Roast mode 🔥

High octane dividend cosplay portfolio with a secret day trading addiction hiding in the back seat

Report created on Mar 22, 2026

Risk profile Info

7/7
Speculative
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

2/5
Low Diversity
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

Structurally this thing looks like a retiree’s income portfolio that accidentally snorted a line of crypto-beta. Half the weight is in a few chunky individual names, the rest sprinkled into broad ETFs like duct tape pretending to be diversification. You’ve got nearly 20% in one REIT, 13% in an old industrial, another 12% in a BDC, and then a random 5% rocket ship in Applied Digital just to keep your blood pressure interesting. The setup is: “steady income grandpa” with one small-cap maniac driving almost half the risk. Takeaway: position sizing should match risk, not vibes — here, vibes clearly won the argument.

Growth Info

The historic performance is pure fever dream: turning 1,000 into 17,945 in under six years with a 110% CAGR. For context, the U.S. market crawled to about 2,388 with ~17% CAGR. But then we see the fine print: a -90% max drawdown. That’s “portfolio fell down an elevator shaft” territory. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is like your average speed on a road trip; max drawdown is the time you drove off a cliff and crawled back up. Also, 90% of gains came from 14 days — basically a meme-stock personality. Translation: heroic returns built on luck, timing, and extreme pain tolerance, not steady compounding.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection is where math politely tells you this is a casino. Monte Carlo basically reruns history a thousand different ways to see possible futures — like remixing your past return chaos. Median outcome: +1,555% over 10 years, which is absurdly high. But the 5th percentile is -87.5%, meaning in the ugly scenarios your money mostly evaporates. Also, that 59% annualized simulated return is based on a completely wild historical profile; past data is like yesterday’s weather — helpful, but not prophecy. Overall: huge upside if the circus continues, but the downside is “watch your decade of saving vanish and start over.”

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Not classified
    1%

Asset classes: basically 99% stock, 1% “who even cares.” So the risk classification as “Speculative” with a 7/7 score isn’t an insult, it’s just accurate labeling. Assets are supposed to be your shock absorbers — bonds, cash, alternatives, things that don’t all swing together. Here, there are no shock absorbers, just four different engines bolted to a shopping cart. That’s fine if the goal is max long-term growth and you truly don’t care about brutal drawdowns, but let’s not pretend this is balanced. Anyone needing stability, liquidity, or sleep would want at least one non-equity friend in the room.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    21%
  • Real Estate
    20%
  • Industrials
    16%
  • Financials
    14%
  • Consumer Staples
    10%
  • Energy
    6%
  • Health Care
    4%
  • Utilities
    3%
  • Telecommunications
    3%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    3%

Sector-wise, this is a weird cocktail: 21% tech, 20% real estate, 16% industrials, 14% financials, 10% defensive, with a bit of energy and utilities sprinkled in. The real estate chunk is mostly one REIT, so that 20% is basically a single landlord. Tech gets a boost from Broadcom plus the Vanguard tech ETF, which is the “growth engine” glued onto an otherwise stodgy dividend core. This is less “thoughtful sector allocation” and more “income-heavy with a tech side quest.” Takeaway: sector weights are fine-ish overall, but the internal concentration means those sector labels are lying about how diversified you actually are.

Regions Info

  • North America
    100%

Geography: 100% North America. So the rest of the planet apparently doesn’t exist, or at least doesn’t pay dividends in a way that felt worth your time. This home-country bias is super common, but still lazy: it’s like eating only one cuisine forever because you live near that restaurant. The risk is economic, political, and currency exposure all tied to one region. If the local market lags or gets smacked by regulation, you’re along for the full ride. A more global mix usually smooths things out a bit — you don’t want your entire future hinging on one economic storyline.

Market capitalization Info

  • Large-cap
    58%
  • Mid-cap
    25%
  • Mega-cap
    13%
  • Small-cap
    2%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

Market cap mix is actually the least chaotic part: 58% big, 25% mid, 13% mega, tiny bits in small and micro. So you’re mostly riding established names, not a tiny-cap circus — except Applied Digital, which is clearly your wildcard child. This setup is like wearing a normal outfit with one neon shoe: passable at a distance, questionable up close. The big and mega exposure helps stability relative to a pure small-cap binge, but it doesn’t save you from concentration or stock-specific blowups. The takeaway: size balance is reasonably sane; it’s the individual-name bets that push this from “bold” to “spicy.”

True holdings Info

  • Realty Income Corporation
    19.52%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Direct holding 19.52%
  • 3M Company
    12.94%
    Part of fund(s):
    • JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Direct holding 12.85%
  • Main Street Capital Corporation
    11.68%
  • Broadcom Inc
    7.23%
    Part of fund(s):
    • JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Direct holding 6.87%
  • Altria Group
    6.15%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Direct holding 5.41%
  • Applied Digital Corporation
    5.26%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Direct holding 5.26%
  • Nextera Energy Inc
    2.48%
    Part of fund(s):
    • JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Direct holding 2.36%
  • Marathon Petroleum Corp
    1.64%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Direct holding 1.64%
  • NVIDIA Corporation
    1.09%
    Part of fund(s):
    • JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • T-Mobile US Inc
    1.07%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Direct holding 1.06%
  • Top 10 total 69.06%

The look-through holdings scream “I know these tickers personally.” Realty Income at ~20%, 3M at ~13%, Main Street at ~12%, Broadcom and Altria right behind them — this isn’t diversification, it’s a fan club. Overlap is modest on paper (a bit of 3M, Broadcom, Altria via ETFs), but that’s only top-10 ETF holdings, so the real duplication is likely higher. Think of overlap as owning multiple different-looking cereal boxes that all contain the same cornflakes. The big message: you’re not owning “lots of stuff,” you’re owning a small handful of names in multiple costumes, and they’re running the show.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 84%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
Very low
Data availability: 77%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 100%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
High
Data availability: 67%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
Very high
Data availability: 86%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
High
Data availability: 99%

Factor-wise, this thing is a textbook “I love income but also drama” portfolio. Dominant tilts: yield, quality, and low volatility, with decent value and momentum. Factors are like the secret ingredients behind returns — yield is your dividend obsession, quality is sturdier businesses, low vol is supposed to be smoother rides. On paper, that sounds sensible, but reality disagrees when one 5% holding is causing almost half the risk. So you’ve built a solid, yieldy base and then stapled a speculative rocket to the side. In calm or gently rising markets, this could feel great; in chaos, the factor profile won’t protect you from single-name blowups.

Risk contribution Info

  • Applied Digital Corporation
    Weight: 5.26%
    47.5%
  • Realty Income Corporation
    Weight: 19.52%
    10.4%
  • 3M Company
    Weight: 12.85%
    8.8%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
    Weight: 17.54%
    8.5%
  • Main Street Capital Corporation
    Weight: 11.68%
    6.8%
  • Top 5 risk contribution 81.9%

Risk contribution is where the portfolio’s mask comes off. Applied Digital: 5.26% weight, 47.49% of total portfolio risk. That’s a risk-to-weight ratio of 9x — one small position is basically the main character. Meanwhile, the 19.5% in Realty Income only throws in ~10% of risk. Risk contribution tells you who’s actually shaking the portfolio, not who looks big on paper. Here, your supposed “core” holdings are passengers while a 5% flyer drives the volatility bus. General guidance: if one mid-sized position is doing half the drama, trimming it or capping its weight can massively calm things down without changing the rest much.

Redundant positions Info

  • FIDELITY ZERO TOTAL MARKET INDEX FUND
    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

Correlations are mostly an issue around your broad-market funds: the Fidelity ZERO total market and Vanguard total market ETFs move almost in lockstep, which is expected — they’re basically two labels on the same soda. High correlation means when one drops, the other tags along; you don’t get much diversification benefit holding both. More broadly, with everything in U.S. equities and heavy overlap in large caps and dividend names, plenty of your stuff will sink together in a real crash. Correlation is like having multiple friends who all lose their jobs in the same recession — comforting company, not helpful outcomes.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On the risk–return chart, the portfolio actually sits on the efficient frontier, which is mildly infuriating because it means the chaos is at least mathematically “efficient.” The Sharpe ratio (return per unit of risk) is 1.65, while the optimal version of these same holdings hits 2.16 with slightly higher risk. Minimum variance sits lower with less risk and less return. Translation: with your current mix you’re not wasting risk, but you are aiming squarely at the high-volatility end. The “same-risk optimized” number is clearly garbage in the data (388% return at 267% risk), so ignore that clown. Still, small reweights could nudge you closer to the higher-Sharpe mix while staying in the same overall style.

Dividends Info

  • Broadcom Inc 0.60%
  • FIDELITY ZERO TOTAL MARKET INDEX FUND 1.10%
  • JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF 8.40%
  • Main Street Capital Corporation 7.20%
  • 3M Company 2.10%
  • Altria Group 6.50%
  • Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.60%
  • Nextera Energy Inc 2.60%
  • Realty Income Corporation 5.30%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.40%
  • T-Mobile US Inc 1.80%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.20%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 3.88%

Dividend yield at 3.88% is comfortably above the broad market, so the income theme is loud and clear. You’ve got juicy payers like JEPI, Main Street, Altria, and Realty Income doing the heavy lifting. The catch: chasing high yield can be like picking restaurants only by portion size — sometimes you’re just getting cheap calories and hidden problems. Also, that 8%+ from JEPI and 7%+ from Main Street come with equity risk; the payout doesn’t magically make drawdowns go away. Takeaway: income is fine as a priority, but don’t let a few big yielding names justify ignoring position risk and total return.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF 0.35%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%

Costs are suspiciously good. A total TER of about 0.04% is “I accidentally did something right” territory. You’ve mostly used low-cost ETFs from the usual suspects and avoided the classic trap of paying 0.8%+ to underperform a plain index. Fees are like sand in the engine — small grains, big long-term damage — and here you’ve kept most of it out. The only mildly pricey piece is JEPI at 0.35%, but for an option-income approach that’s still reasonable. So yes, mocking is limited here: you managed to assemble a high-drama portfolio without also donating extra returns to fund managers.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey