A strongly factor tilted global equity portfolio with high growth orientation and disciplined low cost structure
Report created on Mar 17, 2026Risk profile
5/7
Diversification profile
3/5
Positions
-
VO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
VOO - US9229083632 65.00% -
AV Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
AVUV - US0250728773 15.00% -
AV Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF
AVDV - US0250728021 10.00% -
ID Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
IDMO - US46138E2220 10.00%
The structure is very clear: roughly two‑thirds in a broad large‑cap US index fund, with the rest split across small‑cap value and international momentum strategies. This creates a core‑satellite setup where the big core tracks a familiar index and the satellites tilt toward specific styles. That matters because it blends simplicity with targeted return drivers while still being easy to monitor. The core allocation is well-balanced and aligns closely with global standards for a growth profile. To keep this on track over time, it helps to define a target mix and periodically rebalance back to it, especially after strong rallies in either the large‑cap index or the small‑cap value sleeves.
Growth
Using a simple example, a 10,000 dollar starting amount growing at a 16.03% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) would have multiplied several times over a decade. CAGR measures the “average speed” of growth over many years, smoothing out the bumps. Compared with typical equity benchmarks, this figure is very strong and lines up with a growth‑oriented risk score. However, the portfolio also experienced a maximum drawdown of about ‑36%, meaning a large temporary drop from peak to trough. Past performance never guarantees future results, so it helps to mentally budget for similar large swings and ensure the time horizon and cash needs can comfortably ride out deep but normal equity downturns.
Projection
The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs 1,000 simulations using historical volatility and relationships between assets, shows a very wide range of possible outcomes. Monte Carlo is like replaying market history with slight variations to see many plausible futures. The median result turning 100 dollars into about 645 suggests strong potential upside, while the 5th percentile ending near 84 shows that losses or long flat periods are still possible. An annualized simulated return of around 17.6% is impressive but heavily dependent on the past environment. Because markets change, it is safer to treat these numbers as rough planning ranges rather than promises, and to stress‑test plans against lower return scenarios too.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
All investable assets sit in stocks, with no allocation to bonds, cash, or other defensive assets. That is consistent with a Profile_Growth label and explains both the strong return history and the sizeable drawdowns. A 100% equity stance is powerful for long horizons, but it can be emotionally tough during big market sell‑offs. This allocation is still considered moderately diversified because it spreads across many companies and strategies, yet it lacks diversification across asset classes. One way to pressure‑test this setup is to ask whether major life events or cash needs within the next 5–10 years would require a smoother ride, in which case adding even a small defensive sleeve could reduce overall volatility.
Sectors
- Technology 24%
- Financials 18%
- Industrials 12%
- Consumer Discretionary 11%
- Telecommunications 8%
- Health Care 7%
- Energy 6%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector allocation shows a healthy spread, with notable weights in technology, financial services, industrials, and consumer‑related areas, plus meaningful slices in energy, healthcare, and materials. This pattern is broadly similar to major global equity benchmarks, which is a strong indicator of diversification and lowers the risk of any single industry dominating outcomes. The sizable tech and communication exposure, driven by large US names, can amplify sensitivity to interest rates and innovation cycles. During periods when high‑growth companies fall out of favor, drawdowns may feel sharper. Regularly checking whether any one sector drifts far beyond its usual band, and rebalancing when it does, can help keep sector risk aligned with long‑term intentions.
Regions
- North America 83%
- Europe Developed 10%
- Japan 4%
- Australasia 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Asia Developed 1%
Geographic exposure is heavily centered on North America at about 83%, with the rest mostly in developed markets like Europe, Japan, and Australasia. This mirrors many US‑based equity benchmarks that are naturally home‑biased, and it has been beneficial over the last decade as US markets outperformed many peers. However, it also means portfolio results are tightly linked to the fortunes of one major economy and currency. Because different regions lead at different times, broader global exposure can smooth long‑term outcomes. It can help to occasionally revisit whether this US‑tilt is intentional and feels comfortable, or whether incremental increases to non‑US developed or other markets would better match desired global diversification.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 35%
- Large-cap 27%
- Mid-cap 18%
- Small-cap 12%
- Micro-cap 7%
The mix by company size is nicely tiered, with meaningful allocations across mega, big, medium, small, and even micro‑cap stocks. This is a deliberate departure from a pure large‑cap index and aligns with the strong size factor exposure. Smaller companies often carry higher risk and volatility but can offer higher long‑term return potential, especially when combined with a value tilt. This allocation is well-balanced and aligns closely with global standards for an equity investor seeking extra growth. Because smaller stocks can underperform for long stretches, it helps to view this tilt as a long‑horizon choice and to avoid reacting to multi‑year cycles where large caps may dominate headlines and short‑term performance.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 5.10%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AA Apple Inc 4.21%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 3.51%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 2.55%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 2.16%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.73%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.72%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 1.71%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
TS Tesla Inc 1.33%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
BR Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.97%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
- Top 10 total 24.97%
Looking through the ETFs into their largest holdings, there is a noticeable tilt toward mega‑cap names like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Broadcom, Meta, Tesla, and Berkshire Hathaway. These companies together make up a meaningful portion of total exposure, even though they are only held via funds. This mimics common broad‑market benchmarks, which are also dominated by similar giants, and helps explain some of the strong historical returns. Because only top‑10 ETF holdings are captured, actual diversification is somewhat understated here. It can still be useful to occasionally review whether the combined weight in these very large growth companies matches the desired risk profile, especially if they become even more dominant.
Factors
Factor exposure is one of the most distinctive features. There are strong tilts toward value and size, plus a notable low‑volatility lean and some momentum exposure. Factors are like underlying “personality traits” of stocks that research has linked to returns over decades. A heavy value and small‑cap tilt can boost expected return but may lag for years when growth or mega‑caps lead. The momentum and low‑volatility signals suggest some balance between chasing winners and dampening shocks. Signal coverage is only partly complete, so some readings are approximate. For this kind of factor‑rich portfolio, success depends on patience through factor droughts and comfort with returns that can differ significantly from broad market indexes.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Weight: 65.00% 64.4% -
Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
Weight: 15.00% 18.8% -
Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF
Weight: 10.00% 8.4% -
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
Weight: 10.00% 8.4%
Risk contribution shows how much each holding drives total volatility, which can differ from its simple weight. Here, the large US index fund contributes nearly the same share of risk as its 65% weight, while the US small‑cap value ETF contributes more risk (about 19%) than its 15% slice. The international small‑cap value and momentum funds contribute slightly less risk than their weights. This pattern is normal for a growth‑tilted portfolio and indicates that the top three positions account for over 90% of overall risk. Keeping an eye on whether one satellite fund’s risk swells disproportionately over time can help maintain the intended balance between core stability and factor tilts.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On a risk‑return chart, often called the Efficient Frontier, this portfolio likely sits toward the higher‑risk, higher‑return end among mixes of its existing funds. The Efficient Frontier represents the best possible trade‑off between volatility and expected return using only the current building blocks and different weightings. “Efficiency” here means getting the most return per unit of risk, not necessarily maximizing diversification or minimizing drawdowns. Given the strong factor tilts and all‑equity stance, small adjustments among the four funds could modestly change volatility or return expectations, but the overall profile would remain growth‑heavy. Reviewing whether the current spot on that curve still matches comfort with big swings can guide any future fine‑tuning.
Dividends
- Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF 3.00%
- Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.80%
- Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 3.70%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.66%
The overall dividend yield of about 1.66% is modest, which is typical for a growth‑oriented equity mix with strong factor tilts. Some underlying ETFs, especially the international small‑cap value and international momentum sleeves, offer higher yields around 3%–3.7%, but the large US core drags the blended yield lower. Dividends can provide a small cushion during flat or down markets and a source of cash flow without needing to sell shares. For an investor focused on total return, this level is perfectly reasonable. If future goals call for more income, it would be possible to gradually tilt toward higher‑yielding strategies while monitoring how that affects growth potential and tax efficiency.
Ongoing product costs
- Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF 0.36%
- Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
- Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 0.25%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.12%
The weighted total expense ratio of about 0.12% is impressively low, especially for a portfolio that uses specialized factor strategies alongside a broad index core. Costs matter because they are one of the few things investors can reliably control; lower fees leave more of the gross return in the account each year. Over long periods, even a small fee difference compounds into a substantial dollar amount. This cost structure is well-balanced and aligns closely with best practices for long‑term investing. To keep it that way, it helps to periodically check whether any new holdings or share classes would raise the blended cost noticeably without delivering clear, evidence‑based benefits.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey