High growth tilted portfolio with strong technology focus and concentrated sources of risk

Report created on Apr 24, 2026

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

2/5
Low Diversity
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is built almost entirely from four equity ETFs plus a small dedicated bitcoin position. The core is split between a broad US stock market fund, a US growth index, a NASDAQ 100 tracker, and a focused semiconductor ETF, with crypto at 5%. So most of the weight sits in growth-heavy US stocks, with an extra layer of concentration in chips and big tech. Structurally, this is a fairly simple lineup but not very diversified across styles or regions. That kind of concentration can magnify both gains and losses because many holdings are exposed to similar drivers, such as innovation cycles, interest rates, and US equity market sentiment.

Growth Info

Over the recent period, $1,000 grew to about $1,826, implying a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) near 30%. CAGR is like your average speed on a road trip: it smooths out the bumps to show the long-run pace. Compared with both the US and global stock markets, this portfolio returned roughly 9.6 percentage points more per year. The flip side is a maximum drawdown of about -24%, deeper than the benchmarks. Drawdown measures the worst peak-to-trough fall, capturing how painful the rough patches can be. Only 16 days explain 90% of returns, showing results were driven by a small set of very strong days, a pattern common in concentrated growth portfolios.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection uses many simulated future paths based on historical behavior to show a range of potential outcomes. Think of it as rolling the dice 1,000 times on what markets might do, then summarizing the results. The median scenario grows $1,000 to around $2,775 over 15 years, roughly matching an annualized simulated return of 8.15%. But the spread is wide: the middle half of outcomes runs from about $1,814 to $4,321, and the broader 5–95% band ranges from $916 to $7,481. This highlights uncertainty: the same portfolio that can compound well over time can also experience long stretches of weaker or even flat real growth, especially with a growth-and-tech tilt.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    95%
  • Crypto
    5%

Asset-class-wise, about 95% is in stocks and 5% in crypto. That means the portfolio is overwhelmingly driven by equity market movements, with only a small slice tied directly to bitcoin. Stocks are typically the main growth engine in long-term portfolios but can also be volatile, especially when concentrated in specific styles. Crypto usually behaves even more erratically than stocks, sometimes amplifying portfolio swings rather than offsetting them. With no meaningful allocation to traditionally steadier assets such as bonds or cash, there is little structural cushion during broad equity downturns. The payoff is high participation in equity upswings, but the trade-off is living with the full emotional and financial impact of stock market cycles.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    54%
  • Telecommunications
    11%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    9%
  • Health Care
    5%
  • Financials
    5%
  • Industrials
    4%
  • Consumer Staples
    3%
  • Energy
    1%
  • Basic Materials
    1%
  • Real Estate
    1%
  • Utilities
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

The sector breakdown is heavily tilted toward technology at 54%, with the rest spread across areas like telecommunications, consumer discretionary, health care, and financials in much smaller slices. This tech emphasis is stronger than broad-market indices, which usually have a lower technology weight and more balance across sectors. Tech-heavy portfolios often benefit when innovation themes are in favor and interest rates are stable or falling, since future growth is valued more highly. However, they can be hit hard when rates rise or when sentiment turns against high-growth names. The semiconductor ETF adds another layer of sector concentration, tying a big chunk of the portfolio to one particularly cyclical part of the tech ecosystem.

Regions Info

  • North America
    91%
  • Asia Developed
    2%
  • Europe Developed
    2%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Geographically, about 91% of the equity exposure sits in North America, with only small allocations to developed Europe and Asia. That’s a much stronger US tilt than global stock market benchmarks, which spread more across multiple regions. A home-country bias like this can work well when US markets outperform, as they have over much of the last decade. It also concentrates economic, political, and currency risk in one region. Events that specifically affect the US—such as local regulatory changes, fiscal debates, or dollar moves—can ripple through almost the entire portfolio. Limited exposure to other regions means less direct participation if non-US markets lead for a period.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    50%
  • Large-cap
    30%
  • Mid-cap
    12%
  • Small-cap
    2%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

By company size, about half the equity exposure is in mega-cap names, with another 30% in large caps and relatively modest slices in mid, small, and micro caps. This looks more concentrated in the very largest companies than a typical global index, which usually gives a bit more relative weight to mid and smaller firms. Larger companies tend to be more established, with deeper liquidity and more analyst coverage, which can help with stability and transparency. On the other hand, this setup means that a handful of mega-cap stocks can drive a big part of portfolio performance. When these giants do well, the portfolio can feel very strong; when they stumble, the impact can be noticeable.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    11.08%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
    • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Apple Inc
    6.60%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust (BTC)
    5.00%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Bitcoin Trust
  • Microsoft Corporation
    4.97%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Broadcom Inc
    4.27%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
    • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Amazon.com Inc
    3.15%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    3.03%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    2.50%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Meta Platforms Inc.
    2.46%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Tesla Inc
    2.16%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    • LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
    • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Top 10 total 45.21%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Looking through the ETFs, several companies appear multiple times, creating hidden concentration. NVIDIA stands out at around 11% total exposure, while Apple, Microsoft, Broadcom, Amazon, Alphabet (both share classes), Meta, and Tesla all show up as sizable overlapping positions. Because this analysis only covers top-10 ETF holdings, actual overlap is likely somewhat higher. Overlap matters because owning the same company via several funds doesn’t diversify that specific risk; it reinforces it. In practice, this means that news about a few big tech names—especially NVIDIA and other top holdings—can significantly sway the entire portfolio’s daily moves, even though they are not held as single stocks.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
Low
Data availability: 95%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
Neutral
Data availability: 95%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
High
Data availability: 95%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
Neutral
Data availability: 95%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
Low
Data availability: 100%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
Low
Data availability: 95%

Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.

Factor exposure shows a strong tilt toward momentum, with low value, low yield, and low low-volatility scores, and more neutral size and quality. Factors are like underlying “personality traits” of stocks that research links to returns over time. A high momentum tilt means a preference for stocks that have done well recently, which can boost returns in trending markets but may hurt during sharp reversals. Low value and low yield indicate less emphasis on cheaper, income-paying stocks, while low low-volatility means little focus on more stable names. Together, this profile aligns with a growth-oriented, trend-following style that can shine in bull markets but may experience sharper drawdowns when sentiment swings.

Risk contribution Info

  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
    Weight: 20.00%
    30.8%
  • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    Weight: 30.00%
    27.3%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    Weight: 20.00%
    18.4%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Weight: 25.00%
    17.7%
  • iShares Bitcoin Trust
    Weight: 5.00%
    5.8%

Risk contribution data shows that positions don’t influence volatility in line with their weights. The semiconductor ETF, at 20% weight, contributes about 31% of overall portfolio risk—its risk/weight ratio of 1.54 signals it’s a key driver of ups and downs. The dedicated bitcoin slice also contributes more risk than its 5% allocation might suggest. In contrast, the broad US total market ETF carries 25% of the weight but only about 18% of the risk, acting as a relatively stabilizing component. Overall, the three biggest risk contributors account for over three-quarters of total volatility, showing that portfolio behavior is dominated by a few high-octane pieces rather than evenly shared across all holdings.

Redundant positions Info

  • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

The correlation data shows that the NASDAQ 100, the US total market ETF, and the US growth ETF move very closely together. Correlation measures how similarly assets move: values near 1 mean they tend to rise and fall at the same time. When core holdings are highly correlated, owning several of them doesn’t significantly reduce risk during broad market drops, because they all react in similar ways. In this case, the equity sleeve behaves much like a leveraged bet on US growth and tech, rather than a mix of distinctly behaving strategies. That helps explain why the portfolio can outperform strongly in rising markets but still feel very “all-in” when conditions turn rough.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On the risk–return chart, the current portfolio sits below the efficient frontier by about 2 percentage points at its risk level. The efficient frontier represents the best possible return for each level of risk using just these holdings in different weights. The current Sharpe ratio, a measure of return per unit of volatility, is 1.13, compared with 1.41 for the max-Sharpe mix and 1.16 for the minimum-variance mix. This suggests that simply reweighting the same ETFs and crypto—without adding anything new—could slightly improve the balance between risk and reward. Still, the existing allocation already delivers strong absolute returns; the observation is more about fine-tuning efficiency than a structural flaw.

Dividends Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.20%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.54%

The portfolio’s total dividend yield is around 0.54%, which is low compared with broader equity markets that include more mature, income-paying companies. Yield is the cash paid out by holdings each year as a percentage of their price, like interest from a savings account but from stocks. Here, most of the expected return is driven by price movement rather than regular income. That’s consistent with a growth and tech-heavy lineup, where businesses often reinvest profits instead of paying large dividends. In calm or falling markets, lower yield means less built-in cash flow hitting the account, so the portfolio’s value will more directly follow share prices and bitcoin moves.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • iShares Bitcoin Trust 0.12%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares 0.04%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.13%

The weighted average ongoing cost (TER) for this portfolio is about 0.13% per year, which is impressively low. TER, or Total Expense Ratio, is the annual fee charged by funds, taken out invisibly from performance much like a small management fee. Relative to many active or niche strategies, these levels align well with best practices for cost control. Low costs help more of any gross return stay in the portfolio, and that effect compounds over time. Even in a high-growth, concentrated setup like this, keeping fees modest is a positive structural feature, because it leaves the main drivers of results to be asset selection and market behavior, not ongoing expenses.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey