Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

A growth focused portfolio with heavy technology tilt and very strong long term return potential

Report created on Aug 8, 2024

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is almost entirely made up of stock ETFs, with a big 41% tilt toward a technology fund and the rest spread across broad US, international, growth, and small cap ETFs. Compared with a typical global “growth” benchmark, this setup is more aggressive and more tech-heavy. That matters because the mix of funds is what really drives risk and return over time, much more than individual security choices. For someone happy with higher ups and downs, this structure is broadly on point, but trimming overlapping funds and slightly reducing the single‑sector tilt could make the overall mix cleaner while still keeping a strong growth profile.

Growth Info

Historically, this mix has delivered a very strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 18%. In plain terms, turning $10,000 into roughly $51,000 over ten years would be in that ballpark, though that’s just an illustration. The worst peak‑to‑trough drop (max drawdown) of about –33% shows that sharp pullbacks are very possible, especially with a tech bias. Versus broad equity benchmarks, this return profile looks excellent but comes with above‑average volatility. It’s important to remember that past performance is not a promise; markets change, leadership rotates, and periods of underperformance can follow very strong runs.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo simulation ran 1,000 potential future paths using historical return and volatility patterns, which is like stress‑testing the portfolio in many “what if” worlds. The median outcome suggests an investment could grow roughly 6–7x over the chosen horizon, while even the lower 5th percentile ends slightly above break‑even. An annualized simulated return near 17–18% is extremely strong, but it’s driven by a historically great period for US and tech assets. Simulations are only as good as their inputs, so they can’t fully capture regime shifts, valuation changes, or unexpected crises. Treat these numbers as a rough range, not a forecast.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Cash
    1%

Asset‑class exposure is very straightforward: about 99% stocks and 1% cash. That lines up with an aggressive growth style and is similar to a high‑equity benchmark, but with even less ballast from bonds or alternatives. Equities historically offer higher long‑term returns, yet they also drop more in bear markets. For someone early in their investing journey with a long horizon, this stock‑heavy approach can be perfectly sensible. However, it’s worth thinking about whether adding a small slice of defensive assets in another account or later in life could help smooth the ride without completely dulling the growth engine.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    58%
  • Financials
    9%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    7%
  • Industrials
    6%
  • Telecommunications
    6%
  • Health Care
    6%
  • Consumer Staples
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Energy
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%
  • Utilities
    1%

Sector allocation is dominated by technology at 58%, far above typical broad market benchmarks where tech is big but not this concentrated. Other sectors like financials, consumer areas, industrials, communication services, and healthcare are present but much smaller. This tech tilt has been a huge tailwind in recent years, especially during periods of strong innovation and low interest rates. The flip side is that tech‑heavy portfolios can be more sensitive when rates rise, regulations tighten, or sentiment turns against high‑growth companies. Keeping the tilt intentional and periodically checking whether it’s still aligned with comfort levels is a smart ongoing habit.

Regions Info

  • North America
    83%
  • Europe Developed
    7%
  • Asia Emerging
    3%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geographically, about 83% is in North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, developed Asia, and a modest amount in emerging regions. This is somewhat more US‑tilted than a typical global equity benchmark, but still shows good international representation through the international ETF. Heavy US exposure has helped over the last decade, since US markets have outperformed many peers. However, different regions take turns leading over long cycles. Maintaining at least some non‑US allocation, as this setup already does, helps reduce the risk that a single country’s economic or policy issues dominate overall returns.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    47%
  • Large-cap
    26%
  • Mid-cap
    14%
  • Small-cap
    9%
  • Micro-cap
    4%

By market capitalization, the portfolio leans toward mega and large companies (around 73% combined), with smaller slices in mid, small, and micro caps. That’s broadly in line with many core benchmarks, which are naturally dominated by larger firms, but the presence of small‑cap exposure adds useful diversification and growth potential. Large companies tend to be more stable and liquid, while smaller ones can be more volatile but offer higher upside in certain cycles. This blend is quite healthy overall. If volatility ever feels too high, reducing smaller‑cap exposure is one simple lever, while those seeking extra punch might lean more into the smaller brackets.

Redundant positions Info

  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    High correlation

The main US growth and tech funds are highly correlated, meaning they tend to move in the same direction at similar times. Correlation is basically the “togetherness” of returns; high correlation limits how much diversification you actually get from holding multiple positions. Here, the tech ETF, the broad US ETF, and the large‑cap growth ETF overlap heavily in their underlying holdings and behavior. This doesn’t make them bad choices, but it can mean redundant exposure. Simplifying by reducing overlapping funds and focusing on a leaner core could keep the same general risk level while making it easier to monitor and rebalance.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

From a risk‑return optimization angle, this mix likely sits above average on the Efficient Frontier for equity‑only portfolios. The Efficient Frontier is the set of allocations that give the best possible return for a given level of volatility using the existing building blocks. Because several funds are highly correlated and overlap in holdings, there’s probably room to shift weights among them to achieve a similar expected return with slightly lower volatility. Any optimization would be about fine‑tuning the balance between the tech‑heavy pieces, the broad US exposure, and international stocks, not about abandoning the overall growth‑first philosophy that clearly underpins this structure.

Dividends Info

  • Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF 1.20%
  • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF 1.10%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.00%

The total dividend yield of around 1% is on the low side, which fits a growth‑oriented, tech‑tilted portfolio. Dividend yield is the annual cash payout as a percentage of the investment, similar to “interest” from stocks. Many growth and tech companies reinvest earnings instead of paying big dividends, aiming for price appreciation instead of income. The international fund provides the highest yield in the mix, adding a small income component. This setup is well aligned with investors who care more about long‑term growth than regular cash flow. Anyone needing near‑term income would likely need other accounts with higher‑yielding holdings.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF 0.04%
  • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF 0.03%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.06%

Costs are impressively low, with a total expense ratio (TER) around 0.06%. TER is the annual fee charged by funds, taken out of returns behind the scenes. Over decades, even small differences in fees compound significantly, so starting from a very low base is a big structural advantage. This fee level is better than many actively managed options and aligns closely with best practices for cost‑conscious investing. Keeping funds simple, broad, and low‑cost is one of the few things investors can control with high confidence, and this setup already does a great job on that front. No major tweaks needed here.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey