A growth focused US heavy equity portfolio with strong dividend tilt and moderate diversification
Report created on Mar 13, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
3/5
Positions
-
VT Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
VTI - US9229087690 30.00% -
QQ Invesco QQQ Trust
QQQ - US46090E1038 20.00% -
SC Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
SCHD - US8085247976 20.00% -
VI Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
VIG - US9219088443 20.00% -
VX Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
VXUS - US9219097683 10.00%
This portfolio is built entirely from broad, liquid stock ETFs, with roughly half in total market funds and half in growth and dividend strategies. It leans toward a “Balanced” risk profile within an all‑equity framework, since there are no bonds or cash buffers. Compared with a classic stock‑bond benchmark, this structure is more aggressive, but within global equity benchmarks it looks fairly standard and well-constructed. This allocation is well-balanced and aligns closely with global standards for equity-only investors. Anyone using a setup like this could consider whether they want an explicit safety bucket elsewhere, or if they prefer to stay fully invested in stocks and manage risk mainly through diversification and time horizon.
Growth
Historically, this mix delivered a strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 15.2%. CAGR is like your average speed on a long road trip, smoothing out bumps along the way. A $10,000 starting amount growing at that pace for 10 years would hypothetically reach around $41,000, though actual paths are much messier. The portfolio also saw a maximum drawdown of about -32%, meaning at one point the value fell roughly a third from a prior peak. That level of drop is consistent with an all‑equity mix and shows real downside risk. Past performance never guarantees future results, so using these numbers as a rough guide rather than a promise is important.
Projection
The Monte Carlo analysis, using 1,000 simulations, suggests a wide range of possible future outcomes. Monte Carlo is basically a statistical “what if” engine: it shuffles and replays return patterns based on historical data to see many possible futures. The median (50th percentile) scenario ends at about 538% of the starting value, while the pessimistic 5th percentile is roughly flat at 98%, and the more optimistic 67th percentile near 777%. The average simulated annual return is around 15.9%, close to history. These numbers look attractive but are not predictions; they simply show that even good return expectations still come with scenarios where growth stalls or lags for long stretches.
Asset classes
- Stocks 99%
The portfolio is 99% in stocks, with effectively no allocation to bonds, cash, or alternatives. That’s aggressive compared with most “balanced” benchmarks, which usually mix equities with more stable assets to cushion downturns. Being all‑equity can work well for long horizons and strong stomachs, but it also means bigger swings and deeper temporary losses. For someone wanting smoother ride quality, holding some separate bond or cash exposure outside this portfolio might be worth considering. For a long-term growth-focus, this equity-heavy stance is logically consistent, but clarity about where short‑term safety lives (bank accounts, emergency funds, etc.) becomes especially important.
Sectors
- Technology 29%
- Financials 12%
- Health Care 11%
- Consumer Discretionary 10%
- Industrials 9%
- Consumer Staples 9%
- Telecommunications 8%
- Energy 6%
- Basic Materials 2%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 1%
Sector exposure is tilted toward technology at about 29%, with meaningful stakes in financials, healthcare, consumer cyclicals, and industrials, and modest weight in defensives like utilities and consumer staples. This is fairly close to typical US market sector mixes but a bit more tech-leaning due to the growth ETF. Tech-heavy allocations often perform very well during innovation and low-rate environments but can be more volatile during rate hikes or regulatory shocks. The sector mix is otherwise broad and healthy, which is a strong indicator of diversification. To fine-tune risk, an investor might occasionally check whether technology’s share is creeping even higher and decide if that concentration still feels appropriate.
Regions
- North America 90%
- Europe Developed 4%
- Asia Emerging 2%
- Japan 2%
- Asia Developed 1%
Geographically, the portfolio is heavily tilted to North America at about 90%, with small allocations to developed Europe and Asia, plus limited emerging markets exposure. This US dominance mirrors many domestic investor portfolios and has been rewarded over the last decade as US markets outperformed. However, it does mean results are closely tied to the fate of one economy and currency. Global diversification can help when leadership rotates to other regions. The current 10% international slice is modest; for someone wanting more global balance, gradually nudging that portion higher over time could reduce home-country concentration while still keeping the US as the core growth engine.
Market capitalization
- Large-cap 40%
- Mega-cap 34%
- Mid-cap 19%
- Small-cap 4%
- Micro-cap 1%
By market capitalization, the mix is strongly tilted toward mega and large companies, with about 74% in mega and big caps, 19% in mid caps, and only small slivers in small and micro caps. Large companies tend to be more stable, better researched, and less volatile than tiny firms, though they may not always deliver the fastest growth. This large-cap bias is typical and aligns with common benchmarks, which is beneficial for predictability and liquidity. If extra diversification or growth potential is desired, a slightly higher allocation to smaller caps could be considered, but only if the added volatility is acceptable and the overall risk profile still feels comfortable.
True holdings
-
AA Apple Inc 4.00%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 3.73%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 3.38%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AV Broadcom Inc 2.58%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.93%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.58%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 1.45%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.35%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
TS Tesla Inc 1.32%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
LL Eli Lilly and Company 1.14%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
- Top 10 total 22.47%
Looking through to the top underlying holdings, exposure is concentrated in large US growth names like Apple, NVIDIA, Microsoft, Amazon, the Alphabet share classes, and Meta. Because only ETF top‑10 holdings are used, overlap and concentration are likely understated; the true weights in these names are probably higher. This matters because multiple ETFs owning the same giants can make the portfolio behave more like a focused growth basket than it appears from the ETF labels alone. A practical step is to review whether this large-cap growth clustering matches the intended style, and if not, gradually shift a slice toward more diversified or differently tilted funds over time.
Factors
Factor exposure shows strong tilts toward size, yield, and low volatility, with moderate momentum and value. Factor exposure basically describes how much the portfolio leans into certain characteristics, like high dividends or lower price swings, that research has linked to returns over time. The yield tilt comes from the dividend ETFs, boosting income above pure growth funds. Low volatility exposure suggests somewhat smoother rides than an all‑growth lineup might produce, which aligns with the “Balanced” profile. Data coverage for some factors is partial, so these readings are approximate, not precise. If more growth or value tilt is desired, small adjustments among existing ETFs could shift the factor mix without overhauling the structure.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 30.00% 31.7% -
Invesco QQQ Trust
Weight: 20.00% 23.9% -
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 20.00% 18.1% -
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Weight: 20.00% 17.7% -
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 10.00% 8.7%
Risk contribution shows how much each holding drives the portfolio’s overall ups and downs, which can differ from its weight. For example, QQQ sits at 20% of assets but contributes nearly 24% of total risk, giving it a risk-to-weight ratio of 1.20. That means it punches above its size in terms of volatility impact. The top three positions together account for about 74% of total portfolio risk, indicating some concentration. Risk contribution is like noticing which instruments dominate the orchestra. To keep any single fund from overshadowing the rest, occasional rebalancing or trimming the highest risk contributors may help align actual risk with the intended balanced risk score.
Redundant positions
-
High correlationVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF SharesVanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
Asset correlation measures how often investments move together; a correlation of 1 means they behave almost identically, while 0 means they move independently. Here, the total US market ETF and the US dividend appreciation ETF are highly correlated, which reduces the diversification benefit between them. In practice, owning two very similar funds can feel like duplicates during market swings. This correlation isn’t inherently bad, especially since both are broad and low-cost, but it does mean the number of line items is a bit higher than necessary for the diversification achieved. Streamlining slightly could simplify tracking without meaningfully changing overall behavior.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
Risk versus return could likely be improved slightly using an Efficient Frontier framework. The Efficient Frontier is a curve of portfolios that offer the best possible trade-off between risk and return, given the available ingredients. Here, optimization would only reshuffle weights among the five existing ETFs, not introduce new ones. Because some holdings are highly correlated and QQQ contributes more than its share of risk, small weight adjustments might reduce volatility without sacrificing much expected return. Efficiency doesn’t always mean more diversification or lower drawdowns in every scenario, but it can help the portfolio use its current building blocks in a more risk-conscious, mathematically balanced way.
Dividends
- Invesco QQQ Trust 0.50%
- Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.40%
- Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares 1.60%
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 3.10%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.74%
The overall dividend yield is around 1.74%, boosted by the dedicated dividend ETFs, which offer yields up to the mid‑3% range. Dividend yield is the annual cash payout as a percentage of price, like rent from a property. For a growth-oriented equity portfolio, this level of income is reasonable and balanced: higher than pure growth but not so high that it likely sacrifices quality or long-term growth. Dividends can help smooth returns, especially in flat markets, and can be reinvested to compound over time. If future income needs become a priority, gradually increasing the allocation to higher-yielding holdings could raise the portfolio’s cash flow without drastic restructuring.
Ongoing product costs
- Invesco QQQ Trust 0.20%
- Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
- Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares 0.06%
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.08%
The blended total expense ratio (TER) is impressively low at about 0.08%. TER is the annual fee charged by the funds, taken directly from returns, like a small management toll. Keeping costs this low is a major strength because every fraction of a percent saved compounds over decades. This cost profile compares very favorably to both active funds and many robo or advisory options and supports better long-term performance. The current lineup already sits in the “best practice” zone on fees, so there is little to gain by chasing marginally cheaper alternatives. Maintaining this low-cost discipline is one of the easiest wins in long-term investing.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey