High growth tech focused portfolio with strong historical returns and concentrated semiconductor exposure
Report created on Apr 11, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
Positions
-
SM VanEck Semiconductor ETF
SMH - US92189F6768 50.00% -
VG Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
VGT - US92204A7028 30.00% -
VO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
VOO - US9229083632 20.00%
This portfolio is extremely focused: 100% in stocks, all via three US-listed ETFs. Roughly half sits in a dedicated semiconductor ETF, about a third in a broader technology ETF, and the rest in a large US equity ETF. That structure makes the entire portfolio heavily tilted toward one industry and one country, with only a modest diversifier in the broad market fund. This kind of concentrated growth setup can be powerful when the favored area is doing well but tends to swing harder in both directions. The main takeaway is that the structure favors aggressive growth over balance, so comfort with large ups and downs is essential.
Growth
Historically, performance has been exceptional. From 2016 to 2026, $1,000 grew to about $11,304, giving a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27.54%. CAGR is like the average yearly “speed” of growth over the whole period. This crushed both the US market (14.47% CAGR) and global market (11.98% CAGR). The tradeoff was a max drawdown of about -40%, deeper than the benchmarks’ ~-34%. Drawdown is the worst peak-to-trough drop, and it shows how painful bad periods can feel. The clear message: this setup has been highly rewarding historically, but with noticeably sharper declines.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection uses past returns and volatility to simulate many possible future paths for the portfolio. Think of it as running 1,000 alternate “future histories” to see a range of potential outcomes, not a single forecast. Over 15 years, the median simulation grows $1,000 to about $2,729, with most outcomes between roughly $1,819 and $4,248, and a 74% chance of ending positive. Average simulated annual return is 8.03%, much lower than the backward-looking 27% CAGR. This gap highlights that historical outperformance may not repeat, and simulations still can’t predict new market regimes or extreme events.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
All of the money is in equities, with no allocation to bonds, cash equivalents, or alternative assets. Equities historically offer higher long-term growth potential but also larger short-term swings than more conservative asset classes. Without any buffer from safer assets, portfolio value will move almost entirely with the stock market, especially the segments it’s tilted toward. This 100% stock allocation lines up with a growth-oriented mindset and a longer horizon, but it doesn’t provide natural ballast during deep equity downturns. Anyone wanting smoother ride quality usually blends in some lower-volatility assets alongside stocks.
Sectors
- Technology 86%
- Financials 3%
- Telecommunications 2%
- Consumer Discretionary 2%
- Health Care 2%
- Industrials 2%
- Consumer Staples 1%
- Energy 1%
Sector-wise, this portfolio is overwhelmingly concentrated: about 86% in technology, with only small slivers in financials, telecom, consumer, healthcare, industrials, and energy. Compared to broad benchmarks that spread more evenly across the economy, this is a very focused bet on one sector’s continued strength. Tech-heavy portfolios can perform brilliantly when innovation and earnings growth lead the market, but they are also sensitive to interest rate shifts, regulation, and sentiment around growth stocks. The positive side is clear thematic conviction; the flip side is that sector-specific downturns could hit overall returns much harder than a more balanced mix.
Regions
- North America 90%
- Asia Developed 6%
- Europe Developed 3%
Geographically, around 90% of exposure is to North America, with only modest allocations to developed Asia and Europe. That’s even more US-centric than many global benchmarks, which spread much more across regions. A strong US tilt has been rewarding over the last decade, but it also ties the portfolio heavily to one economy, one policy framework, and largely one currency. Limited exposure to other regions means less benefit if other markets lead in future cycles. The good news is that North America contains many world-leading companies; the tradeoff is less diversification across different economic drivers.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 47%
- Large-cap 37%
- Mid-cap 12%
- Small-cap 3%
- Micro-cap 1%
By market capitalization, this portfolio leans strongly toward the largest companies: about 47% in mega-cap and 37% in large-cap stocks, with smaller pieces in mid, small, and micro caps. That pattern is broadly similar to major indexes, which are dominated by big names. Larger firms tend to be more established and often a bit more resilient than tiny companies, though they can still be volatile, especially in tech. Having at least some exposure to mid and small caps adds growth potential and different behavior patterns, but here they don’t drive the bus. Overall, risk is mostly tied to giant, well-known firms.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 16.57%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AA Apple Inc 6.08%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
TS Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 5.80%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
AV Broadcom Inc 5.65%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 4.11%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-
AM Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.95%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
-
LR Lam Research Corp 2.76%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AM Applied Materials Inc 2.75%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
-
IN Intel Corporation 2.42%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
-
KL KLA Corporation 2.40%
Part of fund(s):- VanEck Semiconductor ETF
- Top 10 total 51.47%
Looking through the ETFs, a handful of big tech and chip names dominate: NVIDIA alone is over 16%, with Apple, TSMC, Broadcom, Microsoft, AMD, and several semiconductor equipment makers each adding a few percent. Many of these show up in more than one ETF, creating hidden concentration even though there are multiple funds. Because only ETF top-10 holdings are captured, actual overlap is probably higher. When the same names drive multiple positions, the portfolio’s fate is tightly tied to those companies’ fortunes. That can be great in boom times but raises the stakes if any of these giants stumble.
Factors
Factor exposure shows a very low tilt to value and low exposure to defensive traits like yield and low volatility. Factors are characteristics like “cheapness” (value) or “price stability” (low volatility) that research has linked to long-run returns. Very low value exposure means the portfolio favors higher-priced, growth-oriented companies over “bargain” stocks. Low low-volatility and low yield suggest a preference for more volatile, low-dividend names. This combo fits a growth-and-innovation style but may lag in environments where investors favor steadier, income-generating or undervalued businesses. Neutral scores on size, momentum, and quality indicate those traits are roughly market-like overall.
Risk contribution
-
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Weight: 50.00% 60.6% -
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 30.00% 27.1% -
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Weight: 20.00% 12.4%
Risk contribution reveals that the semiconductor ETF, at 50% weight, drives about 61% of overall volatility. The broad tech ETF contributes 27% of risk from a 30% weight, while the S&P 500 ETF contributes only 12% of risk despite a 20% weight. Risk contribution measures each holding’s share of the portfolio’s ups and downs, which can differ from simple weight. Here, the chips ETF acts as the main amplifier, while the S&P fund tempers swings. If the goal is to keep a growth tilt but reduce gut-wrenching volatility, adjusting relative sizes of these building blocks is one potential lever.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk–return chart, the current mix sits on or very close to the efficient frontier. The efficient frontier shows the best possible return for each risk level using just these existing holdings. The current Sharpe ratio—a measure of return per unit of risk—is 0.86, while the optimal combination reaches about 1.01 with higher risk and return. The minimum-variance mix delivers lower risk but also much lower return. Being near the frontier means the existing allocation is already using these three funds efficiently for its chosen risk profile. Any changes would be more about personal comfort than fixing inefficiency.
Dividends
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.30%
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
- Weighted yield (per year) 0.40%
Income isn’t a central feature here. The overall dividend yield is about 0.4%, with the semiconductor and tech ETFs yielding roughly 0.3% and 0.1%, and the S&P 500 ETF around 1.1%. Dividend yield is the yearly cash payout as a percentage of price, and it can matter for investors who want regular income or some return cushion in flat markets. In this case, most of the expected payoff is from capital gains rather than cash flows. That aligns with a growth strategy but offers little natural income, so anyone needing cash flow would have to sell shares periodically.
Ongoing product costs
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
- Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.21%
Costs are pleasantly low. The weighted total expense ratio (TER) is about 0.21%, blending a higher-cost niche semiconductor ETF with ultra-low-cost broad ETFs. TER is the annual fee charged by the funds as a percentage of your investment—lower fees mean more of the portfolio’s return stays in your pocket. These levels compare well with typical active funds and are in line with efficient, index-based investing. Keeping costs down is especially important for long-term compounding; even small percentage differences add up over decades. Here, fund selection is doing a solid job of minimizing drag from fees.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey