A highly concentrated all stock portfolio focused on aggressive growth with elevated downside risk

Report created on Nov 12, 2024

Risk profile Info

7/7
Speculative
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

2/5
Low Diversity
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is 100% in stocks, mostly broad US large cap, plus focused tilts to small value and two niche themes. That means there’s zero ballast from bonds or cash, and a big overlap between the large cap growth fund and the S&P 500 fund. Structure like this usually behaves a lot like a growth‑tilted US index, but with extra bumps from the more specialized ETFs. This alignment with common benchmarks is good for transparency and tracking, but concentration raises risk. To smooth the ride a bit, shifting a slice toward stabilizing assets or broader diversified funds could help without fully giving up the growth orientation.

Growth Info

The reported historical numbers (CAGR above 200% and all Monte Carlo paths going to ‑100%) clearly look broken or mis‑calculated, so they shouldn’t be trusted. In normal reality, a mix of US large cap growth, S&P 500, and small cap value would likely have delivered strong but volatile returns, especially around major market corrections. Historic performance is useful to understand how sharp past drawdowns were, but it never guarantees future outcomes. It’s better to focus on realistic long‑term averages, such as single‑digit or low double‑digit annual returns, when stress‑testing how this aggressive setup might behave in different market cycles.

Projection Info

Monte Carlo simulation takes past return and volatility data, scrambles it thousands of times, and builds a range of possible future paths. It’s like running many alternate histories to see best‑, middle‑, and worst‑case scenarios. Here, the output showing every path ending at ‑100% is clearly a data or input error, not a meaningful forecast. In a sensible simulation, a portfolio this aggressive would usually show a wide range of outcomes, with big upside potential but deep downside tails. For planning, it’s more useful to look at whether one can emotionally and financially handle large dips suggested by more realistic projections.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All assets here are in a single asset class: equities. That pure‑equity stance aligns with a speculative risk profile and maximizes growth potential, but it also maximizes exposure to stock‑market swings. In more balanced lineups, adding bonds, cash, or other diversifiers can reduce the size of drawdowns without completely killing long‑term returns. This allocation is intentionally aggressive and matches a high‑risk benchmark style, but it leaves little room for stability during crashes. For anyone wanting to dial down volatility while still aiming for growth, nudging a portion into steadier asset classes could materially soften the worst‑case periods.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    30%
  • Financials
    19%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    16%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Health Care
    7%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Consumer Staples
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%
  • Utilities
    1%

Sector exposure is tilted toward technology, financials, and consumer cyclicals, amplified by the dedicated capital markets and homebuilder funds. That setup leans into economically sensitive areas that can surge in expansions but get hit hard in recessions or rate shocks. The tech weight is similar to many modern benchmarks, which is actually a good sign for alignment with broad markets. However, the thematic ETFs add extra concentration risk. When rate hikes or housing slowdowns happen, those pieces may swing wildly. Trimming some of the narrow sector funds in favor of broader, sector‑balanced holdings could keep growth potential while reducing single‑theme shocks.

Regions Info

  • North America
    98%
  • Europe Developed
    2%

Geographic exposure is almost entirely in North America, with only a sliver in developed Europe via the global ETF. This US‑heavy pattern matches many domestic benchmarks and has been rewarded over the last decade, which is a positive alignment with recent market leadership. The flip side is reliance on one region’s economy, politics, and currency. If US stocks underperform global peers for a stretch, this concentration would feel painful. Some investors prefer to spread bets more across different regions so that local issues don’t dominate outcomes. Gradually increasing non‑US exposure through broad global funds could improve resilience without overcomplicating the lineup.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    40%
  • Large-cap
    23%
  • Mid-cap
    16%
  • Small-cap
    14%
  • Micro-cap
    8%

Market cap exposure runs from mega‑caps down to micro‑caps, which is actually a nice spread for an all‑equity setup. The large and mega‑cap allocations provide stability and liquidity similar to major benchmarks, while the small and micro segment introduces extra growth potential and risk. Historically, smaller companies can swing more and may take longer to recover after downturns, but they also sometimes outperform over long horizons. This mix is well‑aligned with a growth‑oriented style, but the added small and micro exposure means drawdowns can be steeper. Anyone preferring a smoother ride could scale back the smallest‑cap tilt and lean more on broad large‑cap funds.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a simple risk‑return chart (the Efficient Frontier), which shows the best possible return for each level of volatility using only the current building blocks, this portfolio sits toward the high‑risk end. Efficient Frontier just means “best trade‑off between risk and reward,” not “most diversified” or “safest.” Because everything here is equity and heavily US‑biased, the main adjustment levers are how much to put in broad market funds versus niche tilts. Shifting weight away from the concentrated sector and factor pieces toward the broad, low‑cost core could move the mix closer to an efficient balance without changing the underlying growth focus.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.60%
  • iShares Global 100 ETF 0.90%
  • SPDR® S&P Capital Markets ETF 1.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
  • SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • SPDR® S&P Homebuilders ETF 0.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.92%

The overall dividend yield is under 1%, which fits an aggressive, growth‑focused equity mix. Growth‑oriented companies and sectors often reinvest profits into expansion rather than paying them out as dividends. A few components, like small cap value and financials, bump income slightly, which is a small bonus. For someone prioritizing long‑term capital appreciation, this lower yield is not a problem and often expected. For anyone needing cash flow, though, this setup would likely require selling shares to generate spending money. Blending in some higher‑yielding, stable holdings could increase income, but it would also tilt away from pure growth.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • iShares Global 100 ETF 0.41%
  • SPDR® S&P Capital Markets ETF 0.35%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
  • SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 ETF 0.02%
  • SPDR® S&P Homebuilders ETF 0.35%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.15%

The blended cost (TER around 0.15%) is impressively low for such a specialized, growth‑oriented equity mix. Low fees matter because they come off returns every year, and over long periods even small differences compound into noticeable gaps. The broad market ETFs are especially cheap and help drag down the total cost despite the pricier niche and factor funds. This cost profile aligns well with best practices and supports better long‑term performance compared to many actively managed alternatives. Keeping this low‑fee mindset while making any future tweaks is a strong habit that can meaningfully improve net returns over time.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey