Global equity tripod with strong developed tilt and efficient low cost building blocks
Report created on Apr 9, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
3/5
Positions
-
MW Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF DR USD Acc
MWRE - IE000BI8OT95 80.00% -
IS iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS
IS3N - IE00BKM4GZ66 10.00% -
IU iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
IUSN - IE00BF4RFH31 10.00%
The portfolio is a clean three-fund global equity setup: a broad developed-world core at 80%, complemented by 10% emerging markets and 10% global small caps. Everything is in stock ETFs, with no bonds or cash buffer. This creates a straightforward “all-growth” structure that’s easy to understand and manage. A pure equity mix can compound well over long horizons but tends to swing more during market stress. With only roughly 1.4 years of data, it’s too early to judge long-term behavior, yet the structure itself is textbook for a simple global approach. The main takeaway is that risk is driven entirely by global stock markets, with no built‑in stabilizers.
Growth
Over the short 2024‑11 to 2026‑04 window, €1,000 grew to about €1,143, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.92%. CAGR is like average speed on a road trip, smoothing out bumps along the way. The portfolio slightly trailed the global equity benchmark but beat the US market benchmark, and its maximum drawdown—about -21.5%—was similar to global markets. Just five days accounted for 90% of returns, showing how a handful of strong days drove most gains. Because 1.4 years is a very limited sample, these numbers shouldn’t be read as “normal” behavior, only as a glimpse of how the mix handled one specific period.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection uses the limited historical data to simulate 1,000 possible 15‑year paths, like rolling the dice on future market returns many times. It suggests a median outcome of about €2,678 from €1,000, with a wide “likely” range between roughly €1,782 and €4,032, and an overall average annualized return near 8%. There’s an estimated 83% chance of ending with more than the starting amount. However, because the input history is just 1.4 years, these simulations rest on shaky ground; they mainly reflect recent conditions. The key takeaway is that outcomes are highly uncertain and can vary dramatically, even if long‑term odds tilt positive.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
All assets here are equities, with 100% in stocks and 0% in bonds, cash, or alternatives. That’s a much higher equity allocation than what many balanced or “middle‑of‑the‑road” portfolios use, where bonds often play a cushioning role. Being fully in stocks typically boosts long‑run growth potential but also amplifies volatility, especially during sharp market downturns. Over a long horizon and for someone comfortable with significant ups and downs, an all‑equity mix can make sense. Yet for shorter timelines or lower risk tolerance, adding other asset classes is usually how investors smooth the ride. The main implication is that this setup leans more toward growth than the word “balanced” might suggest.
Sectors
- Technology 26%
- Financials 16%
- Industrials 12%
- Consumer Discretionary 10%
- Health Care 9%
- Telecommunications 8%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Energy 5%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Utilities 3%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector exposure is led by technology at about 26%, followed by financials, industrials, and consumer‑oriented areas, with smaller slices in energy, utilities, and real estate. This pattern is broadly in line with global equity benchmarks today, which are also tech‑heavy. Tech and related growth sectors often drive returns during low‑rate or innovation‑friendly periods but can be more sensitive when interest rates rise or sentiment flips. The positive here is that the sector mix looks well aligned with broad global standards, supporting diversification across economic themes. The trade‑off is that short‑term results will be influenced by how large tech and growth names behave, both on the upside and during corrections.
Regions
- North America 66%
- Europe Developed 15%
- Japan 6%
- Asia Developed 5%
- Asia Emerging 4%
- Australasia 2%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, the portfolio is anchored in North America at around 66%, with meaningful exposure to developed Europe and smaller allocations to Japan, other developed Asia, and emerging regions. This is quite close to typical global market‑cap weights, where US and Canadian markets dominate. That alignment is beneficial: it means the portfolio is not making big active bets on any one region beyond what global markets already represent. However, it also means results will be heavily tied to North American policy, currency, and corporate trends. The emerging allocation is modest, so its higher growth potential and higher risk have only a limited impact on the overall behavior.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 44%
- Large-cap 31%
- Mid-cap 18%
- Small-cap 6%
- Micro-cap 1%
By market cap, there is a clear tilt toward mega‑ and large‑cap companies, together making up about 75% of exposure. Mid‑caps, small‑caps, and a small slice of micro‑caps round out the rest, with the small‑cap ETF giving a focused boost to the smaller end. Large companies often bring more stability, stronger balance sheets, and deeper liquidity, which can help during stress. Smaller firms can offer higher growth potential but usually come with bumpier price swings and more sensitivity to economic shifts. This mix is broadly similar to global equity indexes, with a deliberate nudge toward small caps, which may add diversification but can also slightly raise volatility relative to a pure large‑cap allocation.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 4.04%
Part of fund(s):- Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF DR USD Acc
-
AA Apple Inc 3.68%
Part of fund(s):- Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF DR USD Acc
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 2.61%
Part of fund(s):- Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF DR USD Acc
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.89%
Part of fund(s):- Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF DR USD Acc
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.70%
Part of fund(s):- Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF DR USD Acc
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.43%
Part of fund(s):- Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF DR USD Acc
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.35%
Part of fund(s):- Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF DR USD Acc
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 1.32%
Part of fund(s):- Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF DR USD Acc
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1.16%
Part of fund(s):- iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS
-
TS Tesla Inc 1.07%
Part of fund(s):- Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF DR USD Acc
- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- Top 10 total 20.25%
Looking through ETF top holdings, the largest underlying exposures are familiar mega-cap names, with NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft together already over 10% of the visible slice. Many of these companies appear in multiple ETFs, so overlap creates hidden concentration, especially in the big global core fund. Because only ETF top‑10s are included, true overlap is almost certainly higher than shown. This is common in broad index portfolios and not necessarily a problem, but it does mean short‑term results can be more influenced by a handful of giants than by the thousands of smaller positions underneath. The key point: diversification by number of holdings doesn’t fully protect from concentration in a few dominant companies.
Risk contribution
-
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF DR USD Acc
Weight: 80.00% 80.7% -
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
Weight: 10.00% 10.6% -
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS
Weight: 10.00% 8.7%
Risk contribution shows how much each holding drives overall ups and downs, not just how big it is in euros. Here, the core developed‑world ETF is 80% of the weight and contributes about 81% of total risk, very much in line with its size. The small‑cap ETF contributes slightly more risk than its 10% weight, reflecting small caps’ bumpier behavior, while the emerging markets ETF contributes slightly less than its 10% share. All three together account for essentially 100% of portfolio risk, which matches the three‑fund structure. The helpful point is that there’s no hidden single‑fund risk concentration beyond what the headline weights already show.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk–return chart, the current mix has a Sharpe ratio of 0.53, below both the minimum‑variance and maximum‑Sharpe portfolios available from the same three ETFs. The Sharpe ratio compares excess return to volatility, like measuring how much “reward” you get per unit of “bumpiness.” Being about 2.8 percentage points below the efficient frontier means that, based on the limited historical window, a different weighting of the same funds could have delivered better risk‑adjusted results. With only 1.4 years of data, this isn’t a definitive verdict, but it suggests there’s some room for fine‑tuning weights if the goal is to squeeze more efficiency from this exact toolkit without adding new holdings.
Ongoing product costs
- iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS 0.18%
- iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR 0.35%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.05%
Costs look impressively low. The overall TER—total expense ratio—is around 0.05%, which is extremely lean for a fully global three‑ETF structure. TER is the annual fee charged by the funds, taken directly from their assets, so lower costs mean more of any return stays in the portfolio each year. Over long periods, even small fee differences compound into meaningful amounts. This allocation is well‑aligned with best practices for cost control and compares favorably to many actively managed or higher‑fee solutions. With such a low cost drag, performance will mainly depend on market behavior and asset mix rather than fees quietly eating into results.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey