One ETF to rule them all and hope the Nasdaq never has a bad decade
Report created on Mar 19, 2026Risk profile
5/7
Diversification profile
2/5
Positions
-
QQ Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM - US46138G6492 100.00%
This “portfolio” is not really a portfolio; it is a single‑ETF dare. One fund at 100% is the investing version of eating only pizza every day: it can be amazing for a while, but you are one bad batch away from regretting your life choices. There is zero internal balance here — no cushion, no counterweight, no plan B. It works only as long as this one growth index keeps winning. A more deliberate structure usually spreads risk across different return drivers so that when one theme sulks, another one quietly picks up the slack. Here, everything either parties together or crashes together.
Growth
Historically, this thing has absolutely flown: a 16.1% CAGR is “hero numbers” territory. CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) is just your average annual speed over the whole trip, potholes included. But that max drawdown of about -35% is the reminder that the roller coaster does in fact go down. That drop is big enough to scare many people into bailing at precisely the worst time. Also, this is one specific slice of history dominated by mega‑cap growth darlings; it is not a law of nature. Past data is like yesterday’s weather: useful context, terrible crystal ball. The lesson: fantastic returns rarely come with gentle ride quality.
Projection
The Monte Carlo results are hilariously optimistic at first glance: median outcome around +533% total (633% of starting value) and a chunky 17% simulated annual return. Monte Carlo is just a fancy way of saying “we rolled the dice 1,000 times using past volatility and return patterns to see a range of futures.” The scary part: in the bad 5% of cases, you end up at about 82% of your starting value — years of zero or negative real progress. And all of this still leans heavily on the idea that the future vaguely rhymes with the past, which is a heroic assumption for one concentrated growth index.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Asset allocation here is delightfully simple and slightly reckless: 100% stocks, 0% everything else. No bonds, no cash buffer, no diversifying “boring stuff.” It is pure risk‑on mode. For someone with a very long horizon and strong stomach, that can be fine; for anyone who needs stability, this is asking for emotional damage during big drawdowns. Different asset classes behave like different instruments in a band — some loud, some steady, some weird. You have picked only the electric guitar and cranked it to 11. The takeaway: this setup is built for growth or pain, nothing in between.
Sectors
- Technology 51%
- Telecommunications 16%
- Consumer Discretionary 13%
- Consumer Staples 8%
- Health Care 5%
- Industrials 3%
- Utilities 2%
- Basic Materials 1%
- Energy 1%
Sector mix: roughly 51% tech, 16% communication services, 13% consumer cyclicals, with small scraps in defensive and industrial areas. This is basically “Tech and Friends: The ETF.” Financials and real estate are basically rounding errors. When tech and growth narratives are hot, this feels genius; when they are not, this feels like hugging a live wire. Sector balance in broader portfolios helps smooth different economic cycles — here the cycle is simple: if innovation is beloved, you are golden; if markets rotate to dull-but-steady themes, you are the one holding the bag. That sector tilt is a bet, whether intended or not.
Regions
- North America 98%
- Europe Developed 1%
Geographically, you are 98% North America with a sad 1% in developed Europe and effectively nothing elsewhere. This is the classic “USA or nothing” mindset. To be fair, a lot of global business revenue still comes from everywhere via these multinationals, but ownership is heavily concentrated in one market, one currency, and one political regime. That works brilliantly when the U.S. is leading the charge and less so when other regions have their day in the sun. Global diversification exists precisely to avoid betting your entire future on one country’s policy, market mood, and central bank decisions. You opted to skip that hedge.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 55%
- Large-cap 33%
- Mid-cap 11%
Market‑cap split? Mega caps 55%, big caps 33%, and a small 11% in mid caps. Translation: you are almost entirely riding the biggest names in the room. These giants are stable until they are not — when sentiment turns on a mega‑cap, the size just means the pain is widespread. There is almost no exposure to smaller or earlier‑stage companies that might zig when the giants zag. Instead, you are tied to the fate of a small club of massive corporations whose prices already bake in high expectations. You are not hunting for undiscovered gems; you are doubling down on the most crowded trade in the market.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 8.72%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
AA Apple Inc 7.36%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 5.85%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 4.42%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
TS Tesla Inc 3.89%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 3.59%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 3.50%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
WM Walmart Inc. Common Stock 3.40%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 3.25%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-
AV Broadcom Inc 3.03%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
- Top 10 total 47.01%
Looking through the ETF, the top exposures are exactly the usual suspects: NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla, Meta, Alphabet, Broadcom, plus a token non‑tech name or two. It is basically a fan club for the market’s current celebrities. Overlap is massive because you are holding a single index — the same giants show up across the top weights, and they all tend to move to the same macro music. There is hidden concentration in style too: high‑growth, story‑driven names that investors love when times are good and punish hard when sentiment flips. Translation: this is not diversified genius; it is one very large, very shiny cluster bet.
Factors
Factor exposure is a bit of a circus: strong momentum (about 56%), decent low volatility (around 50%), and some value at 25%. Factor exposure is basically the “ingredient list” behind performance — growth vs cheap vs trendy vs stable. Momentum plus low volatility is a strange combo: you are chasing what has worked while also pretending it is relatively calm. That calmness is relative, by the way; a -35% drawdown is not exactly a spa day. Limited data on size, quality, and yield just screams “we like winners and do not ask too many questions about their fundamentals.” This portfolio loves trends and is only mildly interested in whether they are reasonably priced.
Risk contribution
-
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Weight: 100.00% 100.0%
Risk contribution is boringly simple: one ETF, 100% of the risk. Risk contribution shows which positions actually drive the portfolio’s ups and downs — usually surprising, but here it is perfectly literal. If this thing tanks, there is nowhere to hide; if it rallies, everything rallies together. There are no sneaky small positions secretly swinging the whole portfolio, just one big lever. The only lever for changing risk is position size in this single ETF or adding others. For most people, that means that any future “risk management” conversation will basically be: dial this one holding up or down, or finally invite other players to the party.
Dividends
- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
- Weighted yield (per year) 0.50%
Dividend yield around 0.5% is basically a polite “don’t expect much income.” This is a capital‑growth, not income, vehicle. Dividends are the slow, boring paycheck of investing; here, you are instead banking on price going up and compounding over time. That can be powerful, but it also means you are fully dependent on market enthusiasm for growth stories instead of predictable cash being handed out. For anyone dreaming of living off yield, this would be like trying to fund retirement off tips from a coffee shop jar — technically possible, practically delusional. This setup screams “reinvest everything and hope the music does not stop soon.”
Ongoing product costs
- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.15%
Costs are actually the one refreshingly sane part: a 0.15% TER is low, especially for such a concentrated, branded index. TER (Total Expense Ratio) is the annual fee quietly siphoned off — like a subscription cost for owning the fund. You are at the “discount” end of the spectrum, which is nice because at least you are not overpaying to take this much risk. It is almost suspiciously reasonable: all the risk, all the volatility, and at least the manager is not charging luxury-car fees to sit in the same roller coaster seat as everyone else.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey