Riding tech fumes and factor gimmicks with a growth label and a very fragile track record
Report created on Jul 4, 2026Risk profile
5/7
Diversification profile
3/5
Positions
-
VT Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
VTI - US9229087690 52.63% -
VX Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
VXUS - US9219097683 21.05% -
AV Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
AVUV - US0250728773 10.53% -
FM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
FMTM 10.53% -
SM VanEck Semiconductor ETF
SMH - US92189F6768 5.26%
This “growth” portfolio is basically one big equity smoothie with a few extra shots of spice. Over half is in a broad US index, another fifth in international stocks, then someone got bored and sprinkled in small-cap value, a focused momentum toy, and a pure-play semiconductor rocket. It looks diversified at first glance, but most roads still lead back to the same global equity engine. With only about 1.3 years of history, this setup is more “early-season pilot episode” than proven series. The structure screams confidence in stocks doing the heavy lifting, with the add-ons mostly turning the volatility knob rather than truly changing the story.
Growth
The performance chart is flattering in the same way a filter is flattering: real, but don’t get attached. A 33.9% CAGR over ~1.3 years and $1,000 morphing into $1,454 looks amazing next to the US and global markets, which it beat by 7–8 percentage points. But that’s a tiny sample size — basically one lucky market regime. Max drawdown of around -14% is respectable, yet with this risk profile that says more about the recent market mood than portfolio genius. Past data over such a short stretch is like judging a restaurant off one good appetizer — not exactly thorough research.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection is trying very hard to sound scientific while leaning on flimsy history. Monte Carlo just means “We shook the historical returns in a blender 1,000 times and looked at the range.” Median outcome of $2,846 over 15 years from $1,000, with a possible range from about $942 to almost $7,978, is basically the model saying “Could be fine, could be wild.” The 76% chance of a positive result looks comforting, but with only 1.3 years feeding the simulation, this is more educated guess than destiny. Yesterday’s weather, extended into a 15-year forecast.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Asset allocation here is gloriously simple and slightly reckless: 100% stocks, 0% anything else. No bonds, no cash buffer, no alternatives — just pure equity beta and vibes. That’s great for clarity and absolutely brutal when markets remember how to fall. Different asset classes are like different types of shock absorbers; this portfolio chose to run the car slammed to the ground because it looks faster. Over a full cycle, all-equity setups can swing very hard, and with only 1.3 years of decent weather in the data, the true downside pain is mostly theoretical so far, not yet fully tested.
Sectors
- Technology 33%
- Financials 15%
- Industrials 12%
- Consumer Discretionary 9%
- Health Care 8%
- Telecommunications 7%
- Energy 5%
- Consumer Staples 4%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector-wise, this has a tech dependency that’s only one energy drink shy of an addiction. Around a third in technology, with more sneaky exposure via semiconductors and big platforms, means a lot of the fate is tied to one broad theme. Financials, industrials, and others show up just enough to claim diversification, but they’re clearly side characters. When tech is hot, this looks brilliant; when tech stumbles, the whole thing limps. Given the short track record, it’s basically been living through a tech-friendly phase — not proof that this setup handles sector rotations gracefully, just that the party’s been in its favorite room.
Regions
- North America 79%
- Europe Developed 8%
- Asia Developed 4%
- Japan 3%
- Asia Emerging 3%
- Australasia 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, this portfolio is running on a heavy North America bias, with about 79% parked there and the rest scattered in small international doses. The overseas holdings are like decorative spices — technically present, but the main flavor is US-centric. That might feel normal to a US-based investor, but it’s still a big philosophical bet that the home market keeps leading the show. The developed and emerging international slices are too small to really change the narrative. With only 1.3 years of evidence, there’s no real test yet of how this home-tilted stance behaves when non-US markets actually take the lead for a while.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 34%
- Large-cap 27%
- Mid-cap 19%
- Small-cap 12%
- Micro-cap 6%
The market cap mix is mostly conventional index world with a side of mischief. Mega- and large-caps dominate, but 12% in small caps and even 6% in micro caps means there’s enough tiny stuff in here to wobble when the wind blows. That small and micro slice is like putting fireworks in the trunk — mostly fine, until it’s not. In calm or momentum-driven markets, this blend can look clever; in real risk-off environments, the little names tend to get smacked first and hardest. The short 1.3-year window hasn’t seen a full “everyone to the exits” stampede to truly showcase that behavior.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 4.29%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AA Apple Inc. 3.32%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 2.42%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.89%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.85%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.61%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.26%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 1.20%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 1.00%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
-
TS Tesla Inc 0.89%
Part of fund(s):- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
- Top 10 total 19.73%
The look-through holdings read like the usual who’s-who of mega-cap glamour: NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Tesla, plus some chip names like Broadcom and Micron. For a portfolio pretending to be broadly diversified, having so much influence from the same handful of giants is a bit on the nose. The catch: only about 29.5% of the portfolio is covered by top-10 data, so the real overlap is likely worse than it looks. It’s a classic index-plus-tilts setup where the same tech darlings are quietly starring in multiple funds, making concentration sneakier than the high-level allocation suggests.
Factors
Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.
Factor-wise, this thing is sending mixed signals. It has very low size exposure, meaning it leans away from smaller companies overall, yet still holds a dedicated small-cap value fund — a bit like ordering a salad with a side of extra fries. Momentum exposure is high, so it’s deliberately or accidentally chasing what’s been working recently. Factor exposure is just the hidden flavor profile that explains why returns move the way they do. A strong momentum tilt plus weaker size emphasis means it loves established winners more than scrappy underdogs, which is great in trending markets and especially unfun when trends reverse hard.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 52.63% 50.3% -
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 21.05% 18.3% -
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
Weight: 10.53% 11.0% -
Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
Weight: 10.53% 10.3% -
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Weight: 5.26% 10.0%
Risk contribution shows who’s actually shaking the boat, and here the usual suspects are in charge. The big Vanguard US and international funds roughly pull their weight in risk, which is fine. The real gremlin is the 5.26% semiconductor position contributing 10% of total risk — almost double its weight. That’s a tiny slice being way too dramatic. The top three positions together drive nearly 80% of portfolio risk, confirming that diversification is more cosmetic than structural. With only 1.3 years of data, this is the mild version; in a proper volatility spike, those risk hogs would likely steal even more of the spotlight.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
The risk/return optimization is politely telling this portfolio it’s leaving money on the table for the risk it’s taking. The current Sharpe ratio of 1.43 sits below both the max-Sharpe and even the minimum-variance option, and it’s about 1.7 percentage points under the efficient frontier at its risk level. Sharpe is just “return per unit of stress.” Being below the frontier means the same holdings, reweighted differently, could theoretically deliver a better tradeoff. With only 1.3 years of input data, the exact numbers are shaky, but the general message stands: this isn’t the most efficient way to assemble the toys already in the box.
Dividends
- Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.30%
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.20%
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.60%
- MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF 0.20%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.29%
The total yield of about 1.29% is firmly in the “don’t quit your day job” category. Income here is clearly an accidental side effect, not a main feature. The international fund tries to be helpful with a somewhat higher yield, while momentum and semiconductors contribute close to pocket change. Dividends are just one way companies return cash, but this setup is clearly banking on price appreciation, not regular payouts. With such a short history, there’s no real pattern in payouts or stability — it’s just a snapshot of a low-yield, growth-leaning equity collection hoping capital gains do the heavy lifting.
Ongoing product costs
- Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.07%
Costs are probably the nicest part of this whole thing. A total TER of around 0.07% is impressively low — like you somehow managed first-class legroom at basic economy prices. The only real fee offenders are the factor toys and the semiconductor ETF, but their higher charges are diluted by the big cheap core index funds. Over decades, fees matter a lot; over 1.3 years, you’d barely notice, but at least the drag isn’t self-inflicted. If something goes wrong with this portfolio, it won’t be because the funds quietly pickpocketed too many basis points along the way.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey