This portfolio has only about 1 months of historical data, based on the youngest asset in the portfolio. Some metrics, projections, and AI insights may be less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.
Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

Tech tilted global equity portfolio with concentrated risk in a few volatile growth oriented ETFs

Report created on May 6, 2026

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is built entirely from equity ETFs, with a core in broad US and global stocks and a noticeable tilt to technology and leveraged growth. The two broad Vanguard funds hold 60% combined, acting as a diversified base. On top of that, there is a sector-specific tech ETF, a thematic Roundhill Memory ETF, and a 3x leveraged Nasdaq-style ETF. This creates a structure where most holdings are growth-focused, and nothing here is explicitly defensive. With only about a month of history, it’s too early to say how this mix behaves over full market cycles, but the chosen building blocks clearly lean toward capturing equity upside rather than smoothing the ride.

Growth Info

Over the short one‑month window, $1,000 hypothetically grew to about $1,199 in this portfolio, far ahead of both the US and global equity benchmarks. The calculated CAGR of over 700% just reflects this very brief, unusually strong period; it should not be interpreted as a realistic long‑term growth rate. Max drawdown was shallow at around -1.5%, suggesting a smooth ride so far, but one month is not enough to see how it behaves in tougher markets. This strong early performance mainly shows that the portfolio’s growth tilt can amplify gains when markets move favorably, but it says little about future durability.

Projection Info

The 15‑year Monte Carlo projection uses this limited recent history to simulate many possible future paths. Monte Carlo is basically a “what if machine” that runs thousands of random scenarios based on past ups and downs, then summarizes the range of outcomes. Here, the median result turns $1,000 into roughly $2,628, with a wide possible range from about $1,046 to $6,895. An average simulated return near 7.7% per year looks reasonable for equities, but because the input data covers only a month, the model has a shaky foundation. These figures are best seen as rough illustrations of uncertainty, not precise forecasts.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    85%
  • No data
    15%

The asset class view shows 85% in stocks and 15% tagged as “no data,” which simply means the system lacks a clear label for that portion. Everything with a defined label here is equity, so the portfolio functions as an almost pure stock portfolio. Equity-heavy mixes typically offer higher long‑term growth potential but also larger swings in value, especially during market downturns. With no explicit allocation to bonds or cash in the labeled data, there is little natural cushioning built in. Given the one‑month window, actual long‑run volatility cannot yet be seen, but the structure itself points to a growth‑oriented, return‑seeking profile.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    36%
  • Financials
    10%
  • Industrials
    7%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    7%
  • Telecommunications
    6%
  • Health Care
    6%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is led by technology at 36%, with the rest spread across financials, industrials, consumer areas, telecoms, health care, and others. This level of tech weight is noticeably higher than typical broad market indices, reflecting the dedicated tech and memory ETFs and the leveraged Nasdaq exposure. Tech-heavy portfolios often benefit when innovation and growth stories lead the market but can feel more pressure during rate hikes or periods when investors favor steadier, cash‑generating businesses. The remaining sectors are fairly well distributed, which helps diversification, yet the overall behavior will likely be dominated by tech trends rather than the smaller sector allocations.

Regions Info

  • North America
    66%
  • Europe Developed
    8%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Asia Emerging
    3%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, about two thirds of the portfolio sits in North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, other Asian regions, and smaller slices in emerging markets plus Australasia and Africa/Middle East. This is broadly in line with global equity benchmarks, which are also heavily tilted toward North America, especially the US. That alignment is a positive sign for diversification: the portfolio participates in a wide range of economies rather than being tied to a single country. At the same time, the strong tech and US tilt mean that US market and dollar movements will still play an outsized role in overall returns.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    35%
  • Large-cap
    24%
  • Mid-cap
    13%
  • Small-cap
    5%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

Some holdings may not have full classification data available. Percentages may not add up to 100%.

Market capitalization exposure is concentrated in mega‑cap and large‑cap companies, together just under 60% of the portfolio. Mid‑caps and small‑caps add some breadth, with a smaller slice in micro‑caps. This pattern is similar to many global indices, where the largest companies dominate the total market value. Bigger firms often bring more stability and liquidity, while smaller ones can be more volatile but sometimes offer faster growth. Having a spectrum across sizes can help balance these characteristics. In practice, given the growth and tech tilt, the portfolio’s day‑to‑day moves will likely be driven most by large, high‑profile companies even with smaller caps present.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    5.69%
    Part of fund(s):
    • ProShares UltraPro QQQ
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Apple Inc
    5.03%
    Part of fund(s):
    • ProShares UltraPro QQQ
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Microsoft Corporation
    3.50%
    Part of fund(s):
    • ProShares UltraPro QQQ
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Broadcom Inc
    1.73%
    Part of fund(s):
    • ProShares UltraPro QQQ
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Amazon.com Inc
    1.48%
    Part of fund(s):
    • ProShares UltraPro QQQ
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    1.23%
    Part of fund(s):
    • ProShares UltraPro QQQ
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    0.99%
    Part of fund(s):
    • ProShares UltraPro QQQ
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Meta Platforms Inc.
    0.93%
    Part of fund(s):
    • ProShares UltraPro QQQ
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Tesla Inc
    0.80%
    Part of fund(s):
    • LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
    • ProShares UltraPro QQQ
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
    0.69%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Top 10 total 22.07%

Looking through ETF top holdings, a few names stand out: NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Broadcom, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Tesla, and Taiwan Semiconductor. These appear across multiple ETFs, creating hidden concentration where the same company is owned via different funds. For instance, NVIDIA alone accounts for roughly 5.7% of the portfolio in aggregate. Because this look‑through only covers ETF top‑10 positions, actual overlap is likely higher than shown. This kind of overlap means portfolio behavior is closely tied to a relatively small set of large tech and growth companies, even though the surface‑level ETF list looks broadly diversified.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
No data
Data availability: 0%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
Very low
Data availability: 85%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
No data
Data availability: 0%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
No data
Data availability: 0%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 85%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 85%

Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.

Factor data is limited, but one notable signal is a very low score on the size factor. Factor exposure is like checking which “traits” the portfolio leans into, such as cheapness (value), small size, or stability. A very low size exposure means a strong tilt away from smaller companies and toward larger ones. That fits with the visible dominance of mega‑ and large‑caps and the presence of big tech leaders. In general, this can mean the portfolio may move more in line with headline large‑cap indices and be less sensitive to small‑cap rallies. With many factors showing “no data,” deeper conclusions would be speculative for now.

Risk contribution Info

  • Roundhill Memory ETF
    Weight: 15.00%
    33.1%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Weight: 40.00%
    20.7%
  • ProShares UltraPro QQQ
    Weight: 10.00%
    19.1%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
    Weight: 20.00%
    16.5%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    Weight: 15.00%
    10.6%

Risk contribution shows how much each holding drives the portfolio’s overall ups and downs, which can be very different from its weight. Here, the Roundhill Memory ETF is 15% of the portfolio but contributes about a third of total risk, more than double its share by weight. The leveraged ProShares UltraPro QQQ is 10% by weight yet accounts for about 19% of risk. Together with the broad US fund, the top three holdings drive nearly 73% of total risk. This highlights that volatility is concentrated in a few growth‑oriented positions, so their behavior will strongly shape the portfolio’s experience even though other funds are present.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

The efficient frontier analysis compares this portfolio’s risk/return mix to the best combinations achievable using the same holdings. The current portfolio sits below the efficient frontier by about 34 percentage points at its risk level, with a Sharpe ratio of 9.89 versus 11.75 for the “optimal” mix and 9.64 for the minimum‑variance mix. The Sharpe ratio is a way of judging how much return you get per unit of risk taken. Being below the frontier means, in theory, different weights among these same ETFs could achieve better risk‑adjusted performance. That said, these figures are based on just one month of data, so optimization results should be treated as very provisional.

Dividends Info

  • ProShares UltraPro QQQ 0.50%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.09%

The overall dividend yield is about 1.09%, with the highest yield coming from the international equity ETF and modest yields from the US broad market ETF. The tech and leveraged funds offer relatively low income, which is common for growth‑oriented and leveraged products that focus more on price movement than cash payouts. A yield around 1% means dividends are a minor, but not zero, part of total return; most of the expected outcome will come from price changes. With only a month of history, the exact income pattern isn’t visible yet, but the current fund mix points clearly toward growth rather than income orientation.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • ProShares UltraPro QQQ 0.88%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.12%

The blended total expense ratio of the portfolio is about 0.12%, which is impressively low given the presence of a leveraged ETF at 0.88%. The bulk of assets sit in very low‑cost Vanguard index funds with fees between 0.03% and 0.10%, keeping the overall average down. Costs matter because they are deducted every year regardless of performance, and even small differences compound over long periods. This fee level is broadly competitive with many passive equity strategies and supports better long‑term outcomes compared with higher‑fee structures. With such limited performance history, low ongoing costs are one of the clearest structural advantages visible today.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey