This portfolio has only about 1 months of historical data, based on the youngest asset in the portfolio. Some metrics, projections, and AI insights may be less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.

Growth oriented portfolio mixing quality value and momentum with leveraged exposure and notable semiconductor tilt

Report created on Mar 30, 2026

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The portfolio is almost entirely in stock ETFs with a strong tilt toward factor strategies plus a small venture-style fund. Around a quarter targets U.S. small-cap value, over a third leans into momentum, and there is a focused 10% slice in semiconductors. An 8% allocation to a leveraged S&P 500 product adds extra punch to market swings. This structure is clearly built for growth rather than capital preservation. With only about one month of live data, it’s too early to judge how this mix behaves across full market cycles. Still, the takeaway is that this is an aggressive equity-heavy setup that trades stability for higher potential upside and more pronounced short-term volatility.

Growth Info

Over the brief one‑month window, $1,000 dipped to about $979, implying a calculated CAGR of -28.41% with a relatively modest max drawdown of -4.15%. In that same short span, both U.S. and global markets did worse on paper, so the portfolio “outperformed” despite negative numbers. Because this period is extremely short, these CAGR and drawdown figures mainly describe noise, not durable patterns. One or two days explained most of the outcome, which is common in small samples. The main lesson is to avoid reading too much into these early figures; true long-term behavior only shows up over several years of varied market conditions.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    96%
  • No data
    4%

Asset‑class exposure is dominated by stocks at roughly 96%, with a small slice labeled “no data.” This near‑pure equity stance lines up with a growth‑oriented risk profile and explains why returns can move quickly with market sentiment. Compared to a more balanced mix including bonds or cash, this setup offers higher long-term return potential but also deeper temporary losses during downturns. The positive side is that the equity focus is very clear and consistent. The tradeoff is reduced cushioning when markets fall. For someone seeking smoother rides, gradually adding more defensive asset classes could be one way to dial down the bumps over time.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    25%
  • Financials
    19%
  • Industrials
    15%
  • Energy
    8%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    8%
  • Basic Materials
    6%
  • Health Care
    4%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Telecommunications
    4%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector exposure is tilted toward technology at about a quarter of the portfolio, with financials and industrials also playing major roles and smaller allocations spread across the rest. This looks reasonably broad, but the added semiconductor ETF amplifies sensitivity to tech‑related themes like innovation cycles and interest‑rate changes. A tech‑heavier mix tends to do well when growth and innovation are rewarded but can be hit harder when markets rotate into more defensive or income‑oriented areas. The encouraging part is that most major sectors are represented, so the portfolio isn’t one‑dimensional, even though tech and cyclically sensitive areas clearly set much of the tone.

Regions Info

  • North America
    65%
  • Europe Developed
    15%
  • Japan
    6%
  • Asia Developed
    4%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, the portfolio leans strongly toward North America at about 65%, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, and other regions, plus small slices in emerging markets. That U.S. tilt is broadly in line with many global benchmarks and is a positive sign for diversification because it still includes significant non‑U.S. exposure. The international momentum ETF helps diversify currency and economic risk somewhat. With only a month of data, it’s impossible to tell how this mix will behave across different global cycles, but structurally it looks like a U.S.‑anchored, globally aware approach rather than a purely domestic or narrowly regional bet.

Market capitalization Info

  • Large-cap
    27%
  • Mega-cap
    26%
  • Small-cap
    15%
  • Mid-cap
    13%
  • Micro-cap
    11%

Market‑cap exposure is nicely spread across mega, large, mid, small, and even micro‑cap stocks. Mega and large caps together make up just over half, while smaller companies still get a meaningful share. This blend supports diversification because mega caps tend to be more stable and liquid, while small and micro caps can add extra growth potential and volatility. The very high small‑cap value slice fits this picture. With limited performance history, it’s too soon to see how this size mix holds up in stress, but structurally it provides a healthy balance between established giants and more nimble, potentially faster‑growing companies.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    3.03%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • ProShares Ultra S&P500
  • Broadcom Inc
    2.23%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • ProShares Ultra S&P500
  • Micron Technology Inc
    1.64%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
  • Lam Research Corp
    1.18%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    0.90%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • ProShares Ultra S&P500
  • Johnson & Johnson
    0.79%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
  • Advanced Micro Devices Inc
    0.74%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    0.72%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • ProShares Ultra S&P500
  • Apple Inc
    0.64%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF
    • ProShares Ultra S&P500
  • HSBC Holdings PLC
    0.62%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
  • Top 10 total 12.50%

The look‑through view shows meaningful overlap in large tech names, especially semiconductors and mega‑cap platforms. NVIDIA, Broadcom, Micron, and Lam Research together already take a notable slice, and names like Alphabet and Apple appear across multiple ETFs. Because only ETF top‑10 holdings are visible, this likely understates the real overlap. Hidden concentration like this can boost returns when those companies lead, but also ties the portfolio to the fate of a relatively narrow group. The constructive side is that these are widely followed, high‑liquidity names, but it’s worth being aware that several different funds may be riding similar underlying trends at the same time.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
Very high
Data availability: 42%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
Low
Data availability: 96%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
High
Data availability: 30%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
Very high
Data availability: 6%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 96%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 78%

Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.

Factor exposure is where this portfolio really stands out. It shows very high tilts to value and quality, plus a strong lean toward momentum. Factors are like investment “personality traits” that research links to long‑term returns. A high value tilt means more exposure to stocks that look cheap relative to fundamentals, while high quality points to companies with stronger balance sheets and profitability. High momentum leans into names that have been recent winners. This combination can work well when economic conditions reward fundamentals and clear trends, but can lag during sharp style rotations. The structured factor tilts are a real strength and align nicely with evidence‑based investing.

Risk contribution Info

  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
    Weight: 15.00%
    19.0%
  • American Century ETF Trust
    Weight: 18.00%
    17.8%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
    Weight: 24.00%
    15.2%
  • Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
    Weight: 10.00%
    13.7%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    Weight: 15.00%
    11.4%
  • Top 5 risk contribution 77.0%

Risk contribution data shows that not all holdings affect volatility in proportion to their weights. The international momentum ETF, at 15% weight, contributes about 19% of overall risk, and the semiconductor ETF at 10% weight drives almost 14% of risk. Meanwhile, the largest position, U.S. small‑cap value at 24%, contributes only around 15% of total risk, reflecting its more diversified or less volatile behavior recently. This is a classic example of how a smaller but punchier fund can dominate the “feel” of the portfolio. Rebalancing or slightly trimming the highest risk‑contributors is one way investors often bring the overall experience closer to their intended comfort level.

Redundant positions Info

  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
    American Century ETF Trust
    High correlation

Correlation measures how similarly two investments move, with 1 meaning they tend to go up and down together. Here, the American Century ETF Trust and the international momentum ETF have moved almost identically over the short sample. Because we only have about a month of data, this might not hold in other environments, but it hints that these two slices may respond to similar drivers right now. When assets are highly correlated, they provide less diversification in a crisis than their number of line items might suggest. Watching correlations over time can help decide whether some holdings are effectively doubling up on the same type of exposure.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On the risk‑return chart, the current portfolio sits well below the efficient frontier, with a negative Sharpe ratio and a large gap to the best achievable mix using the same ingredients. The efficient frontier represents the highest expected return for each risk level if weights were optimized. Here, numbers show that, even at the same overall volatility, different weightings could have delivered better simulated risk‑adjusted returns over the brief data period. Because this is based on about a month of history, these optimization results are fragile and may change quickly. Still, it signals room to tweak weights if the goal is to move closer to an efficient, smoother ride.

Dividends Info

  • American Century ETF Trust 3.20%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.40%
  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 4.00%
  • Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF 0.50%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF 1.20%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.90%
  • ProShares Ultra S&P500 0.60%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.82%

The blended dividend yield for the portfolio is about 1.82%, with some funds paying meaningfully more and others focused purely on growth. For a growth‑oriented equity mix, this is a reasonable income level and suggests that most of the expected return is intended to come from price appreciation rather than payouts. Dividends can still provide a small cushion in down markets and a helpful baseline return over time. With such a short track record, realized income so far doesn’t mean much, but structurally the portfolio looks geared toward total return, with dividends as a side benefit rather than the primary objective.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • American Century ETF Trust 0.34%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 0.25%
  • Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF 0.19%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF 0.15%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.13%
  • ProShares Ultra S&P500 0.91%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.28%

The average total expense ratio comes in around 0.28%, which is impressively low given the use of specialized factor and sector ETFs. Most holdings sit well under 0.35%, with the main outlier being the leveraged S&P 500 product at 0.91%. Lower ongoing costs are powerful because they compound in the investor’s favor year after year, leaving more of the gross return in their pocket. Over decades, even a 0.2–0.3% difference can add up meaningfully. This cost structure is a real positive: the portfolio manages to express quite targeted views (value, quality, momentum, semis) without paying a steep fee premium to do so.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey