Growth focused portfolio with strong us tilt and factor and dividend tilts at low cost

Report created on Dec 28, 2025

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is a simple four ETF mix with 99% in stocks and about 1% in cash, tilted toward growth. Two broad US equity funds plus a US dividend ETF and an international fund give you broad coverage with some tilts toward momentum and income. Compared with typical “growth” benchmarks, this setup is slightly more aggressive because it has almost no bonds. That matters because stocks can swing a lot in the short term, even if they tend to reward patience over long horizons. If short‑term drops would be stressful, gradually adding a small stabilizing sleeve (like cash-like or lower‑volatility assets) could make the ride smoother while keeping the core structure intact.

Growth Info

Historically, this mix shows a very strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.17%. CAGR is basically the “average speed” of growth per year, smoothing out all the bumps. A hypothetical $10,000 starting amount would look like roughly $49,000 after 10 years at that rate, though real life is rarely that smooth. The max drawdown of about ‑33% is meaningful but not extreme for an equity‑heavy, growth‑oriented mix and is broadly in line with stock market history. This suggests the risk level matches the profile score of 5/7. Still, past returns come from a specific period, so it’s worth expecting a more modest long‑term pace and preparing mentally for similar or worse drawdowns.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs 1,000 simulated futures based on historical behavior and randomness, shows a very wide range of possible outcomes. A 5th percentile ending value of about 123% means even in weaker scenarios the portfolio still grows somewhat, while the median scenario above 700% illustrates how powerful compounding can be over long horizons. An annualized return of 18.11% across simulations is impressive but likely reflects a strong historical window. Monte Carlo is a “what if” tool, not a promise, since future markets can behave differently. Using these projections, you might sanity‑check savings rates, retirement age, or big future spending plans rather than counting on the absolute numbers.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Cash
    1%

The asset class split is extremely straightforward: essentially all equities with a tiny 1% cash buffer. This is cleaner than many portfolios stuffed with overlapping products and still qualifies as broadly diversified across thousands of stocks. Compared with many balanced benchmarks that mix in bonds, this is clearly on the aggressive side. The benefit is higher expected growth over decades; the trade‑off is bigger swings, especially during recessions or rate shocks. For someone with a long horizon and stable income, this is totally reasonable. If future goals shift toward capital preservation or near‑term withdrawals, phasing in even a modest defensive sleeve could better line up asset mix with real‑world cash needs.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    26%
  • Financials
    16%
  • Industrials
    11%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Health Care
    9%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    8%
  • Energy
    6%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is nicely spread out: heavy but not extreme in technology, then healthy weights in financials, industrials, communication services, healthcare, and both consumer sectors. This lines up well with major equity benchmarks and is a strong indicator of real diversification rather than a hidden bet on any single theme. A tilt toward tech and growthier areas is normal when using broad US indexes plus a momentum fund; the upside is strong participation in innovation, but these areas can react more sharply to interest‑rate changes or risk‑off periods. Leaving the core diversified is a solid choice; any future tweaks could simply adjust how pronounced that growth tilt is, rather than rebuilding everything.

Regions Info

  • North America
    81%
  • Europe Developed
    8%
  • Asia Emerging
    3%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geographically, there’s a clear US tilt: about 81% in North America with the rest split across developed Europe, Japan, other developed Asia, and small slices of emerging markets. This is very typical for US‑based investors and has been rewarding over the last decade given US market leadership. The international allocation around 20% adds useful diversification, especially if non‑US markets eventually have their own strong cycles. However, it’s still less global than a truly world‑market‑weighted portfolio. That’s not automatically a problem; it just means results will track US fortunes quite closely. If you want to reduce “home country” risk over time, slowly nudging the international slice higher would be a straightforward lever.

Market capitalization Info

  • Large-cap
    40%
  • Mega-cap
    34%
  • Mid-cap
    20%
  • Small-cap
    4%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

The spread across market capitalization is solid: roughly two‑thirds in mega and big companies, with meaningful exposure to mid caps and smaller positions in small and micro caps. This pattern is very close to broad market benchmarks and helps balance stability and growth. Larger companies usually bring more predictable earnings and deeper liquidity, which can feel steadier. Smaller companies can be bumpier but sometimes offer higher long‑term growth potential. Having small and micro caps at single‑digit percentages keeps their volatility from dominating overall behavior. If future risk tolerance changed, adjusting the share of the broad total market funds (which hold more smaller names) would be a simple way to dial risk up or down.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk–return basis, this mix already sits in a pretty efficient spot for a stock‑heavy portfolio. The idea of the Efficient Frontier is finding the best possible balance of expected return for a given level of volatility, using only the current ingredients and just changing their weights. Within these four ETFs, slight shifts between the momentum, total market, dividend, and international slices could tweak the position—perhaps trading a bit of return potential for a touch less volatility, or vice versa. “Efficiency” here doesn’t mean perfect diversification or meeting every personal goal; it only speaks to how well the portfolio converts risk into expected return given the current building blocks.

Dividends Info

  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.80%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.70%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 3.20%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.94%

The overall yield of about 1.94% reflects a blend of high‑dividend holdings and lower‑yield growth funds. The Schwab dividend ETF and the international fund both provide meaningful income streams, while the momentum and total market ETFs are more growth‑oriented and pay less. Dividends can be handy for investors who like a steady cash flow or want to reinvest automatically to boost compounding. For a growth‑focused strategy, this balance is healthy: you’re not over‑sacrificing growth potential just to chase yield, but you still collect some ongoing income. Over time, reinvested dividends can be a surprisingly large part of total return, even when they don’t look huge in any single year.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.13%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.07%

The cost side is a real strength. With individual expense ratios from 0.03% to 0.13% and a blended TER around 0.07%, this is impressively low. Costs are like a slow leak in a tire: you barely notice them each year, but they add up massively over decades. Compared to many actively managed or more complex products, this structure keeps more of the market’s return in your pocket. The fact that the portfolio achieves broad global exposure, factor tilts, and dividends at such a low fee level is a big plus. Ongoing maintenance can mostly focus on staying in these cost ranges and avoiding the temptation of expensive, trendy add‑ons.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey