High octane growth portfolio leaning on semiconductors momentum and a gold volatility cushion
Report created on Apr 7, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
Positions
-
SM VanEck Semiconductor ETF
SMH - US92189F6768 50.00% -
SP Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
SPMO - US46138E3392 30.00% -
GL SPDR® Gold Shares
GLD - US78463V1070 20.00%
This portfolio is built around three ETFs: roughly half in a semiconductor fund, about a third in a momentum-focused equity fund, and the rest in gold. So around 80% sits in stocks and 20% in gold as a diversifier. That’s a very growth-heavy setup with a single industry (chips) as the main engine, plus a momentum tilt that chases recent winners. Gold plays the role of a shock absorber rather than a return driver. For someone comfortable with big swings, this structure can be exciting. Anyone wanting smoother, more broadly spread growth would usually look for more variety in both stock types and defensive assets.
Growth
Historically, this mix has been a rocket ship: a hypothetical $1,000 grew to about $10,061, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) near 30%. CAGR is like your average speed on a long road trip, smoothing out ups and downs. That’s far ahead of both the US and global markets, which grew around 13–16% a year. The trade-off is a max drawdown of roughly -38%, steeper than broad markets, with almost a year to bottom and another nine months to recover. This shows how powerful high-growth themes can be, but also how emotionally and financially demanding the ride is when they correct.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection uses many simulated paths based on historical volatility and returns to see a range of possible 15‑year outcomes. Think of it as rolling the dice 1,000 times using past patterns as a guide, not a prophecy. The “most likely” path takes $1,000 to about $2,488, implying around 7% a year, with a wide possible range from roughly $1,034 to $6,042. That spread highlights how uncertain high‑growth investing is. Past data is only a rough map; future markets can look very different. The key takeaway is to treat these numbers as scenario ranges, not promises, and to check that you’re comfortable with both the upside and the less glamorous outcomes.
Asset classes
- Stocks 80%
- Other 20%
By asset class, about 80% is in equities and 20% in “other,” effectively gold. This is firmly in growth territory; income-focused or capital-preservation setups usually hold much more in bonds or cash-like assets. The equity portion provides most of the long-term return potential but also drives most of the volatility. Gold’s 20% allocation is a meaningful stabilizer, historically often zigging when stocks zag, especially in stress periods. For a growth investor, this blend is a classic aggressive core with a single, simple hedge layered on top. Someone wanting more resilience across different economic environments might normally mix in more varied defensive assets, not just gold.
Sectors
- Technology 63%
- Industrials 5%
- Telecommunications 3%
- Health Care 3%
- Financials 2%
- Consumer Staples 1%
- Energy 1%
- Basic Materials 1%
- Utilities 1%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Sector-wise, this portfolio is dominated by technology at about 63%, with only small slivers in industrials, telecoms, health care, financials, and other areas. That’s a stark tilt relative to broad market benchmarks, where tech is big but not this overwhelming. Heavy tech exposure can be great in periods of innovation booms, low interest rates, and strong demand for digital infrastructure and AI. But it also tends to be very sensitive to rate hikes, regulation, and cyclical slowdowns in corporate spending. The positive here is clear conviction and participation in a powerful long-term theme; the flip side is that sector-specific shocks would hit almost everything at once.
Regions
- North America 71%
- Asia Developed 6%
- Europe Developed 3%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Geographically, about 71% of the equity exposure is in North America, with smaller slices in developed Asia and Europe. That’s a strong home bias relative to global market weights, which spread more across regions. Concentrating in one region ties a lot of your fate to a single economic cycle, political system, and currency. North America, especially the US, has led performance over the past decade, so this has been rewarding. The upside is alignment with a deep, innovative market that’s well represented in global indices. The trade-off is less diversification if other regions outperform or if North America hits a prolonged rough patch.
Market capitalization
- Large-cap 39%
- Mega-cap 33%
- No data 20%
- Mid-cap 8%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Market cap exposure leans heavily toward mega‑caps and large‑caps, together a bit over 70%, with a modest slice in mid‑caps. That means most of your equity risk is tied to the biggest, most established companies, which are often more liquid and better diversified than smaller peers. This fits well with the top‑down themes here: leading chip makers and big momentum names tend to be large. The benefit is that you’re not overly reliant on tiny, fragile firms. The catch is that large, popular names can become crowded trades; when the tide turns, they can fall together. Still, from a size perspective, this is quite aligned with mainstream benchmarks.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 12.56%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AV Broadcom Inc 5.97%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
TS Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 5.80%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
LR Lam Research Corp 3.25%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AM Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.13%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AS ASML Holding NV ADR 2.43%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
IN Intel Corporation 2.42%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
KL KLA Corporation 2.38%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AD Analog Devices Inc 2.30%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AM Applied Materials Inc 2.29%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Top 10 total 42.53%
Looking through the ETFs, a huge chunk of risk and return hangs on a handful of chip giants. NVIDIA alone is over 12% of the portfolio via the funds, with Broadcom, TSMC, AMD, ASML, Intel and others adding sizeable slices. Because the same companies appear in multiple products, there’s hidden concentration: it looks like three ETFs, but under the hood it’s really a cluster around a narrow set of leaders. Overlap may even be higher than shown because only top-10 holdings are counted. This can turbocharge gains when those names are hot, but it also means company- or industry-specific shocks ripple through almost everything you own.
Factors
Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.
Factor exposure shows a strong tilt toward momentum at about 65%, meaning the portfolio leans into stocks that have risen sharply recently. Factor exposure is like checking which “personality traits” your holdings share. High momentum can boost returns when trends persist but often amplifies drawdowns when leaders reverse. Value, yield, and low volatility scores are all low, signaling a tilt away from cheaper, steadier, or income‑oriented names. Size and quality are around neutral, close to the market. So this is a classic high‑octane growth profile: chasing winners rather than bargains or defensives. That’s worked very well in the backtest, but it relies on trends continuing rather than snapping abruptly.
Risk contribution
-
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Weight: 50.00% 72.2% -
Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
Weight: 30.00% 24.1% -
SPDR® Gold Shares
Weight: 20.00% 3.6%
Risk contribution highlights how much each holding drives the portfolio’s ups and downs, which can differ a lot from simple weights. The semiconductor ETF is 50% of capital but contributes over 72% of total risk, a risk/weight ratio of about 1.44. That means it dominates the volatility picture. The momentum ETF pulls its weight more modestly, and gold is the opposite: 20% of capital but only about 4% of risk, really acting as a stabilizer. This is a textbook case where one position is the star of both gains and turbulence. Anyone managing this kind of structure needs to be okay with chips essentially steering the portfolio, with the other two mainly smoothing the ride.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk–return chart, the current portfolio sits below the efficient frontier, with a Sharpe ratio of 1.04. The Sharpe ratio compares excess return over a risk-free rate to volatility, like measuring how much “bang for your risk buck” you get. The optimal mix of these same three holdings has a higher Sharpe of 1.32 at lower risk, and even the minimum-variance blend scores better. Being about 1.4 percentage points below the frontier at this risk level means the same ingredients could be shuffled to get a smoother or more rewarding ride. The good news: the building blocks are strong; the opportunity lies in fine‑tuning position sizes rather than changing what you own.
Dividends
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.30%
- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.90%
- Weighted yield (per year) 0.42%
Dividend yield across the portfolio is very low, around 0.42% overall, with both equity ETFs offering under 1%. That’s typical for growth and momentum strategies, which favor companies reinvesting heavily rather than paying shareholders regular income. Dividends can act like a small “paycheck” that helps total returns and can soften downturns a bit, but they’re not the main story here. This setup is about capital appreciation, not cash flow. That’s perfectly fine if the priority is long-term growth and you don’t need the portfolio to cover living expenses. Income-focused investors, though, would usually expect a much higher yield or a mix that includes more dividend-oriented holdings.
Ongoing product costs
- SPDR® Gold Shares 0.40%
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.13%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.29%
Total ongoing costs, measured by TER (Total Expense Ratio), sit around 0.29% a year. TER is the percentage fee the funds charge annually, taken out of returns behind the scenes. For a specialized, thematic, and factor-based mix like this, that’s impressively low and broadly in line with many core ETFs. Lower costs matter because they’re one of the few things you can control: every 0.1% you don’t pay is 0.1% that keeps compounding for you year after year. From a fee perspective, this portfolio is on solid ground, and costs are not a drag on performance in any meaningful way.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey