Ultra cautious euro cash focused portfolio with efficient structure but limited long term growth
Report created on May 7, 2024Risk profile
1/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
XE Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C
XEON - LU0290358497 98.00% -
VW Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
VWCE - IE00BK5BQT80 2.00%
The structure is extremely simple: about 98% sits in an ETF tracking the euro overnight rate, with roughly 2% in a global equity ETF. That means almost the entire portfolio behaves like high‑quality cash or a money market position, with only a tiny slice exposed to global stock markets. This kind of mix is very different from a typical long‑term investment portfolio, which usually holds much more in equities to seek growth. The main takeaway is that capital preservation clearly dominates here. Anyone using a setup like this should treat it more like a parking place for money than a vehicle aimed at strong long‑term appreciation.
Growth
Historically, €1,000 grew to about €1,103 over almost seven years, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.47%. CAGR is basically your “average yearly speed” over the full journey. The worst peak‑to‑trough loss, or max drawdown, was only about -1.10%, showing very low volatility compared with global and US markets, which dropped more than -33% at times. The trade‑off is clear: the portfolio lagged the US market by over 11% per year and the global market by about 9% per year. This shows how emphasizing safety significantly reduces both downside pain and upside potential.
Asset classes
- Other 98%
- Stocks 2%
From an asset‑class angle, about 98% sits in “other,” effectively cash‑like exposure to euro overnight rates, with just 2% in stocks. That makes this more like a capital‑preservation or liquidity portfolio than a typical mixed‑asset investment. Cash‑heavy allocations tend to move very little in market downturns, which is comforting, but they also don’t keep up well with long‑term equity growth or potentially inflation. Compared with common benchmarks that hold large allocations to equities and sometimes bonds, this is far more conservative. For someone with long horizons, such a mix protects nominal capital but can quietly erode purchasing power over many years.
Sectors
- Technology 1%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Sector exposure is almost negligible because equities form only 2% of total assets, and the only visible sector slice is about 1% in technology. In a standard diversified equity portfolio, sector splits matter a lot, since tech‑heavy allocations can be more sensitive to interest rates, while others may respond differently to economic cycles. Here, sector risk is essentially muted by the overwhelming cash‑like allocation. The positive point is that there is no problematic overconcentration in any one economic area within the tiny equity part. The main driver of behaviour remains the interest earned on the euro overnight rate rather than sector‑specific news.
Regions
- North America 1%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
On the geographic side, only about 1% is explicitly reported as North America, again reflecting the tiny equity allocation. In a typical global portfolio, geography decisions are critical because heavy concentration in one region can expose you to local economic or political shocks. Here, the main “geographic” risk is actually local interest rates in the euro area, not equity markets abroad. While the equity ETF itself is broadly global, its impact on the overall geographic mix is marginal. The big picture: this approach is very home‑currency anchored, which reduces foreign‑exchange swings but also leans heavily on euro‑area monetary conditions.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 1%
- Large-cap 1%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Market‑cap exposure is split roughly 1% in mega‑caps and 1% in large‑caps, consistent with the global stock ETF’s broad coverage. Market capitalization describes company size; mega‑caps are the very largest firms, while large‑caps are still big, established players. These companies often offer more stability and liquidity than smaller firms, which can be more volatile. In this portfolio, though, the tiny equity share means the usual small vs. large‑cap debates are mostly academic. The comforting point is that the limited stock exposure leans toward robust, globally significant businesses rather than concentrated bets in smaller, more speculative companies.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 0.08%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
AA Apple Inc 0.08%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 0.06%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 0.04%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 0.04%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 0.03%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
AV Broadcom Inc 0.03%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 0.03%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 0.03%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
TS Tesla Inc 0.02%
Part of fund(s):- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- Top 10 total 0.44%
This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.
Looking through the equity ETF, a small part of the overall exposure lands in large global names like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon, though in tiny weights around 0.02–0.08% each. These show that the equity slice is broadly diversified across many companies, but given the overall equity weight of 2%, each stock’s actual impact on total portfolio risk and return is minimal. Overlap between companies is low simply because equity exposure itself is small. The key takeaway is that hidden single‑stock concentration is not a concern here; the dominant driver will always be the euro overnight rate ETF.
Factors
Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.
Factor exposure shows a very strong tilt toward low volatility at 100% and a very low yield exposure at 11%, with all other factors roughly neutral. Factor exposure is like checking which ingredients—such as safety, cheapness, or momentum—dominate your portfolio’s behaviour. A strong low‑volatility tilt fits perfectly with the ultra‑conservative design: returns should be smoother, particularly in market stress. The very low yield factor means the portfolio doesn’t lean on high‑dividend payers for income; instead, stability and cash‑like holdings drive outcomes. Overall, this factor profile is highly aligned with a capital‑preservation mindset and helps explain the historically tiny drawdowns.
Risk contribution
-
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C
Weight: 98.00% 65.9% -
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
Weight: 2.00% 34.1%
Risk contribution looks at how much each holding adds to overall ups and downs, which can differ a lot from simple weights. The cash‑like ETF is 98% of the portfolio but contributes about 66% of total risk, while the 2% global equity ETF accounts for roughly 34% of risk. That’s a classic pattern: even a small slice of equities can dominate volatility because stocks swing much more than cash. This structure is not problematic; it just clarifies that most day‑to‑day movement will come from the equity ETF. If someone wanted even calmer behaviour, shrinking or removing that equity slice would reduce swings further.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk‑return chart, the current portfolio sits right on or very near the efficient frontier, meaning that given these two holdings, the mix is already an efficient trade‑off between risk and expected return. The Sharpe ratio, which compares return to volatility, is negative for the current allocation but higher for the optimal mix that takes on much more risk and return. The minimum‑variance portfolio is only slightly less risky than the current one with a similar return. The key insight: within this very conservative universe, the structure is already efficient. Improving returns meaningfully would require accepting much higher volatility through larger equity weights.
Ongoing product costs
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
- Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C 0.10%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.10%
Costs are impressively low, with a total ongoing fee (TER) around 0.10%. TER is the yearly percentage the fund charges to cover management and operations; lower fees leave more return in your pocket, especially over many years. This level is far below many actively managed products and is fully in line with best practices for cost‑efficient investing. Given the already modest expected returns of cash‑like assets, keeping expenses minimal is particularly important. From a cost perspective, this setup is very well‑designed and supports better long‑term outcomes than a similar risk profile with higher‑fee alternatives.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey