Diversified global equity and gold allocation with strong value tilt and moderate energy emphasis
Report created on Mar 21, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
SC Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
SCHB - US8085241029 25.00% -
SC Schwab International Equity ETF
SCHF - US8085248057 20.00% -
IA iShares Gold Trust
IAU - US4642852044 15.00% -
SC Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
SCHD - US8085247976 15.00% -
SC Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
SCHE - US8085247067 15.00% -
VD Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF Shares
VDE - US92204A3068 10.00%
The portfolio is built around broad, low-cost equity ETFs with a meaningful 15% gold allocation as a diversifier. Roughly a quarter sits in a total U.S. market fund, supported by international, emerging markets, and a dedicated U.S. dividend ETF. A 10% slice goes to a focused energy ETF, which adds both sector tilt and commodity sensitivity. Structurally, this lines up with a balanced growth approach that still respects downside risk. For many investors, a setup like this can serve as a core, long-term allocation where stocks drive growth, gold softens some shocks, and tilts toward dividends and energy shape the pattern of returns over time.
Growth
From 2016 to early 2026, the hypothetical $1,000 grew to $2,993, which is very close to the global market’s $2,989 but behind the U.S. market’s $3,757. The CAGR (compound annual growth rate, like average speed over a road trip) is 12.11%, solidly strong, though slightly under the U.S. benchmark’s 14.19%. Max drawdown of about -31.5% is a bit milder than both reference markets, suggesting drawdowns have been somewhat contained. Only 35 days made up 90% of returns, highlighting how a handful of big days drive long-term growth. Overall, historical performance is respectable and globally aligned, but not as aggressive as a pure U.S.-equity tilt.
Projection
The Monte Carlo simulation projects many possible 10‑year paths by remixing historical return and volatility patterns. Think of it as running 1,000 “what if” futures based on how the portfolio has behaved in the past, not as a prediction. The median outcome shows about 361% cumulative growth, while even the weak 5th percentile still ends positive at roughly 36%. That’s an encouraging distribution, although 10-year forward returns can differ a lot from history if markets change regime. The main takeaway is that the portfolio’s mix of risk and return has historically produced a high chance of long-term growth, but outcomes will always remain uncertain and path-dependent.
Asset classes
- Stocks 85%
- Other 15%
Asset allocation is simple and clear: about 85% in stocks and 15% in “other,” which here is gold. This stock-heavy stance lines up well with a balanced-to-growth risk profile, where capital growth is the main objective and short-term swings are acceptable. The dedicated gold allocation is a classic diversifier, often behaving differently from stocks, especially around inflation spikes or market stress. Compared with a pure-equity portfolio, this setup sacrifices a bit of long-run return potential for some cushioning in bad periods. That tradeoff fits nicely with many long-horizon investors who still want some ballast against equity market shocks.
Sectors
- Energy 16%
- Technology 16%
- Financials 12%
- Industrials 9%
- Health Care 7%
- Consumer Discretionary 7%
- Consumer Staples 6%
- Telecommunications 5%
- Basic Materials 3%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 1%
Sector exposure is broadly spread, with no single area overwhelming the portfolio. Energy and technology each sit around 16%, with financials, industrials, healthcare, and consumer sectors filling out much of the rest. This looks reasonably balanced compared with common market benchmarks, but the dedicated energy ETF pushes energy slightly higher than a pure market-weighted mix. Such an energy tilt can help when commodities and resource companies are in favor but may drag during low oil-price environments or transitions away from fossil fuels. The tech allocation remains strong through broad-market exposure, keeping participation in innovation without an extreme growth bias.
Regions
- North America 52%
- Europe Developed 10%
- Asia Emerging 8%
- Asia Developed 6%
- Japan 4%
- Africa/Middle East 2%
- Latin America 1%
- Australasia 1%
Geographically, just over half the portfolio is in North America, with meaningful allocations to developed Europe, developed Asia, Japan, and emerging regions. This is more globally diversified than a U.S.-only approach and actually more international-leaning than the U.S. market itself, which tends to be heavily domestic. That broader spread can reduce dependence on any single economy or policy environment, particularly useful if U.S. leadership fades for a period. At the same time, higher exposure to emerging markets and non-U.S. regions can introduce currency and political risks. Overall, the regional mix is well-balanced and aligns closely with global diversification best practices.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 31%
- Large-cap 30%
- Mid-cap 18%
- No data 15%
- Small-cap 3%
- Micro-cap 1%
Market cap exposure is dominated by mega and large companies, with about 61% in mega/big caps, plus moderate mid-cap and a small slice of small and micro. This is very much in line with a typical global equity index profile, where the largest companies naturally carry the most weight. Large caps usually bring more stability, stronger balance sheets, and better liquidity than smaller firms, which can help smooth volatility. The mid and small-cap exposure adds some growth and dynamism without overwhelming the portfolio. This allocation is well-balanced and aligns closely with global standards for diversified equity investing.
True holdings
-
XO Exxon Mobil Corp 2.51%
Part of fund(s):- Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
- Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF Shares
-
CV Chevron Corp 2.34%
Part of fund(s):- Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
- Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
- Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF Shares
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 2.13%
Part of fund(s):- Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 1.72%
Part of fund(s):- Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
-
AA Apple Inc 1.44%
Part of fund(s):- Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
-
CO ConocoPhillips 1.30%
Part of fund(s):- Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
- Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF Shares
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 1.15%
Part of fund(s):- Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 0.80%
Part of fund(s):- Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
-
VZ Verizon Communications Inc 0.76%
Part of fund(s):- Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
- Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
-
LM Lockheed Martin Corporation 0.73%
Part of fund(s):- Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
- Top 10 total 14.89%
Looking through the ETFs, the largest underlying exposures cluster in mega-cap energy and tech names like Exxon, Chevron, TSMC, NVIDIA, and Apple. Several of these appear in multiple funds, so the real concentration is higher than each single ETF weight suggests. For example, Exxon and Chevron are boosted by both the broad market and the dedicated energy ETF, creating a meaningful energy-company cluster. Because only top-10 ETF holdings are captured, overlap is understated; many smaller shared names won’t show up. This kind of hidden concentration is normal but worth being aware of, since big moves in a handful of mega caps can disproportionately influence overall portfolio behavior.
Factors
Factor exposure shows strong tilts toward value, size (favoring smaller vs the largest names), and yield, with moderate momentum and low-volatility traits. Factors are like underlying “personality traits” of stocks that research has linked to long-run returns. A high value and yield tilt suggests a bias toward companies that are cheaper relative to fundamentals and that pay higher dividends, which can do well after periods when expensive growth has led. The size tilt away from the absolute giants can sometimes boost returns but may raise volatility. Because signal coverage is only partial, these readings are directional, not exact, yet they clearly indicate a pro-value, income-oriented style.
Risk contribution
-
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Weight: 25.00% 28.1% -
Schwab International Equity ETF
Weight: 20.00% 21.2% -
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Weight: 15.00% 16.5% -
Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 10.00% 15.0% -
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Weight: 15.00% 14.8% - Top 5 risk contribution 95.5%
Risk contribution shows how much each position drives overall ups and downs, which can differ a lot from simple weights. The broad U.S. ETF, international ETF, and emerging markets ETF together generate about two-thirds of portfolio risk, roughly matching their combined weight. The standout is the energy ETF: at 10% weight it contributes about 15% of risk, giving it a risk-to-weight ratio of 1.5. That means swings in energy prices and sector sentiment have an outsized impact compared with its share of capital. Periodically revisiting whether this extra risk is intentional can help keep the portfolio’s behavior aligned with personal comfort levels.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk–return chart, the current allocation sits below the efficient frontier, meaning there’s a more favorable tradeoff possible using the same ETFs. The Sharpe ratio of 0.71 trails both the optimal and minimum-variance mixes, which are above 1.0. In plain terms, the existing weights aren’t squeezing as much return as possible from each unit of risk. Reweighting could either reduce volatility at roughly similar return or increase expected return for only a modest risk change. The same-risk “optimized” point shown has much higher risk, so a more realistic target would be closer to the min-variance or max-Sharpe mix for smoother efficiency gains.
Dividends
- Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF 1.20%
- Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.40%
- Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF 2.90%
- Schwab International Equity ETF 3.40%
- Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF Shares 2.30%
- Weighted yield (per year) 2.16%
The overall yield of about 2.16% is a blend of modest income from the broad U.S. market and higher payouts from the dividend, international, emerging, and energy ETFs. That’s a decent starting income stream for an equity-focused portfolio, especially given the strong tilt toward dividend and value factors. Dividends can be useful both for reinvestment (compounding over time) and, later, for partial cash-flow needs. Compared with many pure growth portfolios, this yield-oriented stance may lag in momentum-driven tech booms but can feel more supportive during flat or choppy markets. It offers a nice balance between growth and ongoing income potential.
Ongoing product costs
- iShares Gold Trust 0.25%
- Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF 0.03%
- Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
- Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF 0.11%
- Schwab International Equity ETF 0.06%
- Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.09%
Fees are impressively low, with a blended total expense ratio around 0.09%. That’s well below what many actively managed funds charge and right in line with best-in-class index investing. Costs matter because they come off returns every year, like a small but constant headwind. Over decades, even a 0.5% fee difference can materially affect ending wealth. Here, using broad, low-cost ETFs keeps that drag minimal, supporting better long-term outcomes. This cost profile is a real strength and aligns tightly with evidence-based investing principles that emphasize fee control as one of the most reliable ways to improve net performance.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey