A cautious income oriented portfolio with heavy US equity tilt and large cash buffer

Report created on Nov 4, 2024

Risk profile Info

3/7
Cautious
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The portfolio is concentrated in four ETFs with about 34.6% in the S&P 500 ETF 32.8% in a 0–3 month Treasury ETF 21.3% in a total US market ETF and 11.4% in a total international ETF. Asset-wise it reads as roughly two thirds equity and about one third cash with minimal bonds. Compared with a balanced benchmark this is equity heavy in large caps but unusually high in ultra short duration cash. The overlap between the S&P 500 ETF and the total US market ETF creates redundancy. Recommendation: simplify overlapping exposures and rebalance the cash buffer into diversified, complementary assets.

Growth Info

Using a hypothetical $10,000 starting point the reported CAGR of 12.27% implies considerable historical growth for the period measured — roughly a threefold increase over ten years if that pace held. The max drawdown of −19.18% indicates the worst peak-to-trough loss experienced, so even a cautious profile saw meaningful declines. Only 32 days made up 90% of returns which shows return concentration from a few strong trading days. Recommendation: expect volatility spikes even with a cautious label and keep a plan for rebalancing and disciplined contributions to smooth results over time.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis used 1,000 simulations to project possible future outcomes by sampling from historical return patterns and volatility assumptions. It shows a wide spread: the 5th percentile ended near 119% of the start while the median was about 447% and the 67th near 599%, with 999 of 1,000 sims positive. Annualized simulated return was 13.7%. Monte Carlo is useful for planning because it reveals a range not a guarantee, but it depends on historical inputs and assumed correlations. Recommendation: use simulations for scenario planning and consider conservative stress tests for downside scenarios.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    67%
  • Cash
    32%
  • Bonds
    1%

The allocation reads as Stock 67% Cash 32% and Bond 1% which is atypical for a “cautious” profile that usually has more fixed income instead of cash. Cash here provides liquidity and low volatility but drags long-term returns and may miss income opportunities. Bonds normally add duration and income diversification; the near-zero bond weight limits that cushion. Recommendation: consider reallocating a portion of the cash into diversified short to intermediate duration taxable or municipal bonds or into conservative income generating instruments to balance liquidity and yield.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    22%
  • Financials
    10%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    7%
  • Telecommunications
    6%
  • Industrials
    6%
  • Health Care
    6%
  • Consumer Staples
    3%
  • Energy
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector weights show a notable technology tilt at 22% with financials 10% and a spread across consumer cyclical communication industrials and healthcare. This resembles broad market exposure but with a slightly higher tech share which can increase return volatility particularly when interest rates rise. Having exposure across eight sectors is a positive sign for diversification yet the tech concentration is a key concentration risk. Recommendation: monitor sector drift periodically and if the aim is steadier returns trim sector overweights in favor of underrepresented defensive sectors or noncorrelated assets.

Regions Info

  • North America
    57%
  • Europe Developed
    4%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Japan
    2%
  • Asia Developed
    1%
  • Australasia
    1%

Geographic allocation is heavily North America at 57% with roughly 11–12% in total international markets and minimal emerging market exposure. Compared with global market-cap benchmarks this is a domestic biased portfolio which reduces currency and regional diversification benefits. Overweighting the home market can be comfortable but may increase vulnerability to country specific downturns or policy shocks. Recommendation: consider a modest increase to developed and emerging international exposures to capture different growth drivers and reduce single-country concentration risk.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    30%
  • Large-cap
    22%
  • Mid-cap
    12%
  • Small-cap
    2%

Market cap distribution is skewed to large caps with Mega at 30% Big 22% Medium 12% Small 2% which means roughly half the equity sleeve sits in the largest firms. Large caps offer relative stability and often dividends but can limit long-term growth potential versus mid and small caps. Small cap exposure is quite low which reduces exposure to higher growth but more volatile segments. Recommendation: if the objective includes higher long-term growth consider a gradual tilt toward mid-cap exposure while being mindful of added volatility for a cautious profile.

Redundant positions Info

  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    High correlation

The two US equity ETFs are highlighted as highly correlated which means they move together and provide little diversification benefit. Correlation measures how assets move in relation to one another where 1.0 is perfect co-movement; high correlation reduces the ability to smooth returns in downturns. This overlap increases concentration risk and complicates rebalancing. Recommendation: remove or reduce redundant holdings and replace with assets that have lower correlation to the US large cap market such as international equities or high quality bonds to improve true diversification.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Efficient Frontier optimization looks for allocations among the current assets that give the best expected return for a given level of risk based strictly on those assets and historical inputs. The analysis suggests an optimal portfolio with expected return 2.90% at risk level 0.25% using only these ETFs and allocation shifts. Efficiency here means the best risk return trade-off given the available ingredients not necessarily the best diversified or income solution. Recommendation: before optimization remove redundant highly correlated holdings and decide the primary objective — capital preservation income or growth — then run optimization constrained to those goals and realistic assumptions.

Dividends Info

  • iShares® 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF 4.10%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 2.26%

The portfolio shows a blended yield around 2.26% with the cash/short Treasury ETF showing 4.10% yield and US equity ETFs around 1.1% each while the international ETF yields about 2.7%. Dividends and short-term yields contribute to income which is useful for cautious investors who prioritize stability and cash flow. However dividend yield alone is not the only return driver and can be cyclical. Recommendation: define whether the goal is current income or total return and if income matters consider modestly increasing higher yielding but high quality income components while preserving capital.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • iShares® 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF 0.07%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.05%

Expense ratios are very low with the portfolio TER about 0.05% driven by broad Vanguard and iShares ETFs. Low costs are a solid alignment with best practices because expenses compound and reduce long-term returns. The current cost structure is commendable and supports better net compounding for investors. Recommendation: maintain low-cost ETFs but prioritize removing overlap and simplifying the lineup rather than chasing marginally lower fees; avoid frequent trading which can negate cost advantages.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey