio’s Sharpe ratio—risk-adjusted return—looks solid relative to the optimal and minimum-variance points given the limited choice set. Importantly, this tells you the main “knob” left to turn isn’t reweighting between these two ETFs, but deciding whether the overall risk level and concentration in one style is appropriate. Structurally, for what it is, the allocation is very well-tuned.
Dividends
- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
- Weighted yield (per year) 0.30%
Dividend yield is very low at around 0.30% overall, which makes sense for a growth-tilted, tech-heavy portfolio. Many of these companies prefer to reinvest profits into expansion rather than pay out large cash dividends. For investors focused on long-term growth and total return, low yield isn’t a problem; the expectation is that value builds primarily through price appreciation. However, for someone seeking regular income, this setup would be a poor match because the cash flow from dividends alone would be minimal. Over time, any dividends you do receive can still contribute a small boost to compounding if they’re reinvested back into the market.
Ongoing product costs
- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.12%
Costs are impressively low, with a total expense ratio (TER) of about 0.12%. TER is the annual fee the funds charge to manage your money, and keeping this small is one of the few things investors can control. This level is well below many actively managed funds and aligns with best practices for cost-efficient investing. Low fees mean more of the portfolio’s gross return reaches you rather than going to managers, which compounds into real money over long horizons. From a cost perspective, this setup is very strong and supports good long-term performance, assuming the underlying growth and tech themes continue to deliver.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey