A highly growth focused us centric stock portfolio with strong tech tilt and very low costs

Report created on Sep 17, 2024

Risk profile Info

7/7
Speculative
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is built almost entirely around broad US stock exposure, with a heavy tilt to large growth companies. The core holding tracks a major US index, complemented by a concentrated growth index, a small cap value tilt, and a global ex‑US fund. This creates a powerful growth engine but leaves the mix 100% in stocks, with no bonds or cash buffer. That structure matters because it magnifies both gains and losses. For someone with a speculative risk profile, this alignment is intentional, but it still helps to decide what maximum drop in value feels tolerable and whether adding even a small stabilizing sleeve would make future volatility easier to live with.

Growth Info

The reported historical CAGR above 500% is clearly a data or calculation error; no diversified ETF mix has grown anything like that over realistic timeframes. More meaningful is the maximum drawdown of around -25%, which is believable for a stock‑only mix tilted to growth. Max drawdown is simply the worst peak‑to‑trough decline, showing what kind of pain an investor might have felt in a bad stretch. Also, the idea that 90% of returns came from just one day is another red flag about the dataset. In practice, it helps to assume stock‑heavy portfolios can fall 30–50% at times and to check whether that’s emotionally and financially manageable.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo simulation output here is also obviously broken: a median outcome of -100% and zero positive simulations is not realistic for a diversified ETF portfolio. Monte Carlo is meant to simulate many possible futures using historical return and volatility patterns, giving a range of potential outcomes instead of a single forecast. It’s a planning tool, not a prediction machine. When the inputs or outputs are clearly off, it’s better to fall back on reasonable expectations, like long‑run stock returns in the mid‑single to low‑double digits with big swings. Any planning around withdrawals, goals, or debt should assume uncertainty and leave a healthy margin of safety.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All holdings are in one asset class: stocks. That’s simple and powerful for growth but offers zero built‑in ballast during market stress. Asset classes like bonds, cash, or alternatives typically move differently than stocks, smoothing the ride. A 100% stock stance can be a good fit for long horizons and strong stomachs, yet it also means any crash fully hits portfolio value. This allocation is aggressive even compared with typical “growth” benchmarks, which usually include some bonds. It can help to think of this as a “pure engine” portfolio and decide whether to keep safety reserves in separate accounts or later introduce a small stabilizing component.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    35%
  • Financials
    13%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    12%
  • Telecommunications
    10%
  • Industrials
    8%
  • Health Care
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is clearly growth‑tilted, with technology around a third of the portfolio plus sizable weights in communication services and consumer cyclicals. That’s broadly similar to major US growth benchmarks but with an extra lean into tech and related areas. This setup tends to do very well when innovation, lower interest rates, and strong consumer demand drive markets, but it can be hit hard when rates rise or when investors rotate toward more defensive parts of the economy. The sector mix is reasonably diversified across the full economy, which is positive, yet the tech and growth skew means volatility may be higher than a more evenly balanced stock portfolio.

Regions Info

  • North America
    90%
  • Europe Developed
    4%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Japan
    2%
  • Asia Developed
    1%

Geographically, the portfolio is heavily concentrated in North America at around 90%, with only modest exposure to Europe and Asia. That US‑centric stance has matched or beaten many global benchmarks over the last decade, so the alignment with common domestic investor behavior has been rewarded. However, it also means country‑specific risks—policy, regulation, currency, or valuation—are not diluted much by overseas holdings. A small international slice is present and that’s a plus for diversification, but it’s still much lower than global market weight. Over long horizons, nudging toward a more balanced global share can reduce reliance on any single economy’s fortunes.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    43%
  • Large-cap
    31%
  • Mid-cap
    15%
  • Small-cap
    6%
  • Micro-cap
    5%

Market cap exposure is dominated by mega and big companies, with smaller slices of mid, small, and micro caps. This pattern closely resembles broad US benchmarks, which is good for stability and liquidity, but the added small cap value ETF does introduce a welcome tilt to smaller, cheaper companies. Larger firms tend to be more stable and widely followed, while smaller ones can be more volatile but sometimes offer higher long‑term return potential. This mix is a solid structure for growth‑oriented investors: it keeps most of the portfolio in established names while still leaving room for the potentially higher‑octane behavior of smaller companies through that dedicated tilt.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk‑return chart, this portfolio likely sits toward the high‑risk, high‑return end of the spectrum. The Efficient Frontier is a curve showing, for a given group of assets, which mixes historically offered the best trade‑off between risk (ups and downs) and return. Because the building blocks here are all stocks and mostly US‑centric, shifting weights among them can only fine‑tune that trade‑off, not transform it into a low‑volatility solution. Small tweaks, like adjusting the growth‑heavy slice or the small cap value tilt, might slightly improve efficiency, but they won’t remove the fundamental equity‑driven risk that defines this overall setup.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.60%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
  • SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.19%

The overall dividend yield of around 1.2% is modest, which is totally normal for a growth‑oriented stock portfolio. Dividend yield is simply the cash income you receive each year as a percentage of your investment. The international fund and the small cap value ETF contribute more income, while the growth‑heavy index fund pays less. This setup works best for someone who’s focused on total return—price gains plus dividends—rather than using the portfolio as a primary income source. Reinvesting dividends automatically can meaningfully boost long‑term compounding, especially in tax‑advantaged accounts where those reinvested payouts are not immediately taxed.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 ETF 0.02%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.07%

The overall cost level looks excellent, with a blended expense ratio of roughly 0.07%. That means only 7 cents per year are paid in fund fees for every $100 invested, which is impressively low and a real long‑term advantage. Expense ratios act like a small leak in a bucket; the smaller the leak, the more water (returns) stays in over time. Most holdings are ultra‑low‑cost index funds, with just one slightly higher‑cost small cap value fund that still looks reasonable for its niche. This fee structure is very much in line with best practices and supports better net outcomes compared with higher‑cost active strategies.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey