A broadly diversified equity heavy portfolio with strong growth tilt and impressively low ongoing costs

Report created on Aug 11, 2024

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is built almost entirely from broad stock ETFs, with a 40% core total US fund, 20% in a growth-tilted Nasdaq tracker, 20% in a US dividend ETF, and 20% in a total international fund. That structure leans more toward growth than a typical “balanced” mix, which usually includes a noticeable slice of bonds. A concentrated equity mix matters because it raises long‑term return potential but also leaves the portfolio more exposed during big market drops. If the goal is to keep the “balanced” risk profile, shifting a small part into lower‑volatility assets could smooth the ride while keeping the overall logic of the current structure intact.

Growth Info

Historically, this mix shows a very strong 14% Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR). CAGR is like the average yearly speed of a road trip, smoothing out bumps to show how fast the portfolio has grown per year. A maximum drawdown of about ‑25% means that, at its worst point, the portfolio fell roughly a quarter from a prior peak, which is quite reasonable for an almost‑all‑stock allocation. Compared with typical broad equity benchmarks, this profile looks competitive and consistent with a growth‑tilted stance. It’s important to remember that past results, even very strong ones, don’t guarantee future returns, especially if markets or interest rates shift meaningfully.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis uses 1,000 simulations based on historical return and volatility patterns to create many possible future paths. Think of it as “replaying history with random shuffles” to see a range of outcomes rather than a single forecast. A median (50th percentile) outcome around 480% and a 5th percentile near 95% show a favorable skew: many strong scenarios, but still some where returns are flat or modest. The annualized return across simulations at about 14.65% is in line with history, but this relies on past market behavior. Real‑world future conditions can differ, so it’s wise to treat these results as rough guidance, not a promise.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Cash
    1%

The allocation is 99% stocks and about 1% cash, with no material exposure to bonds or alternative assets. This is far more equity‑heavy than what many “balanced” reference portfolios use, where 40–60% bonds is common. A pure‑equity stance is powerful for long horizons because stocks historically outgrow inflation better than most assets, but the price is higher short‑term swings and sharper drawdowns. For investors wanting to keep volatility closer to a typical balanced profile, gradually adding a slice of defensive assets or a more stable income component can help, without needing to overhaul the existing broad‑equity framework that is already well‑diversified.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    30%
  • Financials
    12%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    11%
  • Health Care
    10%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Consumer Staples
    8%
  • Energy
    6%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is nicely spread, with technology around 30% and meaningful weights in financials, consumer cyclicals, healthcare, communication services, and industrials. This aligns well with many modern equity benchmarks, where tech and related areas naturally dominate due to their large company sizes. A tech tilt can boost growth but may feel bumpier when interest rates rise or during risk‑off periods. The positive news is that no single sector fully dominates, and even defensive sectors like consumer staples and utilities have representation. Keeping an eye on how much of the growth tilt is intentional versus accidental can help you decide whether to keep this tech‑heavy stance or slowly rebalance if volatility feels too high.

Regions Info

  • North America
    81%
  • Europe Developed
    8%
  • Asia Emerging
    3%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, about 81% sits in North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, other developed Asia, and small slices in emerging regions. This is somewhat more home‑biased than a pure global market‑cap benchmark, which usually holds closer to 55–65% in North America. A home tilt is common for US investors and has worked well over the past decade as US stocks outperformed many international markets. The positive alignment here is that you still hold a solid 20% international slice, which supports diversification. If you want to reduce reliance on the US economic cycle, modestly increasing non‑US exposure over time is one way to spread risk further.

Market capitalization Info

  • Large-cap
    37%
  • Mega-cap
    36%
  • Mid-cap
    19%
  • Small-cap
    5%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

Market‑cap exposure is anchored in mega and large companies, which together account for over 70%, with smaller allocations to mid, small, and micro caps. This structure looks very similar to broad market benchmarks, where big firms dominate total value. Large and mega caps tend to be more stable and liquid, which helps reduce single‑stock risk and trading frictions. The smaller but still meaningful exposure to mid and small caps adds a bit of extra growth potential and diversification. This blend is already well‑balanced, so any tweaks would mainly depend on how much additional volatility you’re willing to accept in exchange for possibly higher long‑term returns from smaller companies.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Risk‑return optimization using the Efficient Frontier looks at all your existing building blocks and asks: “Given these funds only, is there a mix that offers more expected return for the same volatility, or less volatility for the same return?” The Efficient Frontier isn’t about perfection; it’s about the most effective trade‑off between risk and reward, not necessarily about maximizing diversification or income. With your strong growth tilt and low costs, the portfolio already sits in a healthy part of the risk‑return spectrum. Slightly adjusting the weights between growth, dividend, and international components—or adding a small stabilizing sleeve—could nudge it closer to the most efficient point without changing the overall philosophy.

Dividends Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 2.80%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.64%

The overall dividend yield around 1.64% reflects a blend of a higher‑yield dividend ETF and lower‑yield growth‑oriented funds. Dividend yield is simply the cash paid out each year as a percentage of price, like rent from owning shares. The presence of a dedicated dividend ETF is a strong point, as it adds a more predictable income stream to an otherwise growth‑tilted equity portfolio. This setup suits someone focused on total return (growth plus income), not just maximum yield. If income needs rise later, raising the share of dividend‑oriented or income‑focused holdings could boost cash flow, though it might slightly lower pure capital‑growth potential.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.06%

The weighted ongoing fee (TER) of roughly 0.06% is impressively low. TER, or Total Expense Ratio, is like a small annual service charge that quietly chips away at returns. Keeping this number tiny is a major advantage over the long term because every 0.1% saved each year can compound into a meaningful difference over decades. This cost profile is well‑aligned with index‑based best practices and compares very favorably with typical actively managed options. Staying disciplined about using low‑cost vehicles, even when tempted by trendier, higher‑fee products, is one of the simplest and most reliable ways to support stronger long‑term performance without taking on extra risk.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey