Roast mode 🔥

A yield chaser portfolio trying to be balanced while secretly cosplaying as a growth addict

Report created on Dec 21, 2025

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This mix looks like it was built by committee: “I love dividends, but also growth, and sure throw in some bonds.” With 45% in a dividend ETF and 30% in mega-cap growth, it’s basically two giant bets with some international and tax-exempt bonds duct-taped on for respectability. A “balanced” label with 90% stocks is like calling a sports car “family friendly” because it has a trunk. Typical balanced portfolios sit closer to 60–70% stocks, not 90%. If this is meant for long-term growth, fine, but be honest about it and consider either more bonds or more global and factor diversification instead of just two big equity pillars.

Growth Info

A 12.95% CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) is strong. CAGR is basically your average speed over a crazy road trip, ignoring every bump. Starting with $10k, you’d hypothetically be near $33k after 10 years at that pace. But the -30.7% max drawdown is the part that hurts: that’s “check your account and immediately close the app” territory. Broad equity benchmarks like the S&P 500 have seen similar hits, so you’ve been riding an aggressive equity wave, not discovering magic. Past data is yesterday’s weather: useful but not psychic. Use these numbers as a sanity check, not a security blanket, and ask if you can actually stomach another -30% when it shows up again.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo results are shouting: “Probably fine, but don’t get cocky.” Monte Carlo is basically a thousand alternate-universe market paths rolled with digital dice. Median outcome of +282% and average simulated return around 11.3% is solid, but the 5th percentile at +36% shows the “bad but not catastrophic” world. That still means a decade-plus of risk where returns could be meh compared to your expectations. Simulations lean heavily on historical behavior, and markets don’t sign contracts to repeat the past. If this setup is for long-term growth, it’s plausible. If it’s meant to fund anything within 5–7 years, consider dialing down volatility or building a separate, safer bucket.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    90%
  • Bonds
    10%
  • Cash
    1%

“Balanced profile” with 90% in stocks and 10% in bonds is like calling hot sauce a vegetable. You’ve got a token 10% in tax-exempt bonds trying to calm down a very equity-forward party. For someone truly balanced, you’d normally see a larger stabilizer chunk in bonds or other lower-volatility assets. Right now, the bonds are more decorative than functional in a crash; a 10% cushion doesn’t do much when stocks take a 30–40% dive. If the goal is real balance, consider beefing up the defensive side or at least carving out more for lower-volatility, income-oriented holdings that actually move differently from stocks.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    24%
  • Health Care
    11%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    10%
  • Energy
    9%
  • Consumer Staples
    9%
  • Financials
    9%
  • Industrials
    7%
  • Telecommunications
    7%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector-wise, this portfolio clearly has a tech crush at 24%, with healthcare and consumer names tagging along like responsible friends. There’s a reasonable spread across most areas, but this isn’t exactly neutral — it leans toward the usual “U.S. large-cap growth plus dividend favorites” party. Energy at 9% and financials at 9% add some cyclical spice, but nothing here screams originality. The risk is that when U.S. tech and growth stumble, a lot of this will feel it at the same time. Consider slowly nudging toward a more even sector balance so that one disappointing earnings season doesn’t drag the entire thing through the mud.

Regions Info

  • North America
    76%
  • Europe Developed
    6%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Japan
    2%
  • Asia Developed
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geographically, this is “America first and second and maybe a few others if they behave.” With 76% in North America and only 15% or so sprinkled across the rest of the world, it’s basically a U.S. bet wearing a thin international jacket. Surprising twist: at least there is some international allocation — more than many U.S.-only setups — so mild applause for that. But it’s still nowhere near global market weight, which is closer to a 60/40-ish U.S./ex-U.S. split. The risk is simple: if the U.S. underperforms for a decade, this whole plan does too. Gradual increases in foreign exposure could reduce the “USA or bust” vibe.

Market capitalization Info

  • Large-cap
    39%
  • Mega-cap
    28%
  • Mid-cap
    18%
  • Small-cap
    3%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

Market-cap mix says “I trust the giants.” With 67% in mega and big caps and only crumbs in small and micro caps, this is a very establishment-heavy portfolio. That’s fine for stability relative to the stock market overall, but it means less exposure to the higher-risk, higher-reward small-cap world that often juices long-term returns. You’re basically hanging out with the corporate blue bloods and avoiding the scrappy upstarts. Not necessarily bad, but a bit bland. If long-term growth is the real goal and volatility is already accepted, a slightly larger slice in smaller companies could improve diversification instead of just doubling down on the usual mega names.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

From a risk–return angle, this portfolio is basically standing left of center on the Efficient Frontier but flexing like it’s optimal. The Efficient Frontier is just a fancy way of saying “the best trade-off between risk and reward for a given mix.” With 90% equities and only modest diversification, you’re taking nearly full-equity risk with a slightly nicer yield and a small bond pillow. That can be fine if long-term growth is the priority and volatility is tolerable. But it’s not exactly wringing every drop of efficiency from the risk you’re taking. A more intentional blend of growth, defensive assets, and true diversification could push you closer to that sweet-spot curve.

Dividends Info

  • Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.80%
  • Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF Shares 3.30%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 1.40%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 2.37%

The dividend angle is doing some heavy lifting at first glance: a 2.37% total yield anchored by a nearly 4% from the dividend ETF and tax-exempt bond income. But let’s be clear: this is not an income machine; it’s a growth-and-income hybrid pretending to be more conservative than it is. Relying on dividends alone for stability is like relying on cupholders for car safety. Payouts can get cut, and prices still swing. Dividends are nice — and the tax-exempt bond income is a thoughtful touch — but anyone planning to live off this in the near term will want more reliable, less volatile sources of cash flow.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares 0.07%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.06%

Costs are the one area where this setup looks suspiciously competent. A total expense ratio around 0.06% is basically index-fund-level cheap — you’re paying budget-airline prices for first-class market exposure. You must have clicked the right ETFs on purpose or gotten very lucky. The good news is that low fees compound in your favor over time; the bad news is you can’t blame costs if performance disappoints. Since fees are already lean, the real work now is on allocation choices, not penny-pinching. If you tweak anything, do it for better risk/return balance, not to squeeze out another basis point of fee savings just for sport.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey