A growth tilted balanced portfolio with strong US focus and impressively low ongoing costs

Report created on Dec 17, 2025

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The portfolio is 100% in stock ETFs, with 40% in a broad US index, 20% in a tech‑heavy index, and the rest split across dividend, value, growth, and developed international ETFs. Compared with a typical balanced benchmark, which often includes a sizable bond slice, this setup leans more aggressive despite the “balanced” label. That matters because the ride will likely be bumpier, even if long‑term growth potential is high. This structure is very coherent and aligns closely with common US equity allocations, but someone wanting smoother swings could consider gradually adding a stabilizing asset bucket rather than only shuffling between similar equity funds.

Growth Info

Historically, a $10,000 starting amount growing at a 15.19% Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) could end up around $40,000 after 10 years. CAGR is like your average speed on a road trip; even if you hit traffic sometimes, it shows the overall pace. This growth has outpaced what many broad market benchmarks delivered over the long run, which is a strong outcome. The trade‑off is a max drawdown of about –26%, meaning at one point the portfolio was roughly a quarter below a prior peak. That kind of drop is normal for a stock‑heavy setup, but it does test emotional patience, especially in sharp sell‑offs.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs 1,000 “what if” scenarios using historical patterns plus random variation, shows a median outcome of about 548% of today’s value over the simulated period. Monte Carlo is basically a stress test that shakes your portfolio through many alternate futures to see a range of possibilities. The 5th percentile at 118.6% hints that even many weaker paths still end positive, while the higher percentiles show substantial upside. This is encouraging and lines up with the portfolio’s strong growth tilt. Still, all simulations lean on past data and assumptions; real markets can behave differently, so these numbers are rough guideposts, not promises.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All of the money sits in one asset class: stocks. That gives clear growth focus and keeps things simple, and your allocation is well‑balanced within that equity bucket and aligns closely with global standards for diversified stock exposure. However, compared with a more traditional balanced mix that includes bonds or cash, this structure will typically drop more in bear markets. Diversification across asset classes works like mixing ingredients in a recipe: adding something more stable can tone down the spice. If steadier ups and downs are important, slowly introducing a small non‑stock slice over time could help smooth volatility without abandoning the long‑term growth mindset.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    35%
  • Financials
    11%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    11%
  • Telecommunications
    10%
  • Health Care
    9%
  • Industrials
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    6%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector exposure is nicely spread, with 9 meaningful sectors and a clear tilt toward technology at 35%, followed by financials, consumer cyclicals, communication services, and healthcare. This sector mix is quite close to common large‑cap US benchmarks, which is a strong indicator of healthy diversification. The tech and growth orientation has been a big driver of the strong historic performance but can also mean sharper moves when interest rates jump or when growth expectations cool. Some value and dividend exposure already provides a partial counterweight. If future sector swings feel too intense, slightly boosting more defensive or income‑oriented areas within equities could nudge volatility down while keeping the core structure intact.

Regions Info

  • North America
    90%
  • Europe Developed
    6%
  • Japan
    2%
  • Asia Developed
    1%
  • Australasia
    1%

Geographically, about 90% sits in North America, with only 10% spread across developed markets like Europe, Japan, and other developed Asia. This is very much in line with many US‑based investors and has been rewarded in recent years as US markets outperformed much of the world. That said, it does mean results are heavily tied to one region’s fortunes. Global diversification is like not relying on a single employer for all income; if one region struggles, others can help offset it. The current setup is coherent and familiar, but if broader global balance is a future goal, gradually increasing international exposure could help spread geographic risk more evenly.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    41%
  • Large-cap
    38%
  • Mid-cap
    18%
  • Small-cap
    1%

The portfolio leans strongly into mega and big companies (about 79% combined), with a smaller slice in mids and almost nothing in small caps. This mirrors many major benchmarks and provides exposure to well‑established businesses with deep resources and liquidity, which generally helps reduce company‑specific risk. The trade‑off is less participation in smaller, more nimble companies that can sometimes grow faster but swing harder. This large‑cap emphasis is well‑balanced and aligns closely with global standards. If someone wanted a bit more growth potential and diversification of company size, gently tilting a small portion toward mid or smaller companies could broaden the mix without radically changing the risk profile.

Redundant positions Info

  • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    High correlation
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
    Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

The funds tracking broad US markets and growth/tech (the S&P 500, the NASDAQ‑100 ETF, and the US growth ETF) move very similarly, or are “highly correlated.” Correlation is just how often things move in the same direction; if they usually rise and fall together, they don’t add much diversification. The dividend and value ETFs also form another highly correlated group. This overlap is normal when combining broad US funds, but it means some positions are different labels for very similar exposures. Before worrying about complex changes, simplifying overlapping holdings while keeping the same general style (growth, value, dividends) could make the portfolio easier to manage without meaningfully changing its behavior.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk–return chart called the Efficient Frontier, this setup already sits in a strong growth zone for an all‑equity mix using these types of funds. The Efficient Frontier is just the best possible trade‑off line between risk and return given a set of assets, assuming only the weights change. Because many holdings are highly correlated, shifting between them may not move the needle much on that efficiency. The biggest potential improvements would come from reducing overlap, then possibly introducing a small stabilizing bucket if a smoother ride is desired. Efficiency here is about getting the best risk‑return ratio from what’s available, not necessarily ticking every diversification box.

Dividends Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.80%
  • Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares 2.00%
  • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.43%

The overall dividend yield of about 1.43% is modest, reflecting a growth‑oriented equity mix. Yield is the income you receive as a percentage of your investment, like interest on a savings account but from stocks. The dedicated dividend ETF and the value fund provide a higher cash stream, while the growth and tech‑heavy holdings focus more on price appreciation than payouts. This balance works well for someone prioritizing long‑term wealth building over immediate income and is consistent with many growth‑tilted portfolios. If steady cash flow becomes a bigger priority later, gradually nudging more weight toward higher‑yielding holdings could boost income, though often at the cost of a bit of growth potential.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares 0.04%
  • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares 0.04%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.06%

Total ongoing costs around 0.06% per year are impressively low and a real strength here. Fees are like friction on a bike chain: small on any one day but huge over long distances. Being well below typical active fund costs means more of the portfolio’s returns stay in your pocket, which supports better long‑term performance. The mix of Vanguard, Schwab, and Invesco ETFs keeps expenses tight while still giving broad exposure. At this point there’s no pressing need to hunt for cheaper options; the cost structure is already lean and competitive. The bigger impact will likely come from allocation choices rather than squeezing a few more basis points from fees.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey