Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it Roast mode 🔥

Almost global almost sensible and very obviously in love with big shiny US tech

Report created on May 6, 2026

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is four ETFs in a trench coat pretending to be “balanced,” while actually being 100% equity and pretty spicy. Two broad funds, one EM, one small-cap set, plus a big scoop of Nasdaq growth on top — it’s like someone started with a solid global base and then said “what if I just double down on the most volatile bits.” The structure is simple enough, but the risk score calling this “balanced” is being very generous. In practice this is an equity growth portfolio that skipped bonds entirely and then poured an extra shot of tech on it. The composition screams “all gas, some brakes drawn on with crayon.”

Growth Info

Historically, the portfolio did fine but not heroic: £1,000 became £1,647, an annual 12.47% CAGR. CAGR is just the “average speed” of growth over the trip, ignoring the bumps. You lagged the US market by 1.29% per year but very slightly beat global by 0.12%, which is basically a rounding error victory lap. Max drawdown of -23.01% means a chunky temporary hole, deeper than global but a bit worse than US — nothing catastrophic, but definitely not “balanced” behavior. Needing only 17 days to make 90% of returns shows this thing relies heavily on a few manic good days; miss them and the story looks a lot less flattering.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection basically says, “probably OK, but don’t get cocky.” Monte Carlo is just a thousand alternate-history timelines based on past volatility, like running the market through a chaotic washing machine. Median outcome: £1,000 becomes about £2,595 in 15 years, which is decent. But the 5–95% range of £998 to £7,489 is a polite way of saying anything from “flat after 15 years” to “lottery-ish upside” is on the table. The annualized 7.83% across simulations is fine, but the spread tells the truth: this portfolio is not low drama, and future returns will absolutely not follow a straight line.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

Asset classes are… singular. Stocks. Only stocks. A “balanced” profile with 100% in equities is like calling an all-chili diet “balanced cuisine.” There’s no bonds, no cash buffer, no diversifying alternatives — just pure market risk, turned up with growth tilts. That’s not inherently wrong, but let’s not pretend this is some cushioned, multi-asset symphony. When everything is equity, your fortunes rise and fall with the market mood swings. It also means any talk of downside dampening is fantasy; this is a trampoline, not a mattress. Over a long horizon that can be fine, but the label “balanced” is doing a lot of heavy lifting it doesn’t deserve.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    34%
  • Financials
    11%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    11%
  • Industrials
    10%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Health Care
    7%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Basic Materials
    5%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Real Estate
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%

Sector-wise, tech absolutely dominates at 34%, with everything else playing support act. Financials and consumer discretionary at 11% each try to make it look civilized, but this is still a tech-first, everything-else-later construction. That level of tech tilt is great when growth stories are in fashion and interest rates are friendly; it’s a lot less fun when policymakers wake up and decide money should cost something again. The rest of the spread is actually pretty normal — bits of health care, industrials, staples, etc. But the headline is clear: this portfolio is betting that the future continues to be run by giant, expensive, very moody tech and tech-adjacent names.

Regions Info

  • North America
    62%
  • Asia Developed
    11%
  • Asia Emerging
    9%
  • Europe Developed
    8%
  • Japan
    4%
  • Africa/Middle East
    2%
  • Latin America
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Europe Emerging
    1%

Geographically, it’s “USA and friends.” North America at 62% is a full-blown homecoming parade for US mega-caps, with the rest of the world invited as background dancers. Asia developed and emerging together around 20% is not bad, and you’ve at least acknowledged that Europe, Latin America, and Africa exist, which is more than many portfolios can say. Still, over half the world’s equity value sits outside North America, and you’re treating it as optional seasoning. This is a classic case of global window dressing: it looks worldly, but when push comes to shove, US market mood and policy are driving most of the experience.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    40%
  • Large-cap
    28%
  • Mid-cap
    18%
  • Small-cap
    10%
  • Micro-cap
    3%

Market cap distribution looks like someone actually tried: 40% mega, 28% large, 18% mid, 10% small, 3% micro. Thanks to that dedicated small-cap ETF, this is not the usual “only the giants matter” setup; there’s real exposure to the scrappy end of town. The trade-off is that small and micro caps can behave like caffeinated toddlers in a thunderstorm — occasionally brilliant, frequently dramatic. Combined with the mega-cap growth tilt, you’ve effectively stacked the portfolio with both the market’s celebrities and its wildcards. It’s a fun mix if you like action, but it’s also a recipe for swings that don’t match the supposedly middling risk score printed on the label.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    3.94%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Apple Inc
    3.48%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
    2.74%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    • iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS
  • Microsoft Corporation
    2.59%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Amazon.com Inc
    2.03%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    1.57%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Tesla Inc
    1.48%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
    • LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Meta Platforms Inc.
    1.44%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    1.40%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Broadcom Inc
    1.37%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Top 10 total 22.03%

Look-through holdings reveal the usual suspects all over the place: NVIDIA, Apple, TSMC, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet (twice), Tesla, Meta, Broadcom. They’re not individual positions, but they’re clearly running the show via multiple ETFs. That’s hidden concentration: different tickers, same underlying party guests. With only top-10 ETF data, this overlap is almost certainly understated; the real dependence on a handful of mega-cap growth names is higher. It’s like buying several “diversified” snack boxes and discovering they’re all 60% variations of the same crisps. The portfolio looks broad on the surface, but the biggest companies are quietly steering a lot of the outcome.

Risk contribution Info

  • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
    Weight: 30.00%
    37.0%
  • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    Weight: 30.00%
    26.7%
  • iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
    Weight: 20.00%
    19.6%
  • iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS
    Weight: 20.00%
    16.7%

Risk contribution exposes who’s actually rocking the boat. EQQQ is 30% by weight but 37.04% of total risk — it’s the loud friend at the party. The broad Vanguard global fund is more modest: 30% weight, 26.65% risk, so it’s doing some stabilizing work. Small caps and EM punch roughly in line with their weights, but the top three funds collectively drive over 83% of portfolio risk. That’s concentration in behavior, not just allocation. When EQQQ catches a cold, the whole portfolio starts sneezing. It’s efficient in a mathematical sense, but from a common-sense perspective, one ETF is dragging around more drama than its size suggests.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On the efficient frontier, this portfolio is actually… competent. Current Sharpe ratio is 0.61, with 12.98% return and 15.17% risk, and it sits on or very near the frontier. Sharpe is “return per unit of pain”; higher is better. The optimised max-Sharpe combo using the same holdings hits 0.84, but only by accepting more risk, while the minimum-variance version still gets 0.79 at lower volatility. Translation: within the sandbox of these four ETFs, the current mix is mathematically efficient — no obvious clown-shoes allocation errors. The roasting here isn’t about optimization; it’s about the fact the whole sandbox is one big equity rollercoaster.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc 0.30%
  • iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS 0.18%
  • iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR 0.35%
  • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.25%

Costs are, annoyingly, one of the best parts. A total TER of 0.25% for a four-ETF, global, small-cap-and-EM spiced equity portfolio is actually very reasonable. That’s not bargain-basement, but it’s far from daylight robbery. You’re paying modestly for some tilts and complexity beyond a single vanilla global fund. It’s like flying economy with a free checked bag — nothing glamorous, but no one’s getting fleeced either. The fun part is that with costs under control, there’s no convenient villain to blame if performance lags: what happens here is down to allocation choices, not fee drag quietly siphoning returns in the background.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey