This portfolio has only about 1.1 years of historical data, based on the youngest asset in the portfolio. Some metrics, projections, and AI insights may be less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.
Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

Momentum focused global equity portfolio with strong recent returns and concentrated technology exposure

Report created on May 4, 2026

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is a concentrated, all‑equity mix of seven ETFs, each holding between about 8% and 17%. Most positions follow explicit momentum or focused equity strategies, with one small‑cap value fund and one emerging‑markets fund rounding things out. That structure creates a clear tilt toward more active, higher‑octane equity exposures rather than broad, slow‑moving index trackers. Because everything here is stock‑based, the portfolio’s ups and downs are closely tied to global equity markets rather than bonds or cash. With only about 1.1 years of history, any impressions about long‑term behavior are tentative, but the design already points toward a growth‑oriented, return‑seeking approach rather than capital preservation.

Growth Info

Over the short 1.1‑year window, the portfolio turned $1,000 into about $1,612, a very strong result versus both US and global market benchmarks. Its compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 54.4% far exceeds the roughly 25–26% from the benchmarks in this same period. CAGR is like average speed on a road trip — it smooths the ride into one yearly growth number. The max drawdown of about –15% was only slightly deeper than the benchmarks’ –13% range, showing strong returns came with only modestly higher downside so far. However, this period is short and unusually favorable for momentum and semiconductors, so these numbers should be seen as a snapshot, not a reliable long‑term pattern.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection uses the short historical record to simulate many possible 15‑year paths, producing a range of potential outcomes. Monte Carlo is basically “what‑if” math: it shakes the historical returns and volatility in many random combinations to see how $1,000 might grow. The median outcome of about $2,693 and an average simulated annual return of 8.02% land in a reasonable equity‑like range. Still, because the input data covers only 1.1 years — a very strong phase for this style — the model may be leaning on conditions that won’t repeat. These projections are best understood as rough, educational scenarios, not forecasts or promises about what will actually happen.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All of this portfolio sits in stocks, with 0% in bonds, cash, or alternatives. From an asset‑class point of view, that means the main diversification is within equities rather than across fundamentally different types of assets. In general, adding other asset classes can smooth the ride because they often behave differently from stocks in stressful periods. Here, the choice to be 100% equity concentrates both growth potential and market sensitivity in a single bucket. The benchmarks used for comparison are also equity‑focused, so versus those references this all‑stock allocation is aligned, but compared with more mixed stock‑bond blends it would usually feel more volatile over a full cycle.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    36%
  • Industrials
    17%
  • Financials
    15%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    7%
  • Energy
    7%
  • Basic Materials
    5%
  • Telecommunications
    4%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Health Care
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector‑wise, technology stands out at 36% of equity exposure, noticeably above broad global equity benchmarks. Industrial and financial stocks together add another 32%, with the rest spread across consumer, energy, materials, telecom, staples, health care, utilities, and real estate in smaller slices. A heavy technology tilt can amplify returns when innovation‑driven companies are leading the market, especially during growth‑friendly or low‑rate environments. The flip side is that this sector has historically seen sharper swings when sentiment turns or when interest rates rise. On the positive side, having meaningful—if smaller—exposure across many non‑tech sectors does provide some internal diversification within the equity bucket.

Regions Info

  • North America
    72%
  • Europe Developed
    10%
  • Asia Developed
    9%
  • Japan
    4%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Latin America
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geographically, about 72% of the portfolio is in North America, with the remainder spread across developed Europe, developed Asia (including Japan), and smaller allocations to emerging regions like Asia, Latin America, and Africa/Middle East. That North American tilt is higher than many global market benchmarks, which usually have a somewhat lower US share. A strong home‑region weighting often tracks recent leadership but can create concentration in one currency, regulatory system, and economic cycle. The presence of international developed and emerging‑markets momentum and focused strategies broadens the opportunity set, yet the portfolio’s overall behavior is still likely to be most influenced by North American equity conditions.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    32%
  • Large-cap
    28%
  • Mid-cap
    18%
  • Small-cap
    14%
  • Micro-cap
    8%

The market‑cap mix leans toward larger companies: around 60% in mega‑ and large‑caps, with the rest in mid, small, and a notable 8% in micro‑caps. Market capitalization is just company size by stock market value. Bigger firms tend to have more established businesses and, historically, somewhat lower volatility, while smaller names often move more dramatically, both up and down. The inclusion of small‑ and micro‑caps adds an extra layer of potential return and risk, especially when combined with momentum and value styles. This blend creates a size profile that is more diversified than pure large‑cap, but not strongly tilted toward smaller companies overall.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    4.32%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
  • Broadcom Inc
    2.65%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
  • Micron Technology Inc
    2.00%
    Part of fund(s):
    • American Century ETF Trust
    • American Century ETF Trust - Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
    1.74%
    Part of fund(s):
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
  • Advanced Micro Devices Inc
    1.56%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
  • Intel Corporation
    1.17%
    Part of fund(s):
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
  • SK Square Co Ltd
    1.11%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Macquarie Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
    1.04%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Macquarie Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
  • Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
    0.95%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Macquarie Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    0.91%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
  • Top 10 total 17.45%

Looking through ETF top‑10 holdings, several semiconductor and mega‑cap tech names appear across multiple funds. NVIDIA alone represents about 4.3% of the portfolio, with Broadcom, Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor, AMD, and Intel adding further concentration to the chip and hardware ecosystem. Overlap in these names means the portfolio is more exposed to the fortunes of a relatively small group of companies than the fund count suggests. It’s worth noting this overlap may be understated because only top‑10 holdings are included, and more exposure could sit in lower‑ranked positions. This kind of “hidden” concentration can be a powerful return driver when the theme is working, but it also ties the portfolio more closely to that specific industry’s cycles.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 33%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
Very low
Data availability: 100%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
High
Data availability: 50%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
No data
Data availability: 0%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 100%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 67%

Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.

Factor exposure shows a strong tilt toward momentum at 75%, with very low size exposure at 19% and neutral readings for value, yield, and low volatility. Factors are like underlying “personality traits” of stocks that research links to long‑term return patterns. A high momentum tilt means the portfolio systematically favors stocks that have been recent winners. That can boost performance in trending markets but may see sharper setbacks when trends reverse quickly. The very low size score indicates a tilt away from smaller‑size factor exposure relative to a neutral market baseline, despite some small‑ and micro‑cap holdings in the mix. With limited history, these factor readings are informative but still preliminary.

Risk contribution Info

  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
    Weight: 16.60%
    26.0%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    Weight: 16.70%
    16.3%
  • MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
    Weight: 16.70%
    14.6%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
    Weight: 16.70%
    14.5%
  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
    Weight: 16.70%
    12.8%
  • Top 5 risk contribution 84.2%

Risk contribution shows that the VanEck Semiconductor ETF, at 16.6% weight, generates about 26% of overall portfolio risk — a risk/weight ratio of 1.56. Risk contribution measures how much each position drives total volatility, which can differ from its simple weight. Here, the top three holdings by risk add up to nearly 57% of the portfolio’s total risk, even though they are roughly half the weight. This tells us that certain focused and sector‑heavy funds punch above their size in influencing day‑to‑day swings. Position sizing and underlying volatility together explain this pattern, and it reinforces how important that semiconductor and momentum exposure is for the portfolio’s overall behavior.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

The risk‑return chart shows the current portfolio sitting below the efficient frontier, with a Sharpe ratio of 1.9 versus 2.46 for the optimal mix of the same holdings. The Sharpe ratio compares excess return to volatility — like measuring how much “reward” you’re getting per unit of “bumpiness.” Being about 5.3 percentage points below the frontier at the current risk level suggests that, historically, different weightings of these same ETFs could have delivered better risk‑adjusted returns without adding new assets. The minimum‑variance mix offers lower volatility and a still‑strong Sharpe of 1.7. With such a short and favorable history, these optimization results are best seen as a structural hint rather than a fixed roadmap.

Dividends Info

  • American Century ETF Trust 1.90%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.30%
  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 3.60%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.20%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.80%
  • Macquarie Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF 2.00%
  • MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF 0.20%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.34%

The overall dividend yield of the portfolio is about 1.34%, with individual ETF yields ranging from around 0.2% to 3.6%. Dividends are the cash payouts companies make from profits, and over long periods they can meaningfully contribute to total return, especially when reinvested. Here, the yield is on the lower side compared with many broad equity income strategies, which fits with the portfolio’s growth‑ and momentum‑oriented design. Some international and emerging‑markets holdings provide higher yields, adding a modest income component. Given the short performance window, it’s still early to draw firm conclusions about how stable these dividends will be across different market environments.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • American Century ETF Trust 0.26%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 0.25%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.13%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.18%

Estimated total ongoing fund costs (TER) come to about 0.18% per year, which is low for a portfolio using specialized factor and thematic ETFs. TER, or Total Expense Ratio, is the annual fee charged by each fund, taken out of returns behind the scenes. Over long periods, even small fee differences compound, so keeping this figure modest is generally helpful for net performance. Relative to many active or niche strategies that can charge significantly more, these costs are impressively contained. With only 1.1 years of history, it’s hard to isolate exactly how much fees have mattered so far, but structurally this cost profile is a clear strength of the portfolio.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey