This portfolio has only about 9 months of historical data, based on the youngest asset in the portfolio. Some metrics, projections, and AI insights may be less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.
Get this analysis for your own portfolio Paste your holdings — the first report is free and takes about a minute. Analyze mine

Growth focused US heavy portfolio with strong tech tilt and short but very strong recent performance

Report created on May 12, 2026

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification
Curious how your own portfolio scores? Same analysis, your holdings. First report free — no card needed. Analyze mine

Positions

This portfolio is almost entirely in individual US stocks and a handful of sector and theme ETFs, with no bonds or cash-like assets included in the mix. The largest single positions are big US growth names, and the top three holdings alone make up about 30% of the portfolio. This kind of structure puts most of the focus on equity growth rather than stability or income. Because the history available is only around nine months, it mainly shows how this concentrated, growth-leaning mix behaved in a specific market phase, not across a full cycle. The overall setup points toward a portfolio that can move quickly in both directions when markets shift.

Growth Info

Over the roughly nine‑month period, a hypothetical $1,000 grew to about $1,347, which translates to a very high annualized growth rate (CAGR) of 46.67%. That’s far ahead of both the US market and global market benchmarks over the same window. The worst peak‑to‑trough drop was about ‑12.8%, noticeably deeper than the benchmarks but recovered fairly quickly. Also, just 11 trading days made up 90% of total returns, which is typical for more volatile, growthy portfolios. With such a short history, these numbers are more a snapshot of a favorable run than solid evidence of long‑term behavior.

Projection Info

The forward projection uses a Monte Carlo simulation, which basically re‑mixes past daily returns thousands of times to create many possible 15‑year paths for a $1,000 investment. The median outcome lands around $2,688, with a wide band from about $970 to $7,175 between the 5th and 95th percentiles. The average simulated annual return is 7.81%, and about 73% of simulations end positive. Because all these projections lean heavily on only nine months of history, they’re more of an educational illustration of possible ranges than a reliable forecast of what this particular portfolio will actually do.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    95%
  • Other
    5%

Asset‑class‑wise, about 95% of the portfolio is in equities, with the remaining 5% tagged as “other,” largely linked to commodity‑type ETFs. There’s effectively no allocation to traditional stabilizers like bonds. Compared with broad global or US benchmarks, which usually include some fixed income at a multi‑asset level, this is a distinctly equity‑only structure. That’s consistent with the “Growth Investors” risk classification and a 5/7 risk score. The trade‑off is straightforward: strong participation in equity upside, but also more exposure to equity drawdowns, with very little built‑in ballast if stocks as a whole have a rough stretch.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    35%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    17%
  • Telecommunications
    12%
  • Financials
    10%
  • Energy
    6%
  • Health Care
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    3%
  • Industrials
    3%
  • Consumer Staples
    2%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Sector exposure is clearly tilted toward technology at 35%, with consumer discretionary at 17% and telecommunications at 12%, while defensives like consumer staples and utilities are only a small slice. Relative to a broad market index, that’s a meaningful overweight in growth‑oriented, cyclical areas and a lighter presence in more defensive sectors. Tech‑heavy portfolios often benefit when innovation and growth stories lead the market, but they can be more sensitive when interest rates rise or when investors rotate into value or defensive names. The presence of sector ETFs reinforces these tilts rather than smoothing them out.

Regions Info

  • North America
    91%
  • Asia Emerging
    1%
  • Europe Developed
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Geographically, this portfolio is overwhelmingly US‑centric: 91% in North America, with only tiny slivers in emerging Asia and developed Europe. Compared with global equity benchmarks, which usually have a much larger non‑US share, this is a strong home‑country bias. That concentration keeps the portfolio closely tied to US economic conditions, corporate earnings, and the US dollar. When the US market leads, this alignment can be helpful. When other regions outperform or the dollar weakens, the portfolio might not capture as much of that global diversification benefit, simply because other regions barely appear in the mix.

Market capitalization Info

  • Large-cap
    43%
  • Mega-cap
    42%
  • Mid-cap
    6%
  • No data
    5%
  • Small-cap
    2%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

By market cap, the portfolio leans heavily into mega‑cap and large‑cap stocks, together making up about 85%. Mid‑caps and small‑caps are present but only in modest amounts. Large and mega‑caps tend to be more established companies with deeper liquidity and broader analyst coverage, which can sometimes translate to relatively more stable behavior than very small, speculative names. On the other hand, the smaller exposures and thematic ETFs can still introduce bursts of volatility. Overall, this profile looks more like a growth‑tilted large‑cap portfolio with a few satellite positions, rather than a broad, equal spread across all size segments.

True holdings Info

  • Amazon.com Inc
    12.88%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    Direct holding 12.69%
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    10.78%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    Direct holding 10.65%
  • Synopsys Inc
    7.08%
  • NVIDIA Corporation
    6.92%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    • Technology Select Sector SPDR® Fund
    Direct holding 5.28%
  • Capital One Financial Corporation
    4.47%
  • Amkor Technology Inc
    4.34%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc
    3.59%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    Direct holding 3.53%
  • Lululemon Athletica Inc.
    3.00%
  • Oklo Inc.
    2.64%
  • Arista Networks
    2.31%
  • Top 10 total 58.02%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Looking through the ETFs, the biggest underlying exposures largely mirror the direct holdings, with Amazon, Alphabet, and NVIDIA showing up both directly and via funds. Amazon’s combined exposure is about 12.9%, Alphabet’s about 10.8%, and NVIDIA’s nearly 7%, with a small portion of each coming from ETFs. This overlap means the portfolio is more concentrated in these names than the surface‑level weightings alone suggest. Because the look‑through only uses ETF top‑10 holdings, some duplication may still be hidden. Even with partial data, it’s clear that a handful of big tech names play an outsized role in driving overall outcomes.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 73%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
Very low
Data availability: 95%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
High
Data availability: 63%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
High
Data availability: 63%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 64%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 99%

Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.

From a factor perspective, the standouts are very low exposure to the size factor and high exposure to momentum and quality. Factor exposure is like checking what “traits” the portfolio favors. Very low size exposure means a clear tilt away from smaller companies and toward larger ones. High momentum suggests the holdings have recently been strong performers, which can help in trending markets but can bite during sharp reversals. High quality typically reflects stronger balance sheets and profitability, which can sometimes cushion downside relative to lower‑quality peers. With only nine months of data behind these estimates, these tilts should be read as early signals, not permanent traits.

Risk contribution Info

  • Amazon.com Inc
    Weight: 12.69%
    14.0%
  • Synopsys Inc
    Weight: 7.08%
    13.4%
  • Amkor Technology Inc
    Weight: 4.34%
    10.7%
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    Weight: 10.65%
    9.7%
  • Technology Select Sector SPDR® Fund
    Weight: 8.34%
    8.2%
  • Top 5 risk contribution 56.0%

Risk contribution looks at how much each position adds to the portfolio’s overall ups and downs, not just its weight. Here, Amazon, Synopsys, and Amkor collectively contribute about 38% of total risk, even though they’re only roughly a quarter of the portfolio by weight. Amkor is especially notable, with a risk‑to‑weight ratio of 2.46, meaning it adds much more volatility than its size alone suggests. This pattern is common when concentrated single‑stock positions and volatile names sit alongside diversified ETFs. It shows that a few holdings can dominate the ride, even when they don’t dominate the dollar allocation.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

The efficient frontier analysis compares how this portfolio’s mix of holdings stacks up against the best possible combinations of the same ingredients. The current portfolio has a Sharpe ratio of 1.73, while the optimal mix of these holdings reaches 4.72, with higher return and lower risk. It also sits about 50 percentage points below the frontier at its current risk level, meaning its risk/return balance is not as efficient as it could be using only these assets. With such a short return history and exceptionally high recent returns, these Sharpe values are likely inflated and should be treated as illustrative rather than definitive.

Dividends Info

  • Amkor Technology Inc 0.40%
  • Capital One Financial Corporation 1.50%
  • Global X Copper Miners ETF 2.20%
  • EQT Corporation 0.90%
  • Alphabet Inc Class C 0.20%
  • Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF 0.30%
  • Marvell Technology Group Ltd 0.10%
  • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF 1.00%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.30%
  • Energy Select Sector SPDR® Fund 2.60%
  • Technology Select Sector SPDR® Fund 0.40%
  • Health Care Select Sector SPDR® Fund 1.80%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.65%

The overall dividend yield is relatively low at about 0.65%, even though there is a dedicated US dividend ETF and some income‑oriented sector funds. Many of the largest positions—big tech and growth names—either don’t pay dividends or pay only tiny ones, so most of the portfolio’s return potential is tied to price changes rather than regular cash payouts. Dividend yield is just one part of total return, but a lower yield means less built‑in income and more reliance on market appreciation. This pattern fits with the growth orientation seen elsewhere, though it does mean income plays a smaller role in the portfolio’s profile.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Teucrium Sugar 0.58%
  • Global X Copper Miners ETF 0.65%
  • Teucrium Corn Fund 1.76%
  • Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF 0.75%
  • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF 0.03%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Teucrium Wheat 1.00%
  • Energy Select Sector SPDR® Fund 0.09%
  • Technology Select Sector SPDR® Fund 0.09%
  • Health Care Select Sector SPDR® Fund 0.09%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.11%

On costs, the portfolio is actually quite lean overall. The total TER stands at about 0.11%, pulled down by low‑cost core funds like the Schwab broad‑market and dividend ETFs. Some of the more specialized commodity and thematic funds charge much higher fees—over 1% in a few cases—but they sit at relatively small weights, so they don’t move the total cost much. Low ongoing costs are helpful because they leave more of any future returns in the portfolio rather than going to fees. That said, with only nine months of performance, it’s too early to judge whether those higher‑cost niche exposures have been worth their price.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey