A broadly diversified stock focused portfolio with strong growth tilt and impressively low ongoing costs

Report created on Aug 11, 2024

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is built almost entirely from four broad stock ETFs, with roughly two thirds in total US and international funds and one third split between dividend and growth tilts. That structure keeps things simple and highly diversified, while still adding a couple of style “flavors.” For a balanced risk profile, being 99% in stocks is on the aggressive side, but the broad index exposure helps smooth out single-company risk. This setup is very close to common benchmark mixes and is well-aligned with modern index-based investing. The main thing to think about is whether the extra style ETFs are adding enough benefit given their overlap with the core total-market fund.

Growth Info

Using the historical Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of about 14%, a hypothetical $10,000 invested over 10 years would have grown to around $37,000, assuming you stayed fully invested. CAGR is like your long-term “average speed” on a road trip, smoothing out the bumps. The max drawdown of about -34% shows that in a serious downturn, the portfolio can drop by a third, which is normal for a stock-heavy mix. The fact that returns are concentrated in just 34 days for 90% of gains underlines why staying invested consistently matters. As always, past performance can’t guarantee similar future results.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which simulates many random future paths using historical patterns, shows a very wide range of possible outcomes. A 5th percentile end value near 96% suggests that in tougher scenarios, you might barely break even over the period, while the median and higher percentiles point to several-fold growth potential. Monte Carlo is like running 1,000 alternate “timelines” to see how things might play out, but it still depends heavily on past data and assumptions. It’s encouraging that most simulations are positive, yet it’s important to remember that rare events or regime changes can make the future meaningfully different from what the model suggests.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Cash
    1%

With 99% in stocks and just 1% in cash, the portfolio is essentially an all-equity strategy. That’s great for long-term growth potential but means short-term volatility can be high, especially during market stress. Compared with many “balanced” benchmarks that include bonds and other stabilizing assets, this mix is more growth-oriented and will swing more with equity markets. The classification as “Broadly Diversified” reflects how well spread the stock exposure is, not how balanced it is across asset classes. Someone using this structure might consider whether they want to handle stock-like volatility through full market cycles or prefer to add a meaningful cushion from steadier assets.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    27%
  • Financials
    14%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    11%
  • Health Care
    10%
  • Industrials
    10%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Consumer Staples
    7%
  • Energy
    6%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is nicely spread across all major areas of the economy, with meaningful positions in technology, financials, consumer areas, healthcare, and industrials. Tech sits at the top around a quarter of the portfolio, which is very similar to common broad equity benchmarks and supports long-term growth, especially when innovation is rewarded. However, tech-heavy allocations can feel rougher when interest rates rise or when growth expectations cool off, since valuations there tend to be more sensitive. The fact that every major sector shows up at non-trivial weights is a strong positive sign for diversification. This structure helps avoid over-reliance on a single economic story.

Regions Info

  • North America
    77%
  • Europe Developed
    9%
  • Asia Emerging
    4%
  • Japan
    4%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, about three quarters in North America with the rest spread across Europe, Asia, and smaller regions is quite close to typical global market weights. That U.S. tilt has been very rewarding over the last decade and aligns with many standard benchmarks, which is a solid sign you’re not making an extreme regional bet. At the same time, there is still exposure to both developed and emerging markets abroad, which can help if leadership rotates away from the U.S. in future cycles. Global diversification helps reduce the risk of any one country’s economy, politics, or currency dominating your results, even though it doesn’t eliminate market-wide equity swings.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    39%
  • Large-cap
    34%
  • Mid-cap
    19%
  • Small-cap
    5%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

The portfolio leans heavily toward mega and large-cap companies, with smaller weights in mid, small, and micro caps. This large-cap focus usually brings more stability and better liquidity, since these are established firms with deeper markets. It also matches major benchmarks well, which is another sign the structure is in line with common best practices. The modest slice of mid and small caps adds a bit of extra growth potential and diversification, though it won’t dominate behavior. Because the style ETFs tilt to large-cap dividend and large-cap growth, short-term performance will be driven mainly by the biggest names, which can concentrate the impact of broad market sentiment and index heavyweights.

Redundant positions Info

  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

The highly correlated relationship between the U.S. large-cap growth ETF and the total U.S. stock market ETF means they tend to move together almost in lockstep. Correlation measures how similarly assets move; when it’s high, you don’t gain much diversification by holding both. In practice, this overlap can lead to double exposure to the same big growth names while making the portfolio feel more concentrated than the number of funds suggests. Reducing overlap doesn’t mean abandoning growth exposure, but rather deciding whether you want that tilt to be explicit and strong, or if a simpler, more streamlined structure with fewer overlapping funds would better match your comfort level.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On an Efficient Frontier chart—which shows the best possible trade-off between risk and return for a given set of assets—this portfolio looks strong but slightly improvable. Efficient Frontier just means “for this specific menu of investments, is there a mix that gives either more return for the same risk or less risk for the same return?” Because two of the funds are highly correlated, there may be a more streamlined allocation among the existing ETFs that keeps overall risk similar while improving the risk-return ratio. “Efficiency” here is purely about that math-based trade-off and doesn’t automatically account for preferences like simplicity, income focus, or behavioral comfort.

Dividends Info

  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.80%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.85%

The overall yield of about 1.85% reflects a mix of a high-yield dividend ETF and lower-yield growth and broad-market funds. That’s a reasonable income level for a growth-oriented equity portfolio and compares well to many stock indexes today. Dividends can act like a steady drip of cash that supports returns even when prices move sideways, which is particularly appealing for reinvestment or for future income needs. The dedicated dividend ETF meaningfully boosts the yield compared with a pure growth mix. Just keep in mind that income-focused stocks can behave differently than high-growth names in changing rate environments, adding another dimension of style exposure on top of the broad market base.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%

With a total ongoing cost (TER) around 0.04%, this portfolio is extremely cost-efficient. Fees are like friction on a car: small differences compound surprisingly over long periods. Being this close to rock-bottom index fund pricing is a major strength and lines up with best practices for long-term investing. Low costs make it easier for the portfolio’s gross performance to show up in your actual returns, instead of being eaten away each year. When you’re already at this level, there’s usually not much to gain from chasing slightly cheaper options; the bigger question becomes whether simplifying overlapping holdings or adjusting risk levels better reflects your long-term plan and comfort.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey