Hyperactive growth rocket strapped entirely to semiconductors tech darlings and vibes not diversification
Report created on May 11, 2026Risk profile
5/7
Diversification profile
3/5
Positions
-
SM VanEck Semiconductor ETF
SMH - US92189F6768 28.90% -
VO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
VOO - US9229083632 26.50% -
QQ Invesco QQQ Trust
QQQ - US46090E1038 24.70% -
RK Rocket Lab USA Inc.
RKLB - US7731211089 10.10% -
VX Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
VXUS - US9219097683 9.80%
This portfolio is basically three big growth index wrappers plus one space SPAC refugee and a token “international” garnish. Almost 80% sits in a tech-heavy triangle of semis, the S&P 500, and a Nasdaq clone, with Rocket Lab as the poster child for “I’d like some extra volatility please.” Diversification score 3/5 is generous; this is more like three flavors of the same ice cream and one bottle rocket. Structurally it’s simple, but simple here means heavily concentrated in one growth style, one region, and a narrow group of underlying giants whose names repeat everywhere. It behaves less like a portfolio and more like a thematic tech bet with a diplomatic passport stamp from “Rest of World.”
Growth
Historically, the thing has ripped: $1,000 turning into $4,131 with a 29.84% CAGR is cartoonish outperformance versus both US and global markets. The price for that thrill ride: a near -39% max drawdown and a 26‑month round trip from peak to full recovery. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is basically “average speed over the road trip”; here the speed was crazy, but so were the potholes. Also, 90% of returns came from just 30 days — this is a “miss a handful of good days, ruin the story” setup. Past data helps frame the behavior, but like yesterday’s weather, it doesn’t guarantee tomorrow’s storm pattern.
Projection
The Monte Carlo simulation takes this history, shakes it up, and re-rolls it 1,000 times to see a range of futures. Median outcome of $2,849 after 15 years sounds decent, but that’s only about an 8.16% annualized return — way tamer than the backward-looking 29.84% fantasy. The “possible” range from about $987 to $7,637 basically says anything from “flatlining for 15 years” to “lottery ticket” is on the table. Simulations are just math remixing old volatility, not a crystal ball. The key message: the future for this kind of high-octane portfolio is wide, messy, and absolutely not guaranteed to repeat its highlight reel.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Asset class “diversification” here is easy to summarize: 100% stocks, 0% everything else. It’s the equity equivalent of a diet that’s only energy drinks. No bonds, no real assets, no cash ballast in the structure — just full exposure to market mood swings. Being all-equity isn’t inherently bad, but it does mean when stocks throw a tantrum, there’s nothing in the mix designed to stay calm and offset the damage. Asset classes are the broad levers that shape how a portfolio behaves across different environments; this setup chooses the lever marked “max growth and max drama,” and breaks the others off for weight savings.
Sectors
- Technology 53%
- Industrials 15%
- Telecommunications 7%
- Consumer Discretionary 7%
- Financials 5%
- Health Care 4%
- Consumer Staples 4%
- Energy 2%
- Basic Materials 2%
- Utilities 1%
- Real Estate 1%
Sector breakdown screams tech obsession: 53% in technology, plus another big chunk in industrials that is partially space/industrial-adjacent, with everything else showing up as tiny side characters. This is less “balanced economic exposure” and more “betting on the digital and chip-powered future, and not much else.” Sector concentration matters because when one area of the economy hits a rough patch, a diversified portfolio can lean on others; here, if tech and related growth stories go cold, there isn’t a deep bench of boring, defensive sectors to quietly keep the lights on. The portfolio’s sector strategy is basically “in tech we trust, the rest can vibe in the background.”
Regions
- North America 86%
- Europe Developed 6%
- Asia Developed 5%
- Japan 2%
- Asia Emerging 1%
Geographically, this is America-first with a side salad: 86% in North America, a sprinkle of Europe and developed Asia, and almost nothing in emerging markets. For a “total international” ETF sitting at nearly 10%, its impact is mostly cosmetic — like putting a world map poster in a windowless room and calling it global. Geography matters because different regions hit cycles, currencies, and political messes at different times. This mix says “I believe the US growth story and I’m mildly aware other countries exist.” It’s not necessarily broken, but it’s definitely not taking the global diversification menu seriously.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 45%
- Large-cap 43%
- Mid-cap 10%
- Small-cap 1%
The market cap breakdown is hilariously on-brand: about 88% in mega and large caps, with mid caps getting a small nod and small caps basically treated like an urban legend. You’re not hunting hidden gems; you’re backing the stadium headliners and then doubling down on them through overlapping ETFs. Market cap spread is one of the main ways to tune risk and potential upside; this portfolio opts for size and liquidity over breadth. That can be fine, but it also means the fate of returns is tightly linked to how a small club of mega-cap names behaves, rather than a broad ecosystem of companies at different stages.
True holdings
-
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 9.04%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AV Broadcom Inc 3.64%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AA Apple Inc 3.53%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
TS Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 2.98%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AM Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.70%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 2.61%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 2.50%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
IN Intel Corporation 2.21%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 2.18%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco QQQ Trust
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Top 10 total 41.48%
The look-through holdings scream overlap. NVIDIA at 9%, Broadcom, TSMC, AMD, Micron, Intel — it’s basically the semiconductor Avengers showing up in multiple funds. Apple, Microsoft, Amazon tag along from the usual big-index suspects. When the same names appear across ETFs, the portfolio ends up more concentrated than the surface weights suggest; it’s like thinking you ordered three different dishes and realizing they’re all variations of chicken. Overlap is understated because only top-10 ETF holdings are counted, so the real concentration may be even heavier. Hidden concentration means one bad earnings season from a few giants can smack the whole portfolio at once.
Factors
Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.
Factor-wise, this thing is leaning hard into momentum with low value and low yield, plus not-exactly-chill volatility. Factors are the hidden ingredients — value, size, momentum, quality, yield, low vol — that explain why returns behave the way they do. High momentum plus low value is classic “hot and expensive,” which can look brilliant in uptrends and very dumb when the music stops. Low yield and low low-vol say this portfolio doesn’t care about steady income or smooth rides; it wants what’s working now. That’s like choosing a car based only on horsepower and ignoring brakes and suspension quality — fun, until the road curves.
Risk contribution
-
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Weight: 28.90% 37.1% -
Rocket Lab USA Inc.
Weight: 10.10% 21.4% -
Invesco QQQ Trust
Weight: 24.70% 20.6% -
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Weight: 26.50% 16.0% -
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 9.80% 4.9%
Risk contribution exposes who’s actually driving the chaos, and it’s not subtle. Semis at 29% weight delivering 37% of total risk is already loud, but Rocket Lab is the real drama queen: 10% weight, 21% of portfolio risk, more than double its proportion. That’s a smallish position throwing a very big tantrum. Risk/weight above 2 means it’s punching far above its size in volatility terms. The top three holdings delivering over 79% of total risk confirms this is a three-and-a-half-engine rocket; everything else is decorative fins. When a few positions dominate risk, the portfolio’s stability is hostage to their mood swings.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk/return chart, the current portfolio sits below its own efficient frontier, leaving about 1.18 percentage points of potential return on the table at this risk level. The efficient frontier is the curve showing the best return you could get for each risk level using just the existing ingredients, rearranged. Being below it means the same holdings could be weighted more intelligently to improve the tradeoff. The Sharpe ratio of 0.99 versus the 1.2 of the optimal mix is like running a fast car with badly balanced tires — it still moves, but not as smoothly or efficiently as it could, given the parts you already own.
Dividends
- Invesco QQQ Trust 0.40%
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.20%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
- Weighted yield (per year) 0.71%
Dividend yield at 0.71% is basically “we pay you in vibes.” QQQ and the semiconductor ETF hardly bother, the S&P 500 adds a small bump, and the international fund does the actual heavy lifting. Dividends can act like a slow drip of cash flow that cushions returns when prices stall, but this portfolio treats income as a side quest, not the main game. It’s unapologetically growth-first. That’s fine if the companies keep compounding and reinvesting wisely; less fine if price gains pause and there’s no meaningful cash coming in while you wait. Call it the “live by capital gains, die by capital gains” setup.
Ongoing product costs
- Invesco QQQ Trust 0.20%
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.16%
Costs are the one fully clean part of this story. A 0.16% total TER is impressively low for a portfolio this spicy — like ordering the fancy-tasting menu and then being told the cover charge is basically pocket change. The S&P and international ETFs are dirt cheap, QQQ is reasonable, and only the semiconductor ETF looks slightly pricey, but even that isn’t offensive in context. Fees compound quietly over time, so keeping them low is one of the few guaranteed wins in investing. Here, at least, the portfolio isn’t lighting money on fire just to own recognizable tickers. You actually clicked the cheap buttons on purpose.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey